Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I recently purchased a 2020 silverado RST. When I remote start the seats do not heat but the steering wheel does telling me its cold enough (Minnesota) when I turn the truck on and manually hit the heated seats they work fine. Yes the setting is correct for seats to come on with remote start. Its at the dealer and they cannot figure it out,  telling me they will touch base with GM and see if there is an update...

 

Anybody else have this issue? 

Posted

Are you sure it's not just the indicator light not coming one? 

Not sure about the latest programming, but earlier ones the seat would heat, but the light won't come on....and when the key was turned the heated stuff would shut off.

 

Not sure if this has been changed for the new style.

Posted
5 minutes ago, redwngr said:

Are you sure it's not just the indicator light not coming one? 

Not sure about the latest programming, but earlier ones the seat would heat, but the light won't come on....and when the key was turned the heated stuff would shut off.

 

Not sure if this has been changed for the new style.

The seat is ice cold, definitely not heating while the steering wheel is heating. 

Posted

If it's anything like the K2s, the heated seats are on the lowest setting when using remote start, and shut off when you put the key in (or, in your case, push the Start button.)  Then you have to turn them on manually.  I only really notice it on really cold days when the truck's been warming for a bit.  Are your seats leather?  Those take forever to warm up.

 

The steering wheel only has one setting and heats up much quicker than the seats.  That's why it's very noticeable.

Posted

How long do you have it started before you jump in.  If you jump under 5 minutes of running you're not going to notice it.  I have clothes seats in mine, leather will definitely take longer to feel that the heater is on

Posted
38 minutes ago, Salsa De Piña said:

If it's anything like the K2s, the heated seats are on the lowest setting when using remote start, and shut off when you put the key in (or, in your case, push the Start button.)  Then you have to turn them on manually.  I only really notice it on really cold days when the truck's been warming for a bit.  Are your seats leather?  Those take forever to warm up.

 

The steering wheel only has one setting and heats up much quicker than the seats.  That's why it's very noticeable.

^^^This.  Remote start and heated seats have been discussed at length for the K2's and it's just a fact that while they are turned on when remote started, it is on low and with no butt sitting in it to hold the heat in there is just not much heating effect. The newer heated seats are no where near as good at heating as the older vehicles since they go for more "efficient" stuff now. 

Posted (edited)

No issues.  My butt is plenty warm.  

 

Do I understand you right....the setting IS on in preferences, and even the dealership confirms they aren't working and cannot figure it out???

 

Weird!

Edited by fsuboy75
Posted (edited)

Yes seats are leather, yes the setting is on and yes the dealer confirmed its not heating but they probably didn't let it warm up very long? 

 

I'll try remote starting it until it shuts off to see if they warm up any. That really sucks if thats the case, all my other vehicles warm up very fast and get very hot...

Edited by vette10r
Posted

After five minutes I can tell the seat warmer has been on.  Not as warm as the steering wheel.  If you have an infrared temperature gauge to test before you start it and after it has been running for awhile to truly see they're not working.  My 2018 ram definitely got the seats hotter than this truck, but when you turn the warmers on this truck manually, these warmers definitely get warmer than the ram

Posted

Ok guys I remote started her and let it run the 15 minutes till she shut off and ran out and checked.  The seats were both heating just not as much as I would like. My previous truck would have them red hot in about 5 minutes.  Im a little disappointed but not the end of the world. The 6.2L 10 speed makes up for the little things!! Haha 

 

Thanks for the help!

Posted

If I put a towel or blanket over the seat when I get out the seats are much warmer after a remote start. It keeps the heat loss to air a minimum. I also think it's just like my 2015 and they come on at lowest setting with remote start.

 

Jay

Posted

When you remote start the truck and the heated seat feature is turned on in settings the heated seats turn off when you enter the truck. 

Posted

Hi neighbor!   I’m in Wisconsin.  
My 2019 TB does the same thing.
I brought her to the dealer over this.  They confirmed the info the other posters gave you...the heated seats turn on but don’t get hot. Leather here too.   They demonstrated with the infrared heat checker thingy (my official name for it lol.). I agree it’s a bummer. It’s unnaturally cold this year!  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,189 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...