Jump to content

Can You Daily Drive a Chevy 3100?

Ferrari Eater
 Share

Recommended Posts

Daly Senior Enthusiast

Daly

Posted
Posted

When it was brand new someone daily drove it. Provided it's in good shape, you should be able to, too.

JimCost2014 Senior Enthusiast

JimCost2014

Posted
Posted

With todays traffic, upgraded brakes, steering, and cooling system for starters. 

Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted
57 minutes ago, Ferrari Eater said:

Completely stock, can you daily drive a 3100? If not, what modifications are necessary to make it drivable?

Absolutely. I ride an Royal Enfield that is 70 years old without issue. I just don't ride it like it's today technology. Mindful of longer braking distances and such. I certainly don't ask it to do 70 mph so I stay off the interstate. Big deal. You're in control, not the technology. If you wanted disc brakes and power steering why would you buy it to begin with unless 'resto-rod' is your thing. But ability wise. Sure and if you don't want to, let me know. I'll take it off your hands. 

  • Like 1
Ferrari Eater Enthusiast

Ferrari Eater

Posted
  • Author
Posted
21 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Sure and if you don't want to, let me know. I'll take it off your hands. 

Thanks, but I don't actually have one. Just wondering.

  • Thanks 1
Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted
52 minutes ago, Ferrari Eater said:

Thanks, but I don't actually have one. Just wondering.

I had, up to a few years ago, a collection of motorcycles. Three of which were antiques. I've ridden everything from a Honda step through Campus 50 to a Hurricane. Sport. Touring. Roadsters. Trials. Purpose built Drag bikes. Bonneville lake bike. Last two both gas and fuel. One to six cylinder. Nothing makes me smile more than a 40's to 60's Britt half liter single roadster on a wooded back lane doing 50 mph. That Enfield had a 5 gallon tank and got 92 mpg at 60 mph. All day between fuel stops. That was good because a fuel stop was at minimum an hour long. Everyone wanted to talk about the bike. EVERYONE. :crackup:

 

We've been looking for some years for the 'right' 28/29 Model A Tudor to tour in across the USA. There are actually clubs for this sort of adventure. A 53 3100 216 babbitt beater would feel like a light year jump in tech over the A.   

  • Like 1
  • 1 year later...
alodawg26 Enthusiast

alodawg26

Posted
Posted

Why not? Depending on how fast you want to go, definitely doable. I think Chevy 3100 was the naming prior to the c/k line, so maybe not the right forum? Either way, these trucks were not built for speed. My 63 tops out at about 55mph, but I also have the original 230, 3-speed column, and original rear end. If you want speed, you would need more gears. Also, they have tons of suspension upgrades for these old trucks. 

  • 1 year later...
  • 3 months later...
newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted
On 1/2/2024 at 11:42 AM, carefulcarl said:

I was concerned about todays gas.  

 

On 1/2/2024 at 12:03 PM, carefulcarl said:

I am concerned about putting in a 1953 chevy 3100

 

 

 

Find non-ethanol if you can which is typically 90 or higher octane, and if the engine hasn't had valve seats done, run a lead substitute.  Here's one that's a good product, Amsoil Dominator octane boost -  What is a Lead Substitute (and Do I Need One)? - AMSOIL Blog

Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted

From AMSOIL:

Lead also protected against valve recession

Lead also emerged as an effective way to protect against valve-seat recession, which can occur under high-rpm, high-heat, high-load conditions.

 

********************************

 

So, avoid high rpm, high load conditions. I was driving then. Hard seats were a good idea for a pickup towing heavy, a school bus or a gasser dump truck but grandmothers and work a day people would never see the benefit. 

 

Change the sensitive parts to something not sensitive. Modern rubber fuel lines replace older materials. If you fuel tank is aluminum or steel, no issues. I doubt it has a fiberglass tank. Soldered floats will fail with time. Carry a spare or use a modern injection system like a Holley Sniper. Upgrade diaphragm fuel pumps. You get the idea.  

KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted

I always until recently had very old vehicles I drove on weekends. Wait a minute I still do. My avalanche is over 20 years old and my wife’s toy is too. My last 5 years working I drove my 65 Chevy step side. It was actually a retro ride. And my 64 elcamino weather permitting. Rainy days I drove my 98 two door Tahoe. Later my 92 Chevy. I prefer driving older vehicles. Older vehicles you have to be mindful of brake limitations. There’re fixes for that. My 65 step side was completely modernized. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Jsdirt
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Jsdirt · Posted

      Spot on. The government makes ridiculous mandates, and this causes manufacturers to jump through hoops for every TENTH of a MPG. Main reason quality is in the toilet and prices are in the stratosphere.   The gov't tightened the MPG requirements so much 5 years ago that the only way manufacturers could meet these absolutely ridiculous numbers was to go all EV. Hence the push.     Nobody hates good MPG, Atlas - nobody is "whining". Your side has that trait all locked up. What a stupid argument attempt!   What I particularly hate is the government meddling in the free market system. Had this system been allowed to work as designed and intended by our Founders, cars and trucks would be hitting numbers that would blow our minds, all while costing 30% LESS. Not only that, but engines could probably hit 150k miles again without needing major internal surgery.   My forty year old Ford 302 has 312k on it. Wonder what changed?🤔
    • revmanii
      Starting a new thread regarding mounting my 2014 OEM wheels to my 2026

      By revmanii · Posted

      The BORA 3/8" spacers arrived yesterday along with the extended lug nuts. I got the front wheels changed out today, but was overheated and covered in sweat so bad, I figured getting both front wheels done was a win, and took a cool shower. Hopefully, I'll go out tomorrow morning before it gets into the 80+ temps and do the backs. After getting the first wheel snugged up, I backed out one of the lug nuts then hand turned to count threads. I believe I stopped counting around 12-13, so I think I'm good there.    
    • Atlas
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Atlas · Posted

      My fullsize truck is averaging over 26mpg so I'm pretty happy with the increased fuel economy targets. When I had my gas Silverado (2020 5.3) it was averaging 21. Again, for a fullsize truck, that's very different from the 12-15 these things used to get 30 years ago.   Whine all you want, increased MPG is a good thing.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a fair point, and I think an OBD-first proof is probably the right next step. I agree that the value is not the hardware box by itself. The marketable part would be the software: always-on capture, baseline learning, event reduction, system-specific reports, and alerts. Also agreed that if an OBD device is always plugged in and has local storage, it should not miss the event in the same way that a scanner plugged in after the fact would. The only thing I would not want to assume yet is that an ELM327-class device gives all the late-GM data needed at the rate needed. Standard OBD live data, DTCs, freeze frame, Mode 6, VIN, and calibration information are definitely the right starting point. GDS2 also proves that a lot of useful ECM data can be viewed through the DLC without needing a DTC first. The question I need to test is whether the data needed for a useful GM V8 event report is actually available through the DLC, and at a useful sample rate: - misfire counts / roughness by cylinder - AFM/DFM state - oil pressure and oil temperature - fuel trims - voltage / reset context - U-codes and communication events - calibration / software information - whether these are standard PIDs, enhanced DIDs, Mode 6 data, GDS2-only data, or not available So I think the right benchmark is: 1. Build the OBD-only version first. 2. Keep it plugged in and logging locally. 3. Compare it against GDS2 / freeze frame / HP Tuners or another higher-end logger. 4. Measure which parameters are available and at what update rate. 5. Only justify ECM-side hardware if it captures useful evidence the OBD version cannot. So you may be right: the consumer product might simply be an always-plugged-in OBD event recorder with much better reporting. A question for you: when you say ELM327 devices can already deliver all the data needed, do you mean generic OBD Mode 01 data only, or GM enhanced data as well? For a useful GM V8 report, would generic OBD data be enough, or would you expect the tool to include enhanced items like misfire by cylinder, AFM/DFM state, oil pressure/oil temp, U-codes, and calibration information?
    • Buckwild27
      Gas Prices

      By Buckwild27 · Posted

      I agree. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...