Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Strange electrical issues? Random codes appearing? Truck going through batteries?

 

May be your battery cables.

 

Here’s how to check them.

 

You’re going to need:

 

-A digital volt meter set to mV

 

-An assistant

 

137a528ab5bfe8ce363a07773997e032.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Step one

Have your assistant put your truck in ‘clear flood mode’

To do this your assistant will need to depress the brake and accelerator pedal all the way to the floor.

What this does is turns off the injectors, so your truck will crank and crank and crank and not start which is how to perform this test.

d455b9cbadf04363e5e7aa0425255168.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

Step two

Let’s check the positive mini cable first

Put your meter between the bolt on the positive mini jumper cable and the end of it where it bolts onto the battery fuse block.

Have your assistant crank the truck (or press the start button) while having the truck in clear flood mode as previously discussed.

If the mV reading is around 100 or more, needs replacement.

1a50495b4f0e6e4dc80c4c5de3a0d141.jpg

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Step three

Ok now we’re onto the negative cable.

Put your meter between the start of the negative cable at the battery and a good ground. I personally use the 15mm alternator mounting bolt. I’ve taken off the air intake for this photo but that isn’t required.

Have your assistant crank your truck again in clear flood mode.

This test, anything close to or over 200mV fails the negative cable and it would need to be replaced.

53ce425b456f8d1eabf6d0589c80d76d.jpg

  • Like 3
Posted

That’s it.

Try this test hot and cold. Or if you’re lucky try the test when your truck has just been acting up. Most likely you’ll find one or both cables fails the test, and you’ll have an explanation for why the truck has been acting strange.

Examples:
Service power steering
Random U code DTCs
Low battery message with good battery
You keep replacing batteries and alternators
Slow crank randomly
Door locks cycling randomly
Radio screen randomly blank
Truck not maintaining KAM or ‘keep alive memory’- so when it sits and you start up it’s like you just disconnected the battery and resets the window learn and HVAC setting and things

I hope this helps!

-GM technician

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks for this post. Good info.

 

Question:

How do you keep the truck "IN" clear flood mode? (Is this keeping your feet on the brake & gas pedal?)

 

Is there anything special to get out of clear flood mode? (Just foot off of gas pedal?)

 

What is you have another bad ground some where else? Like the (2) grounds in the dash L & R.

 

Or bad body ground that's close to the starter?

 

I'm just curious IF they play into this test? Several videos on Youtube showing these fixes.

 

 

Posted

Keep both feet depressed on the pedals when cranking.

 

Let off to get out of clear flood.

 

This post is about bad battery cables and how to test them.

 

I’ve never seen bad dash grounds. Never fixed them. And I work on 5-10 vehicles a day.

 

There is no body ground near the starter.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Thanks! 

I have been getting a service stabilitrack on the DIC randomly on startup. Disappears quickly before i can Dismiss. Happens randomly once or twice every few months, only during startup.

Posted (edited)

I had a very strange electrical issue with my 2019 Yukon that was extremely intermittent.  Upon rare startup not all of the HVAC and dash gauge electronics would work, the transmission would not engage any gear, and the power steering was non-existent.  Also service stabilitrak error, service power steering, etc. errors.  Turning off/restarting maybe a half dozen times would "cure" the problem and then it wouldn't appear again for maybe 6 weeks.  Happened twice to me in January and February of 2020.

Dealership was advised by GM to replace the ECM last March, but simultaneously they also found a major ground on the frame behind the passenger front wheel well "full of undercoating."

Might want to check that ground yourselves as well.  I can see how that would fool you into believing your negative battery cables had high internal resistance.  I'm not ultimately sure which of the 2 issues was mainly at fault, but either way in 9 months I haven't had this issue return (knock on wood!)

 

PS - After receiving my Yukon back in March earlier this year after it was at the dealer for about 5-6 weeks, I investigated this ground connection further and cleaned it up better than the tech did.  Once re-installed I painted over it with black paint on the frame since some of the wax undercoating was disturbed in that area.

I posted a thread about these issues here starting in January 2020, feel free to have a look:

 

https://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/233496-2019-gmc-yukon-no-trans-gears-no-tachometer-no-oil-pressure-no-power-steering-second-time/#comments

Edited by BlaineBug
  • Like 1
Posted

That’s your negative battery cable. That’s what you’re talking about.

Frame undercoating for that ground isn’t that big of deal typically because every single truck made has that undercoating.

The better way to repair your truck would’ve been to go ahead and replace that cable. Goes from the battery negative down the firewall then splits into two, one bolts to the block in front of the starter and one goes to the frame where you’re talking about.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, BlaineBug said:

 

I posted a thread about these issues here before but for whatever reason I can't find it in my subscribed topics anymore.  Maybe it's been quiet for too long?

Look through your posting history, you should find it

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, tlaw91 said:

That’s your negative battery cable. That’s what you’re talking about.

Frame undercoating for that ground isn’t that big of deal typically because every single truck made has that undercoating.

The better way to repair your truck would’ve been to go ahead and replace that cable. Goes from the battery negative down the firewall then splits into two, one bolts to the block in front of the starter and one goes to the frame where you’re talking about.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I believe the dealership "may" have checked resistance on the cables.  Possibly.  Apparently the only U codes present kept leading back to loss of communication between some other modules on the ECM.  The local techs were in communication with the "escalated" GM TAC helpline and they came to that conclusion.

 

However it doesn't seen normal for there to be undercoating between the ground lug on the cable and the frame.  Shouldn't that be cleaned away before installing the cable?  That's the practice I've always followed when installing a ground.  Make sure paint is ground away between mating surface, etc.

 

Also since it was still under warranty being a 2019 I let them do all of the diagnostic work.  Everyone one the forums was telling me the battery was getting bad - the only thing I did personally was take it to 3 different places to be tested and the battery passed every time.

Edited by BlaineBug
Posted

What should the cables be testing at if they are good? Below 200 for the neg. and below 100 for the positive? Lower the better?

Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, txab said:

Look through your posting history, you should find it

Found it, if you care to have a read.  Not to distract from this thread but perhaps the symptoms and root causes are related.  The electronics in the 2014-2019 Silverado and Sierra are identical to the 2015-2020 Tahoe, Yukon, Suburban, and Escalade.

Edited by BlaineBug

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...