Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Has anyone tried to add the HUD to your 1500?  Doing some research and found the 2015, but I'm not sure if the dash pad has changed, the HUD is a different PN.  I am going by the 2020 PN.  I cannot verify the part numbers for the 2021 since the fiche like lead you to the accessories catalogue.  I started with - 2015 Silverado with HUD retrofit/upgrade. - 2014 - 2019 Silverado & Sierra - GM-Trucks.com (gm-trucks.com)

 

I am Looking at the following PNs:

Mount Bracket: 23407367                                           $65
Driver Information Display Switch: 84456360          $31
Instrument Cluster: 84804721                                    $412
Instrument Panel: 84553050                                       $280   Has dash panel, HUD trim bezel, and mounting strip
Cluster Visor: 84054788                                               $70 Designed for HUD
Head-up Display: 84395830                                         $510
Reinforced Beam Deflector: 23387335                      $10
Outlet Duct: 23391609                                                  $24  - I think this allows you to keep the Drivers side left defroster
Windshield: 84398043                                                 $394
 
Maybe:
Reinforced Beam: 23387334                                       $339 -  Possible has bracket tabs for HUD - Alleviating the need to remove Driver side defrost vent.  - Might be able to add own brackets.
 
WAM VIN Programmed                                                $200 + &80 round shipping
Phil’s custom harness                                                  $150 -2014 - 2018 Silverado / Sierra - HUD Retrofit Harness - Harness Dr. - DIY Done Right  
 
* Phil is designing  a 2021 HUD Harness
 
I have probably missed some things - Like where to mount HUD controls and what bracket is needed.
These above PNs are gleaned off of a 2020 GMC Denali 1500, not a 2021.  Can anyone verify that the PNs remain the same for 2021?
 
Thanks I appreciate the help and meeting you all.  
Wayne
 
 
Updated:  18 April 2021

 

Edited by Thompyt88
Added information
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

FYI.  If you were polarized sunglasses, you won't be able to see the HUD.  My ZL1 has a HUD and I barely use it, never use it on the street because I wear polarized glasses and never use it at night..  I've used it at the road course a couple of times but never really paid attention to it.

 

Calling the dealer or going by and giving them the parts numbers and ask them if they are the same as a 2021 would be the best thing to do.

Edited by Vigilante375
Posted

Good points on dealer.  Giving my VIN wouldn't help.  Giving PNs to parts guy would.  I am used to HUD.  Had it on a C6 and a C7.  

 

Thanks all

Posted

Depends on how clear you want the HUD to be.  I had no issues with my C6 and non-HUD windshield.  But I did eventually replace it.  I was of the understanding that a tint would achieve the same results.    I hear you though.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I used the following PNs:

Mount Bracket: 23407367                                           $65
Driver Information Display Switch: 84456360           $31
Instrument Cluster: 84804721                                    $412
Instrument Panel: 84553050                                      $280   Has dash panel, HUD trim bezel, and mounting strip
Cluster Visor: 84054788                                             $70 Designed for HUD
Head-up Display: 84395830                                      $510
Outlet Duct: 23391609                                                $24  - Allows you to keep the Drivers side left defroster
Windshield: 84398043                                                $394   (Not used at this time)
 
WAM VIN Programmed                                                $200 + &80 round shipping
Phil’s custom harness                                                  $150 -2014 - 2018 Silverado / Sierra - HUD Retrofit Harness - Harness Dr. - DIY Done Right 
 
All worked well.  Phil's harness works like a charm. There is only 1 screw point to the frame for the HUD bracket.   I used some Ebay parts so the prices was lower.  Best bet is to get dash from GM since parts yards want 150 to ship.  It has a bit less in the display options as compared to a C7 Corvette.
  • 2 months later...
Posted
On 6/15/2021 at 1:14 PM, Thompyt88 said:

I used the following PNs:

Mount Bracket: 23407367                                           $65
Driver Information Display Switch: 84456360           $31
Instrument Cluster: 84804721                                    $412
Instrument Panel: 84553050                                      $280   Has dash panel, HUD trim bezel, and mounting strip
Cluster Visor: 84054788                                             $70 Designed for HUD
Head-up Display: 84395830                                      $510
Outlet Duct: 23391609                                                $24  - Allows you to keep the Drivers side left defroster
Windshield: 84398043                                                $394   (Not used at this time)
 
WAM VIN Programmed                                                $200 + &80 round shipping
Phil’s custom harness                                                  $150 -2014 - 2018 Silverado / Sierra - HUD Retrofit Harness - Harness Dr. - DIY Done Right 
 
All worked well.  Phil's harness works like a charm. There is only 1 screw point to the frame for the HUD bracket.   I used some Ebay parts so the prices was lower.  Best bet is to get dash from GM since parts yards want 150 to ship.  It has a bit less in the display options as compared to a C7 Corvette.

I have successfully  installed the WAMS cluster, harness, and upgraded the steering wheel to get audio controls functional.  I have ordered the Head-Up Display from Nordstromauto and HUD harness from HarnessDr.

 

Wanting to confirm something before I pull the trigger on ordering remaining list.  Following a couple of the parts list, they all reference the w/o HUD cluster visor.   I 'm grateful for the shared info and advise. 

 

Is the cluster visor the correct part number for the HUD? 

Soft touch, without head-up display, black. With leather, without head-up display black.

Should I get?:

 

Soft touch, with head-up display, black. With leather, with head-up display black.

 

Thank you,

Chad

Posted

Polarized glasses will dim the HUD to your eyes but it's still visible.

  • 7 months later...
  • 2 years later...
  • 8 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,875 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...