Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
15 minutes ago, grandpalarry777 said:

It is part of the MyCar system. Not sure why it is on the vehicle without your knowing about it.

https://www.amazon.ca/MyCar-Interface-Module-Remote-Control/dp/B01MQKOBIA

 

 

image.jpeg.9d612a58ad306ffb69e3689c4766ac9b.jpeg

I talked to the MyCar company and they checked the serial number against their records and said it was not theirs.  They told me that the part in the photo is used by a lot of  companies and the best thing to do is contact the original dealer to see if they added it.

Posted

I know, right? This is Twilight Zone weird ...

 

Makes me wonder if this is GM's latest brainstorm - a spying device - to cut down on warranty claims ... ?

Posted

I think the dealer is lying or it is a dealer trade and they did not know. It sure ain't factory.

OP, what dealer is listed on the window sticker? Is it where you bought it?

  • Like 1
Posted

Now this begs another question - did you buy an extended warranty through the dealership? If so, I believe we've just discovered the reason it's there.

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, tbarn said:

I think the dealer is lying or it is a dealer trade and they did not know. It sure ain't factory.

OP, what dealer is listed on the window sticker? Is it where you bought it?

The vehicle was originally delivered to a dealer in Victoria, TX in Nov 2020.  Then it was transferred to a dealer near Dallas.  Then it was transferred to my dealer in San Antonio, TX.  When I got the vehicle in Jan 2021, it had 215 miles on it.  So, one of the first two dealers added this device.  I will call them later today to find out what they know.

Edited by BigBruce
Posted

Looking at MyCar website it appears to be a 3rd party device that adds some features that may or may not be part of the vehicle's factory devices.   Not sure why all the "big brother hysteria" though.  It has a simple plug-in connector and is out in the open so that it can be seen easily.  Looks like there is zero effort applied to hide it.  The MyCar website has enough information for you to figure out how to use it for whatever is not already part of the OEM equipment.

If you were to contact the dealership that installed it, you could find out what the advantage is for the buying customer.  It may simply be a way for the credit company to keep tabs on THEIR vehicle.  Purchasing a near $100k (in Canada) vehicle with cash is hardly the norm for new vehicle purchasers.  

Posted

I don't think there is a whole lot of function the aftermarket can add to a Denali.

  • Like 1
  • 8 months later...
Posted
On 1/26/2021 at 3:23 PM, BigBruce said:

I have a 2021 GMC Denali Sierra short bed pick up truck. It is only a few weeks old and I have discovered a device connected to the OBD2 port which the dealer cannot explain. It is the size of a Pack of gum, and it has a light on it. Does anyone know what this is for. I have added nothing to the truck.

I took the truck to the dealer and they had no idea what it is, and they did not install it.  I took a picture of the device and looked up the part number on the internet.  The device is a cell phone based MyCar remote tracking, remote start, remote door opener.  Now I need to find out who installed it and why.  

MYSTERY SOLVED-- The previous dealer installed it as a secondary source of vehicle data reported to the dealership.  They install it on all their vehicles.  My dealer said they would remove it.

Thanks for all the suggestions.

image.thumb.png.f42f892eb2078fae4242ffc716b7b524.pngimage.thumb.png.30e4627e33a9ff5b2712dfac0ec534c2.png

 

 

Did your remote start stop working after you removed this? I have a 21 Chevy Trail Boss and remote start from the Chevy app stopped working for me. 

  • 5 months later...
Posted

I just purchased a 2022 2500HD. I am getting the same alert in the myGMC app, “Unable to retrieve diagnostic data…remove any attached devices from the diagnostic port and try again”.  This truck has the same device installed. Pretty sure it is related to a “SafePoint GPS” system. They tried to sell me a three year plan. Opted out because if the truck is stolen, I don’t want it back. Looks like they installed the system anyway. SafePoint appears to be a tool dealerships use to track vehicles stolen from their lots, and likely a tool to track for repossession purposes. To remove it, it looks like the OBD2 port will have to be replaced. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 286,740 Mile Services   8/6/2026   New AC Compressor. Refrigerant oil and dye, evacuate and charge system.  New exhaust system from cat back.  New Iridium plugs plus replace #3 coil Repair/rewire headlamp wiring (passenger side) and replace all forward bulbs. Polish lenses of both assemblies.  Pull rear rotors, clean and adjust parking assembly. Inspect, clean and grease front calipers. Check pads and shoes.  4 wheel power bleed of brake system. Dot 4 Reset idle speed 50 rpm higher New Serpentine belt.    Will need new pads in the rear in about 5K more miles.    Tax Title and License out the door just short of a grand.    AC clutch had bitten the dust. 1 year warranty on the pick and save replacement. Thing will make a Polar Bear cry Uncle.  He spent quite some time on the wiring. It was in the harness and he does nothing half. I got off cheap. I have considerable more light down the road. Sylvania Silver Star replacements.  Gas seal between the porcelain and shell of plug #3 was blown, cooked the coil. That was the cold miss.  Love the new exhaust. I can sneak into the neighborhood again.  Nice to have a working parking brake again. Belle Tire never got it done. That was disappointing.    This was one of her bigger bills and still way cheaper than a payment even given the oil consumption. This thing cost me under a hundred a month in repairs and normal routine costs. What is my incentive to replace it? 🤔           
    • hello I recently bought a 2012 gmc 1500 with a 5.3 and have a AFM disabler on it I'm interested in doing a cam but I'm worried if I remove the AFM system I will fail smog does anyone have info if they are able to detect that or a work around to it (not talking about hot smogging) please let me know thank you  
    • Update. I started chasing down my symptoms. Started first with pulling valve covers and looked at everything. Everything looked good and couldn't hear or feel anything different. Then a compression test. 240 psi or really close on each cylinder. I was worried I was a tooth off of timing. Not bad for an engine with 173,000. Granted I did put new heads on. I sprayed water around the injector area to see if I could hear a change. Nothing. I hooked up my new hp tuner which I should have done in the first place but I don't really know what I'm looking at just yet but am learning. I noticed the fuel trims were way off so that told me I have to have either a bad injector or exhaust leak. New injectors, so I did the shop vac on blower and in the tail pipe. Sprayed soapy water and found the exhaust flange on the drivers side was leaking. I didn't think it would be that considereding I pulled the heads and left the manifolds attached. I did have the transmission replaced not long ago. They must have not seated them properly but I guess I didn't notice. I put in new gaskets on both sides. Which by the way isn't a bad job but I had a hard time getting them to seal right. Took two attempts. Reset the fuel trims and the ticking is gone, engine runs smooth and acceleration has improved. Got to feel the real difference with that stage 1 cam. It's not that big of a difference but it does add a little more. It feels like how the truck should have been from the factory.
    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...