Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

So installed the pulsar LT on my 19 6.2L 10 Speed and I'm either confused or happy.  Adjusted the tire size to get the speedometer corrected.  Still a bit off from GPS, but not by much.  Original tires were 275/50/R22 which translates to 32.83 inches, now running 37 inch tires.  Only about 1 or 2 mphs off throughout the entire range, which I believe is acceptable.

 

Secondly decided to disable DFM out of curiosity more than anything.  Some things I noticed:

  • I have an AFE cat back exhaust:
    • The Suburu drone is gone!
  • When configuring:
    • Electronic step rails went crazy
      • In/Out randomly and including full extension (for bed access assistance)
      • Went away after starting vehicle.
  • The MPG is reporting better than with DFM enabled:
    • Like 5 MPG better in the 50 mile sample.
      • Going to need to get a full tank and take the mileage to verify on paper.

 

Anybody else get better MPG with DFM disabled?  Or is it lying to me?

 

EDIT: MPG has normalized.  Getting 11-13 mpg local, 15-18 mpg highway.

Edited by clowe1243
Update
Posted

I've been using the Pulsar for about a month now and I'm loving it. I'm seeing about a 1.5 mpg loss but I'm also working through some issues with my Rotofab install. I am seeing my mpg go back up and we'll see if I get into the positive number. I have a Magnaflow catback exhaust and the the drone is gone. 

Posted
1 hour ago, clowe1243 said:

 

  • The MPG is reporting better than with DFM enabled:
    • Like 5 MPG better in the 50 mile sample.

Not even close to representive data, report back an average after 6 tank fills.

Posted
3 hours ago, clowe1243 said:

 

 

Secondly decided to disable DFM out of curiosity more than anything.  Some things I noticed:

  • I have an AFE cat back exhaust:

I just want to know if you could swap the muffler from them and get near the same results.  1400 is a bit steep

https://afepower.com/afe-power-49c44114-apollo-gt-series-3-409-stainless-steel-muffler-upgrade

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Rob Mugs said:

I just want to know if you could swap the muffler from them and get near the same results.  1400 is a bit steep

https://afepower.com/afe-power-49c44114-apollo-gt-series-3-409-stainless-steel-muffler-upgrade

 

The key is getting rid of that flapper.  I'd imagine it can't get any worse.  Cant even tune the 6.2L at a reasonable price atm.  Ive seen some guys that just lock the flapper open.  Make it sound tons better, but without disabling the dfm...your still gonna sound like a suburu.

Posted (edited)

Your MPG is "showing" better because your speedometer is correct now.  The truck didn't think you were driving as far before.  Also, you can get your speedometer dead on accurate.  The second number in the programming is 10ths of an inch.

 

-Eli

Edited by Tjeli
  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, clowe1243 said:

The key is getting rid of that flapper.  I'd imagine it can't get any worse.  Cant even tune the 6.2L at a reasonable price atm.  Ive seen some guys that just lock the flapper open.  Make it sound tons better, but without disabling the dfm...your still gonna sound like a suburu.

I might cut the flapper first and then do the muffler

Posted
On 1/13/2021 at 9:00 AM, RRonin said:

I've been using the Pulsar for about a month now and I'm loving it. I'm seeing about a 1.5 mpg loss but I'm also working through some issues with my Rotofab install. I am seeing my mpg go back up and we'll see if I get into the positive number. I have a Magnaflow catback exhaust and the the drone is gone. 

Whats going on with the roto fab

Posted

I didn't torque down the hose clamps. Hose popped out after a 100 miles and my truck throw a code. 

Posted

The Suburu drone is gone! ?  yeah, can't explain it. I'm running 2 borla's in line and was still loud. So quiet now, why??  My running boards also spazzed out, all good. Only issue now is drivers side mirror keeps lighting up ghost vehicle alert.  maybe truck bug, not pulsar?

Posted
On 1/13/2021 at 10:25 AM, clowe1243 said:
  • The MPG is reporting better than with DFM enabled:
    • Like 5 MPG better in the 50 mile sample.
      • Going to need to get a full tank and take the mileage to verify on paper.

 

Anybody else get better MPG with DFM disabled?  Or is it lying to me?

 

EDIT: MPG has normalized.  Getting 11-13 mpg local, 15-18 mpg highway.

 

  • 1 month later...
Posted

New weirdness.  My drivers side left floorboard stays open until the truck internally times out, or I start driving above 3 MPH.

  • 3 months later...
Posted
On 1/16/2021 at 10:59 PM, RRonin said:

I didn't torque down the hose clamps. Hose popped out after a 100 miles and my truck throw a code. 

on mine almost the same but it was my filter i got the corsa intake came of and thew a code now it wont respond the same on the level 5 even with the new filter on i don’t know if it messed up my pulsar lt or what 

Posted

On my trailboss custom 6.2 I ended up never getting it where I liked it. Throttle sensitivity when I plaid with that made the upper gears shirt funny. And when I disabled dfm it also disabled decel fuel cutoff when I let off the throttle when scanning the truck. Plus truck had onstar issues unless I enabled dfm. So for me I wasn’t happy enough to keep it. Just my 2 cents.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

So what I’m hearing is the Pulsar is an overpriced “investment” that may or may not make a DFM truck run better, but there’s a high chance of computer glitches. 
 

It’s bad enough that the guys at Range Technology won’t even make us a simple DFM disable (6.2 10-speed), but instead they release our only option - the Pulsar LT. However, it’s way more expensive AND not even reliable. 
 

Such BS.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The whole story is false. The screw is there as a temporary fix to allow the pump to even turn on. When the nozzle is returned the pump shuts off.. At this point people are just being punked   https://youtu.be/1DtlaEuHXAA?si=06mrRmw9HLUwdeRk   https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1CyRZdsaSc/ https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1DxV1Hyrqi/       SNOPES: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19HPYUnRik/
    • Follows the motif on the Sierra EV.  Satin finsh to the lower bumper area, painted above:   Elevation       Denali      
    • Not exactly what I was hoping for, but I do like it. I wonder if they'll bring back Smokey Quartz Metallic? 🤔 https://gmauthority.com/blog/2026/06/here-is-the-all-new-2027-gmc-sierra-1500/
    • Whoever greenlighted the work truck matte black front bumpers on every trim but the AT4X should be fired!  I was hoping that was an AI mistake, but just realized they were on every model of the 2027 Silverado too.     Some parts of the interior do look premium, but the Denali Ultimate dashboard looks like an afterthought.  At least they appear to have lost the microfiber the high end Silverado models showed, but the '27 High Country dash looks better than the Denali.  
    • New member here. I am researching a read-first event-recorder concept for late-model GM V8 trucks. This is not a sales post. There is no product link, price, preorder, or mailing list. I am trying to determine whether the underlying problem is real before building anything.   Has your truck ever had a brief problem such as: - rough running or a momentary misfire - an oil-pressure warning or unusual pressure event - reduced power or a brief stall - a U-code or lost-communication problem - a symptom that disappeared before the dealer or independent shop could reproduce it   If so, I would appreciate the following details: - year, model, engine, and mileage - what happened and under what conditions - whether a DTC and useful freeze-frame data were stored - whether the shop was able to reproduce it - what the eventual confirmed repair was, if known - what additional information would have helped the diagnosis   The concept being evaluated is a removable leave-in recorder that continuously retains a rolling window from before and after an event. It would not tune, reflash, clear codes, or change the vehicle calibration.   I am also not claiming that it could predict lifter failure or see every internal ECM variable.   The real question is whether continuous event history would add enough useful evidence beyond freeze frame, GDS2, and existing scan tools — or whether it would simply be another unnecessary gadget.   For owners and technicians, which problem would make something like this genuinely useful: 1. intermittent misfire or AFM/DFM-related behavior 2. oil-pressure events 3. lost communication or electrical faults 4. none of the above Please be blunt. Negative feedback is just as useful as positive feedback.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...