Jump to content

BBP Tune and Octane Choice

xSHIFTxNASTYx

Recommended Posts

xSHIFTxNASTYx Enthusiast

xSHIFTxNASTYx

Posted
Posted

For those of you running BBP tunes on your truck, what tune and octane choice have some of you settled on? I'm still testing out both of them but am just curious what everyone else has decided on that have ran BBP's tunes way longer than I have. Currently running on their 91/93 tune with 93 octane fuel. Not sure I feel a huge difference in performance (not that there is much of a difference anyway, maybe 15 HP and torque extra, emphasis on maybe), but I like that most brands have better additives in their premium fuel than 87/89. My concern is deciding if the 91/93 tune and 93 octane fuel is worth the extra cost of fuel over the course of a year. Figuring that I'm paying an extra $0.70/gallon each fuel up, that's almost an extra $1,200 in fuel per year to go from 87 to 93 (roughly, if my math is correct).

 

Also, I'm finding random spikes of 2°-4° knock ****** on 93 octane, but they're random, like once every 5-10 minutes. It goes back down to 0° and holds steady. I'm going to assume this is false KR. I tried to do some light research but some stuff I've read has felt anecdotal. Rather common in my readings are the false KR spikes due to road noise, loud exhausts, and just basic things like a door shutting although I'm not opening and shutting my door on the freeway either. ? Could use some insight from more knowledgeable members on what to look for in monitoring KR with different fuel brands and ratings. I'll have to go back to the 87/89 tune with 89 octane and monitor the KR, didn't think of doing that during my first few fill ups.

tenscourts Enthusiast

tenscourts

Posted
Posted

I was told by BBP as well as the shop that did my lift never to run 87 in these trucks as the engine compression was too high. BBP also told me to expect the best fuel mileage from 89. I was running 89 but not that I'm working from home and not driving as much I'm going back to premium.

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk. My build thread: http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/index.php?/topic/192614-Tenscourts'-2016-LTZ/Z71-CCSB-4WD-Silverado

m3n00b Enthusiast

m3n00b

Posted
Posted

I only run 91 in my '16 6.2.  It's only 20-30 cents more per gallon here so why even chance it?  If we had 93 I would even pay more to run that.  

Pearl2017 Enthusiast

Pearl2017

Posted
Posted

I don't have a BBP tune but was scanning 17 6.2 with HPT and could see i was getting some kr just driving highway as road goes up slight elevations. The highest oct i can find here is 91 so i modded the timing map slightly where it was occurring and the truck seems to run better with 0 kr now. I don't have any hard proof but i don't think constant background knock is good for gdi injectors. Saving a few cents on gas may not be worth it.

gat0r Enthusiast

gat0r

Posted
Posted

be careful of using cheap gas stations.

 

i use higher octane b/c i am boosted, so i stick w/ 93

 

 

 

the last time i had a loaner, i filled it the 1st time w/ 87...  it didnt like that.

next time i filled w/ 89 & no issues.

xSHIFTxNASTYx Enthusiast

xSHIFTxNASTYx

Posted
  • Author
Posted
5 hours ago, gat0r said:

be careful of using cheap gas stations.

 

i use higher octane b/c i am boosted, so i stick w/ 93

 

 

 

the last time i had a loaner, i filled it the 1st time w/ 87...  it didnt like that.

next time i filled w/ 89 & no issues.

Yeah, I try to stick with top tier when I can and only in high traffic areas. None of those mom and pop back country gas stations. Always makes me chuckle when an Admiral is packed with cars waiting on a pump just because their garbage gas is $0.35 cheaper than a top tier on the opposite corner (yeah yeah, nobody likes waiting on a left hand turn in the middle lane, but still).

xSHIFTxNASTYx Enthusiast

xSHIFTxNASTYx

Posted
  • Author
Posted
6 hours ago, Pearl2017 said:

I don't have a BBP tune but was scanning 17 6.2 with HPT and could see i was getting some kr just driving highway as road goes up slight elevations. The highest oct i can find here is 91 so i modded the timing map slightly where it was occurring and the truck seems to run better with 0 kr now. I don't have any hard proof but i don't think constant background knock is good for gdi injectors. Saving a few cents on gas may not be worth it.

What do you consider "constant background knock"? My situation where I'm finding a few degrees of KR every once in awhile, or when it's constantly advancing KR for long periods of time? I've read explanations that show differences in engines running 1-2° of KR every once in a while being false KR, vs an engine having 10-11° KR constantly, vs some extreme situations where wrong timings with bad gas have 30-35° of KR. I don't know enough about KR and you know how the internet is, can't always believe everything you read especially when one study says one thing and another says another. Like this one study swearing that Shell 93 is garbage gas and their v-power additives being the reason behind bad KR but in MI, at least around me, I have had best luck on gas from Shell than any other top tier brand, with Mobil supposedly being good and not that great around me - so again it feels anecdotal.

 

I'm just trying to understand what to look for and eliminate in KR. Guess this is why we leave it to the pros. ?

Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, Pearl2017 said:

I don't have a BBP tune but was scanning 17 6.2 with HPT and could see i was getting some kr just driving highway as road goes up slight elevations. The highest oct i can find here is 91 so i modded the timing map slightly where it was occurring and the truck seems to run better with 0 kr now. I don't have any hard proof but i don't think constant background knock is good for gdi injectors. Saving a few cents on gas may not be worth it.

Motor can't measure octane but it can detect knock and so it 'test' by pushing timing to the limiting point then backs it off until it stops. Part of the programming.  A motor makes best power and efficiency at what the engineers call 'incipient knock'.

 

The dyno mule of a new motor it is fitted with a pressure sensor, which measures and traces cylinder pressure as it happens instead of knock sensor which 'listens' remotely for what has already happened a micro second ago.  

 

If your monitoring and don't see any KR there's money being left on the table. My 4.3 shows the same amount of KR running 87 as it does running 93. But there is more total timing with the 93. That said I've never be able to discern a measurable amount of fuel efficiency between the two. Well not enough to justify the $1 a gallon difference anyway. 

Pearl2017 Enthusiast

Pearl2017

Posted
Posted

Its been a while since i scanned it but i had filter set so to capture only multiple knock events. At the same time I could see timing being pulled. I applied a correction based on the scan to the timing and timing stabilized. From an engineering perspective I appreciate the ability for the ECU to control advance/KR to ride on the bleeding edge. I figured the 91 Oct was on low side for an engine tuned for 93 Oct thus more knock on the high octane timing map. I pulled up a scan you can see the timing droop down when throttle went up ~1% and some knocking. I was scanning on a trip and afterward i believe i had injector problems and had to take it in for second time. Haven't had any injector problems since clipping out the KR.

2020-08-13 21_32_48-Start.png

Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, Pearl2017 said:

Its been a while since i scanned it but i had filter set so to capture only multiple knock events. At the same time I could see timing being pulled. I applied a correction based on the scan to the timing and timing stabilized. From an engineering perspective I appreciate the ability for the ECU to control advance/KR to ride on the bleeding edge. I figured the 91 Oct was on low side for an engine tuned for 93 Oct thus more knock on the high octane timing map. I pulled up a scan you can see the timing droop down when throttle went up ~1% and some knocking. I was scanning on a trip and afterward i believe i had injector problems and had to take it in for second time. Haven't had any injector problems since clipping out the KR.

2020-08-13 21_32_48-Start.png

How slick is that? :thumbs:

flyingfool Senior Enthusiast

flyingfool

Posted
Posted

I wonder if your picking up noise from the tranny?  sloppy torque converter, pump making noise? or direct injector or AFM  tripping the knock sensor?  anychance you can reflash to stock ecu mapping and do a BBtune comparo

 

i would add some trans PIDS to your datalog, see if its picking up knock in conjunction with tcc lock up points..

 

also doesnt histogram feature in HP tuner do a map layout of the 3d timing curve to cross ref with your knock sensor..

 

i enjoy seeing more people on here using hptuners  and posting up tech info..

MaverickZ71 Senior Enthusiast

MaverickZ71

Posted
Posted

My apologies to the OP, but I've had a question floating around in my noggin for years: 

 

We all see those goon mobiles with the thump-bump-BOOM stereo systems, where their stereo system cost more than their vehicle.  Some of them shake everything for a block around, like a mobile earthquake.  You know--the ones where the drivers work exclusively at the drive thrus in fast food restaurants and they make you repeat everything 10 times because they can't hear anything, and you still don't get what you ordered.  

 

If the knock sensors are so sensitive and have such ultimate control over the engine, how do the knock sensors even allow those vehicles (and the ones around them) to run at all???

xSHIFTxNASTYx Enthusiast

xSHIFTxNASTYx

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 hours ago, MaverickZ71 said:

My apologies to the OP, but I've had a question floating around in my noggin for years: 

 

We all see those goon mobiles with the thump-bump-BOOM stereo systems, where their stereo system cost more than their vehicle.  Some of them shake everything for a block around, like a mobile earthquake.  You know--the ones where the drivers work exclusively at the drive thrus in fast food restaurants and they make you repeat everything 10 times because they can't hear anything, and you still don't get what you ordered.  

 

If the knock sensors are so sensitive and have such ultimate control over the engine, how do the knock sensors even allow those vehicles (and the ones around them) to run at all???

That's an interesting thought. I don't have a "thump-bump-BOOM" stereo but I did upgrade my speakers. I'll crank them up and see if I can get KR to trigger. ??

truckguy82 Senior Enthusiast

truckguy82

Posted
Posted
On 8/12/2020 at 6:56 AM, xSHIFTxNASTYx said:

For those of you running BBP tunes on your truck, what tune and octane choice have some of you settled on? I'm still testing out both of them but am just curious what everyone else has decided on that have ran BBP's tunes way longer than I have. Currently running on their 91/93 tune with 93 octane fuel. Not sure I feel a huge difference in performance (not that there is much of a difference anyway, maybe 15 HP and torque extra, emphasis on maybe), but I like that most brands have better additives in their premium fuel than 87/89. My concern is deciding if the 91/93 tune and 93 octane fuel is worth the extra cost of fuel over the course of a year. Figuring that I'm paying an extra $0.70/gallon each fuel up, that's almost an extra $1,200 in fuel per year to go from 87 to 93 (roughly, if my math is correct).

 

 

Also, I'm finding random spikes of 2°-4° knock ****** on 93 octane, but they're random, like once every 5-10 minutes. It goes back down to 0° and holds steady. I'm going to assume this is false KR. I tried to do some light research but some stuff I've read has felt anecdotal. Rather common in my readings are the false KR spikes due to road noise, loud exhausts, and just basic things like a door shutting although I'm not opening and shutting my door on the freeway either. ? Could use some insight from more knowledgeable members on what to look for in monitoring KR with different fuel brands and ratings. I'll have to go back to the 87/89 tune with 89 octane and monitor the KR, didn't think of doing that during my first few fill ups.

Justin from blackbear street tuned my truck in person. 
While analyzing the stock tune data......  

I quote “wow you’re not getting any knock, you have good gas in nj”

 

i have a 6.2 and was using 93. Considering he’s probably read more Live LT knock sensors than anyone in the world, it’s probably pretty accurate to say most people with stock 6.2’s are getting knock and pulling timing on 93!

 

He highly recommended I stay with 93 for the tune.

 

I don’t think the brand of fuel matters at all for knock. i think the quality is regional.

 

He said DC area has the best fuel.

 

Yeah filling with premium sucks. I probably get the worst mpg on the forum because of the dense suburbia I live in. If I had a 5.3 I would try to go lower octane, but with a 6.2 your stuck with 93 imo.

 

 

xSHIFTxNASTYx Enthusiast

xSHIFTxNASTYx

Posted
  • Author
Posted
12 minutes ago, truckguy82 said:

Yeah filling with premium sucks. I probably get the worst mpg on the forum because of the dense suburbia I live in. If I had a 5.3 I would try to go lower octane, but with a 6.2 your stuck with 93 imo.

I probably should have noted that I have the 5.3L motor so there is no need to run 93. I just like the idea of being tuned to run 93. Like I said before about cost to performance, since there is no NEED to run 93, I will probably stick with the 87/89 tune on good 89 gas.

 

Your point about it being good gas I have read on other tuner's forums as well, like Diablo and such, that they've stated they can tell on log files when someone switches gas brands due to changes in KR, specifically Shell 93 apparently being a culprit behind weird timings and KR because of their additives. It was Shell 93 that I was logging on as I frequent Shell gas in my area quite a bit more than other gas brands.

 

I'm almost empty so I will fill up a half tank of 89, run it out, then fill it up and see what kind of KR I get on 89. I initially had 87 in the tank when I loaded the 87/89 tune so I didn't really pay attention to my monitors.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,960
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    doylej24
    Newest Member
    doylej24
    Joined

  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 766 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Chuck FB
      Tire psi

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      Ok I missed that part that yours is a GM. The strange part is that the choice for year ranges and within the year of 2026 is different on the Sierra then on the Chev for some reason as I am looking at my tool at the Sierra choices. Now I am guessing you see as to your sensor part number as it may be different on your truck for some reason and a call to GM should get you the part model number of the sensors you should have as well as which MHz your sensors are. I know mine are the ones as per what I listed but there are other choices in the Autel and got me wondering if by some chance they put different ones in your truck. Having said that, did you try using each of the choices starting from No 1 and going on down the list, not sure if that would mean shutting off the engine each time and resetting the tool and going at it again each time. Also I thought of something else which may sound retarded but if there was some stupid chance that the chev choice would work. The reason I say that is that the Sierra is showing a range up to 06/2026 for the various choices of sensors it could be where as the Chev has one choice that has that 12/2026. By the way it is possible to not run the truck and you may know that as per not pressing the brake but pressing and holding the start button for a few seconds and it lights up the dash ( its called service mode ) but that sucks battery power and if it were me doing it that way I would be throwing on a decent sized battery charger before doing it that way as killing your battery won't make you happy at me at all !.    Like I say, just a thought to try the Chev choices if you have already exhausted the Sierra choices but first it would be nice to know for sure what exact sensor model and hertz your truck uses as I assume only those choices that mention the sensor would work unless a choice that does not mention the sensor model would somehow work. Its frustrating when one is trying to use tools like this without the experience of the tool and the vehicle, as I am sure dealer techs themselves struggle with it when starting out or a new model year comes along that is slightly different. 
    • jgaudet99
      Tire psi

      By jgaudet99 · Posted

      I tried before I updated the scan tool just incase an update messed it up, but it never worked so I updated the scan tool and it still didn't work.   Only difference is I click on Sierra not Chevrolet cause I have a Sierra.   If I click on 2026-2024 I didn't have any option to change placard, when I click on 2023 it does give me the option but when I try to do it,.it says vehicle not supported!   I have my region or market or whatever it is set to America I think, is that what yours is set to?
    • Chuck FB
      Tire psi

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      Its just that it worked on 2024 trucks on this forum and my 2025 model truck, unless GM did something since that point to screw up access or Autel has a bad update. I haven't had need to use my tool since last year when I did the changes to the placard pressure settings and since then I updated the software on my Autel but have not plugged into the OBD so hard to say if I would get a surprise as well.    All I know last year when I bought the Autel I was warned to be sure to update it before I tried using the unit as they said who knows how long ago unit itself was actually manufactured as the software could be way out of date. 
    • Chuck FB
      Tire psi

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      And so you had gone through the process of registering and updating the tool and so on ?. All I can say is that on the front page as the tool fires up you go to advanced mode, then vehicle model comes up and you choose Silverado ( not the DRW or EV  since your a single rear wheel ) , then I think its choice 2 which is 07/2021 - 12/2026 ( 433mhz 13542523 ) as that is the series of tpms sensors and then go down to choice 5 which is tire type/pressure selection. Hit yes and it says to connect to OBD port and turn ignition on.    Having said this, I updated the software in my tool lately and these year range choices look different from the past due to them doing some updates it would appear and I have not connected up to the OBD port since last year so hopefully I am not in for a surprise with them screwing up the software and that it won't work on my truck anymore either.    So my question is, when you plugged into the OBD and started your truck it had that message on the Autel screen "vehicle not supported" ?. That does seem odd as tire shops would be pissed right off if hey can't use their tool on the model year after mine that in theory is supposed to be much the same truck ... unless GM did some change in the computer system to block certain things from access. 
    • Atlas
      Tire psi

      By Atlas · Posted

      Understanding and using modern scan tools is its own body of knowledge. I had little hope that would work...programming access to the BCM is probably required and that is not easy for us consumers. Expensive scan tool, GM programming subscription, online authentication, etc.   It also may be a matter of finding the right dealer to program it for you. Flashing a modern BCM might be a little too advanced for most tire shops.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...