Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

New to this forum but have always been on some kind of vehicle specific forum throughout the years. Just got this truck a few weeks ago and loving it. Traded in my cough cough, Honda for this 17 Sierra SLT z71. Loving it and glad to be back in a GM vehicle. Will definitely go well with my 2002 WS6.

 

 

84212A28-CA76-4FFC-800E-E40BB27B15E1.jpeg

952959AD-2CF1-4469-9656-1C2406BC836B.jpeg

  • Like 3
Posted

Good looking Sierra. Welcome to the forum, glad to have you [emoji106]

Sent from my Z999 using Tapatalk

Posted

Welcome. Hope this group can be of some assistance if you need it. Tell us about you new truck.... Miles, options, likes, dislikes, some to be modifications, certified or not. What ever you want to share. 

Posted

Nice choice... I purchased a 2017 GMC Sierra SLT 6.2L (Texas Edition).

IMG_0010.JPG

Posted
4 hours ago, rav3 said:

Welcome. Hope this group can be of some assistance if you need it. Tell us about you new truck.... Miles, options, likes, dislikes, some to be modifications, certified or not. What ever you want to share. 

Got it used and rescued from a local Ford dealership. Had 49k on it and now just past 50k. Carfax shows it was religiously serviced at the local Buick GMC dealer in town so happy it’s a local truck. I’m getting a RC 2” level put on tomorrow and looking to get some 60 series tires in the future. Minus 6.2, heavy tow package, navigation and moonroof, it’s basically optioned like a Denali. Was tired of the Iowa winters and decided I’d pull the trigger on this truck and not have to worry as much when the really bad winter blows in. Unsure how far mods will go but that’s usually how it starts haha.......

Posted (edited)

Nice truck.  I want see a pic of the WS6.  We used to have 2001 TA NHRA edition and I still have my 2000 Camaro SS that I ordered new.

Edited by Mike GMC
Posted
3 hours ago, Mike GMC said:

Nice truck.  I want see a pic of the WS6.  We used to have 2001 TA NHRA edition and I still have my 2000 Camaro SS that I ordered new.

Agreed. Let’s see the ws6

Posted
10 hours ago, paumat said:

Agreed. Let’s see the ws6

Yes let's see it.

My uncle bought a 02 Camaro SS brand new. He's 76 and still beats the piss out of it daily.

Posted (edited)

Here’s my 01 base TA that’s on the vfn fiberglass website showing the 4 inch Ws6 cowl hood. Had Bogart bolted D10 wheels, heads, cam, 4.56 12 bolt, all bolt ons, suspension, weight reduction etc. Unfortunately the motor blew up and sent connecting rod out side of block and down through oil pan. 

C808CB33-8D7E-440C-89B8-58F0A0B2EE1D.jpeg

Edited by pistol_pete_m9

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,821 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...