Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 7/11/2020 at 9:37 AM, Bipolar said:

Hi everyone and thanks for having me! My last two trucks were Ford F150s. It has been a few years since I owned a GM product.

I am looking at purchasing a 2018 Sierra 1500 with 22000 miles on it. It has the 5.3 engine and a six speed transmission.

It looks to be in pretty good condition with a few options. It was a rental vehicle for the first part of its life.

I am curious if there is anything I should look out for or questions I should ask the seller.

 

Thanks in advance!!

Curious, any particular reason you're not going with a 3rd F150? Not looking to start a bash fest on Ford, just curious what your experience was like (good and bad). And I'm with everyone else on staying away from a rental purchase, I did it once with a 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee and it was by far the most problematic vehicle I've ever owned. Had it barely a year and put over $4k into repairs in it. The price on the Grand Cherokee lured me away from GM, but in the end I lost my a** when I traded it in to get back into a GM product. Haven't looked at a vehicle with rental history ever since.

Posted

Five of my last six vehicles were Ford F150s and one was an older 1982 GMC 1500.

They all were very reliable vehicles. The vehicle I am driving now is a 2011 F150 ex U-Haul vehicle.

I have owned it for over seven years and it has not needed anything other that oil changes gas and a set of tires

and I replaced the front rotors and pads last week.

 

Up here in Canada's west coast every truck I have looked at is either overpriced or very high mileage or both.

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Bipolar said:

Five of my last six vehicles were Ford F150s and one was an older 1982 GMC 1500.

They all were very reliable vehicles. The vehicle I am driving now is a 2011 F150 ex U-Haul vehicle.

I have owned it for over seven years and it has not needed anything other that oil changes gas and a set of tires

and I replaced the front rotors and pads last week.

 

Up here in Canada's west coast every truck I have looked at is either overpriced or very high mileage or both.

 

 

Gotcha, maybe Canadians are much nicer with their rentals lol. Glad you've had good luck with your current rental purchase.

  • Like 1
Posted

I gave the dealer a $500.00 deposit on the truck today  and I will fly there and drive it home next week.

No turning back now! I will keep you posted as to how it works out!

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I made it home yesterday afternoon with the new truck. The trip home was 15 1/2 hours driving 1407 kilometres or 875 miles. Other than a flat tire the trip was uneventful. The truck burnt 9.0 litres of fuel every 100 kilometres or 26.1 miles per gallon. I stopped to fill the fuel tank half way but I'm pretty sure it would have made the trip on one tank. I'm very happy with my purchase its the first GM product I have owned in a lot of years. Its very quiet at highway speeds and everything in the cab is nicely laid out.

  • Like 2
Posted

98 litre tank at 9 l/100 km = 1100 km/tank

 

Also note that (at least on mine) the fuel consumption is about a half litre more than what the computer says.  Still, you did pretty good considering the mountains.

Posted
23 hours ago, Bipolar said:

I made it home yesterday afternoon with the new truck. The trip home was 15 1/2 hours driving 1407 kilometres or 875 miles. Other than a flat tire the trip was uneventful. The truck burnt 9.0 litres of fuel every 100 kilometres or 26.1 miles per gallon. I stopped to fill the fuel tank half way but I'm pretty sure it would have made the trip on one tank. I'm very happy with my purchase its the first GM product I have owned in a lot of years. Its very quiet at highway speeds and everything in the cab is nicely laid out.

You've got me curious.  Your trip sounds like some of my previous day trips!  Where in BC are you?  Good luck with your truck.  I'd be more comfortable buying a used truck from a reputable rental company than a comparable used truck from a stranger.  Either way its a risk but you do what you can to reduce your chances by doing your research.  I rent regularly and probably take better care of the rental than my own vehicle.  I don't want any extra charges or hassles when I return the vehicle!

Posted (edited)

DO NOT buy it. I used to work for enterprise and the ****** we did.  I remember in the minus 35C days we would rev the ****** out of them keep them at 4k to warm up the engine while it was frozen stiff stories go on. 

Edited by Pinnacle
Posted
10 hours ago, Pinnacle said:

DO NOT buy it. I used to work for enterprise and the ****** we did.  I remember in the minus 35C days we would rev the ****** out of them keep them at 4k to warm up the engine while it was frozen stiff stories go on. 

That's funny right there.

Reminds me of the time about 30 years ago I had a loaner dodge minivan from the dealer.

Me and my brother took it to dinner it was about -20 F.

Left it in first gear and let it sing for about a mile. We were laughing our asses off. It had about 35 miles on it. I did a lot of dumb schitt like this back then .  ??

Posted
11 hours ago, Pinnacle said:

DO NOT buy it. I used to work for enterprise and the ****** we did.  I remember in the minus 35C days we would rev the ****** out of them keep them at 4k to warm up the engine while it was frozen stiff stories go on. 

He already bought it, and drove it almost 900 miles back home.

Posted (edited)

I am pleased with my new truck. It has a few months of bumper to bumper warranty left so if and issues come up they are covered.

Its a nice vehicle to drive and other than a few scratches in the box liner it looks like new.

spacer.pngO5r2AHw.jpg[/IMG]

Edited by Bipolar
Posted
On 7/11/2020 at 6:19 PM, lryfer said:

Heh buy my 2018 LTZ 6756 miles on it. She loaded up.  I thinking of getting a 2020 GMC Sierra.

I'll give you $23k CAD for it. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,984 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...