Jump to content

FUEL GAUGE INACCURATE


rickg gmparts

Recommended Posts

Posted

just looking to see if i'm the only one with a terrible reading fuel gauge. I've had it at half and can only put 10-11 gallons in it and I've had it at 3/4(or slightly above) and put 21 gallons in it. 1700 miles on truck. before I complain about it, figured I'd ask here. I checked in my service manual for bulletins and din't see anything- can be confusing to hunt down something like this being a parts guy

Posted

Fuel gauges suck on most new vehicles.  My truck goes well beyond full, and when it's on E there's still like 8 gallons left of something.  Guess they're trying to keep idiots from running out of gas.

Posted
7 minutes ago, 2020-2500 said:

Fuel gauges suck on most new vehicles.  My truck goes well beyond full, and when it's on E there's still like 8 gallons left of something.  Guess they're trying to keep idiots from running out of gas.

my 14 and 17 1500 trucks were actually pretty good. I always have understood fuel gauges are  flaky, but have figured them out for each of my trucks. neighbor down my road has gmc and he keeps looking at fuel mileage left vs looking at fuel gauge because it's so bad

 

Posted
Just now, rickg gmparts said:

my 14 and 17 1500 trucks were actually pretty good. I always have understood fuel gauges are  flaky, but have figured them out for each of my trucks. neighbor down my road has gmc and he keeps looking at fuel mileage left vs looking at fuel gauge because it's so bad

 

I also understand how full means 3-5 gallons coming off full mark and having a reserve of 5-7 gallons for emergencies- but when my needle just comes off full and I put 11 gallons in it, something is not right

Posted

My gas gauge has been pretty accurate. I have over 8000 miles on the truck and have been tracking my MPG with aCar phone app. I'd at least call and let your dealer know you are having issues with it just to make a record of the issue.

Posted

Mine will give me like 200 miles and only burn 1/4 tank.  Then it drops like a rock from there. It’s like a turbo- starts off slow and then wham!

 

Kind of annoying but is is nice to drive for a few days without the needle moving. Ha!

Posted

For those that aren't happy with the fuel gauge, Is the 'range remaining' number fail accurate?

 

Might help diagnose if it is the sender in the tank or the display on the dash that is the issue.

Posted
On 6/4/2020 at 1:51 PM, rickg gmparts said:

but when my needle just comes off full and I put 11 gallons in it, something is not right

Yes, something is not right. So have them look at it. Sender, calibrations. 

 

Supplemental Information:

 

 ΔV = V0βΔT

 

1.) Gas volume changes with temperature. Yes the gas in the stations tank is fairly constant but the temperature in your tank is not. The OP's question isn't one of value but of volume. A tank filled in the morning holds more than one filled during the heat of the day. Each 18 F (15 C)  = about a pint of fuel per 13.2 gallons of delivery. 

 

2.) Station pumps are volume delivery and must be accurate within 3 cubic inches of volume on 10 gallons delivered. How much is that? 0.012987 gallons per 10 gallons delivered. 

 

3.) Ground temperature is fairly constant but the piping and pump above ground are not. Those first few gallons are less dense yes but more importantly the Vapor Pressure is higher. You've experienced this on a hot day when the pumps automatic shut off kicks you out a half dozen times before it settles in to a continuous pump. 

 

4.) Different nozzles have different attachments/shields/springs/stops the cover or alter the insertion depth of various nozzles. In a fuel neck the diameter of a beer can this is more error than the pumps delivery. In fact if the cover contains the vapor release it can be a half gallon different than pulling it back a half inch. 

 

5.) How she sits at the pump. Slope of the vehicle alters fill amounts. Sometimes by a bunch depending on the tanks geometry and actual neck vent location or indention for mounting straps creating vapor pockets. Everything matters. 

 

6.) Error stack. The above five can come in any combination. 

 

However off by 11 gallons is none of the above. For your miles remaining to be a reliable indicator your MPG calculator on board would have to be accurate. Very accurate. It's also worth noting that these miles remaining numbers change with usage. That is you can actually gain miles to empty if you encounter a good distances of exceptional conditions favoring good efficiency. 

 

Note his comment that the venturi effect can be signaled with either liquid or vapor pressure. 

 

 

 

Posted

fuel guage and mpg on DIC are friggen joke.....my 1500 RST was better on both ends

 

I filled mine up to 29 gal from empty and it reads full with 7 gal left to go for actual full level

and DIC mpg is all over the map on same stretch of highway at normal driving......17mpg some days and 10mpg on other days, 

 

no fuel guage has ever been accuarate or consistent to be fair but DIC mpg is complete joke......I drive the same and mpg is all over the map depending on how it feels that day...….for 36 gal tank I get about same mpg as I did on my 22 gal tank with RST overall.....I haven't done the math accurately but it has to be around 10-12 mpg total....pretty sad considering the 6.2 puts out more power and does quite a bit better.....I usually don't really watch this kinda thing but DIC started to piss me off so I got on bandwagon I hate being on. lol

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted

my fuel, battery, coolant, and oil pressure analog gauges all do not match the digital gauges on my phone using Torque app with obdii dongle.

 

I've had 90% of fuel on digital, but analog still on Full. I've gotten used to this over the years with multiple vehicles, and with the advent of fuel range readout I just use that instead. 

 

coolant is probably worst offender and this isn't the only gm vehicle I've seen it on, I think it's typical of all of them going back decades. warming up I'll see 130 digital but analog is already past 160. running temp is 195 but analog is 210.

 

I don't see the point of putting numbers or tick marks on analog gauges if both are inaccurate.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,858
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    mark2
    Newest Member
    mark2
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 648 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • It is working as designed.  NHT and non NHT trucks have the same exact transmission cooling setup.  NHT just gets a larger radiator.     The transmission cooler loop on these is as follows.     -Transmission out goes into an oil to water heat exchanger (item #1 in the first illustration below).  This exchanger has engine coolant opposite the transmission fluid and uses engine coolant to warm and then regulate the transmission fluid temperature when its in the operating window.   - From the cooler it goes to a thermal bypass valve (item #11 in the 2nd illustration below).  If the ATF has not reached the temp to open the bypass (194F), it loops back.   - When it reaches 194F, the thermostat opens and ATF then flows out to the oil to air auxiliary cooler (item #17 in the 2nd illustration) at the front of the truck.  From there it goes back to the transmission.     Your only fix would be to swap for the PPE thermal bypass delete block which will open the loop to the aux cooler all the time.  It will STILL run warm, probably 170-200F, but that's as low as you'll get it as its still flowing through the oil to water exchanger.      
    • Most say the oil temperature needs to above the boiling point of water to rid it of moisture and long enough to dry it. Many think that is about a hour at 212 F or more. Those people have never line dried cloths in a Midwest winter. Leave a pan of water sitting on the counter and eventually it all evaporates. So heat drives the time it takes. Water in oil under 175 F, the Nitration initiation temperature, is a minimum then for temperature and samples I've done that use Karl Fisher method say about a hour (in a healthy well tuned motor) over 175 F will dry it to under 800 ppm. Low enough to not be much of a factor. Motors with weak rings will take longer and the colder the air temperature the longer it takes.   On a cold motor there is also the condensation temperature. Blowby gases that contain moisture are subject to that cold cylinder wall, like sweat on a glass of ice tea. But also subject to the Law of Partial Pressures. Wear studies by GM and the DOD  indicate wear is a real issue below 85 F and a concern to 140 F but doesn't become a minimal factor until about 160 F. You know this intuitively when you see water vapor exit the exhaust pipe until the system gets above the dew point. It isn't magic, it's physics and it fascinates me. I know you didn't ask but....I over share sometimes. 😉    You keep the Camaro's high and tight.  
    • Move further away.   Benefit of living out - none of our cars get short cycled, plenty of warm up time.   Curious how much time/temperature it takes to drive moisture/condensation out of the engine?
    • Switch a a 100% synthetic trans fluid, Amsoil works for me.
    • First of all sorry, I know there are a ton of transmission temperature threads...   My truck is a 2025 LZ0 High (10l89 10-speed) High Country with NHT max trailering package. The NHT package is supposed to have "enhanced cooling."   Normally the trans temp sits around 200. It seems like with any real stress it quickly jumps into the 220s (for example climbing a grade unloaded at lower speeds). I haven't towed much with this truck, but I'm concerned if it gets this hot unloaded.    I've tried a few different things to keep the temps down (tow/haul mode, sport mode, low range when that makes sense) and nothing seems to affect it.    I'm curious if others are the same behavior or if anyone has found techniques to keep the temps down. It seems like it just can't handle reduced airflow at lower speeds, even with relatively light loading.    Thanks!      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...