Jump to content

5100 vs 5160 vs 6112 for AT4

Z71-K9
 Share

Recommended Posts

Z71-K9 Enthusiast

Z71-K9

Posted
Posted

I have a 2019 AT4 that I want to initially replace the rear shocks and then eventually replace the fronts.  I searched the site but its still not clear to me.  Who has to made this choice and why?

AJMBLAZER Enthusiast

AJMBLAZER

Posted
Posted

5100 is an improved monotube shock. 
 

5160 is basically the same shock but with a reservoir for more endurance when cycling the suspension rapidly. 
 

6112 is a bigger body monotube for those that use their stuff hard but don’t want to go full custom suspension. 

  • Thanks 1
Dunn Senior Enthusiast

Dunn

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

^^^^^ exactly.....

 

 

if your gonna go 4x4 on purpose than 6112 would be the call......if not than 5100s, its as simple as that

 

5160s are just rears for 6112 front setup......

Edited by Dunn
AJMBLAZER Enthusiast

AJMBLAZER

Posted
Posted

Eh, 5100's are great for most offroading that people do.

 

However, if you plan on going fast over rough terrain it's time to start spending money on better shocks and struts.

Grover67 Enthusiast

Grover67

Posted
Posted

I just picked a 6112 set for mine through Summit Racing this past week. Not installed yet.

 

-grover67

HapaTrailBoss Enthusiast

HapaTrailBoss

Posted
Posted

I have 6112 in the front and 5100 in the rear. The ride is more composed off and on road compared to the Ranchos. It was definitely a worthwhile investment.

rmac4 Enthusiast

rmac4

Posted
Posted

6112s up front and 5160s in the rear! Controls body sway much better and gives the truck a more planted feel.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • diyer2
      Navigating senior years.

      By diyer2 · Posted

      I'm looking at carpal tunnel surgery on my left hand and lumbar fusion. 
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      While waiting for parts I have been working on installing the AC compressor, new accumulator, and orifice tube. Also changed out the high side ball valve (original). The orifice tube that was in there wasn't too bad. Slightly dirty, a little bit of junk, but not blocked. Glad I changed it out.   The accumulator, which should have been a 5 minute job, may have just burned $50. Put some PAG in it, wrote the date and mileage on the side, fresh o-rings and gooey'd up the threads and rings with Nylog. Got everything connected and snugged and was going to vacuum down the system, and....   My manifold gauge won't fit on the port. It's not an R12 service port. It LOOKS like an R134 service port but the diameter is a hair too large. There's a sticker on the accumulator that says it's designed to be used with R12 and R134a systems only. So it's not R1234yf. Even if I reduced the diameter slightly with a file, the shoulder on the port is too large so the quick-connect valve won't lock on. I'm stumped. It's going back, and 50/50 on if they'll give me a refund.   Also, I did a fuel pressure test.... Key on, the gauge spikes to about 60psi and quickly bleeds off, like 2psi per second. The fuel isn't going into the plenum, no smell, starts fine, so I'm guessing there's a bad check valve in the pump and the fuel is just draining back into the tank. oh, hell. But, it shouldn't be a problem, pump primes just fine and the truck starts right up. It just means I can't really ever use fuel pressure to verify a leak at the injector or intake.
    • No F-bdy Bs
      SERCICE ESC message?

      By No F-bdy Bs · Posted

      Got this yesterday out of nowhere. Truck is a 25',6.6 gasser with 8k miles.  Only semi anomaly is that the truck had been sitting, uncranked for 6 days. Elec Stability Control showed immediately upon cranking, not while driving. No drivability issues, just the message. Battery didn't seem to be weak when cranking over.  I drove it, killed it, let it sit a few hrs with no avail.  Truck is 100% stock. No damage. 
    • newdude
      on-wheel cellphone control: 2026 1500 WT (2.7L 4WD std cab)

      By newdude · Posted

      This can be done.  It is not cheap and requires an instrument cluster swap with custom programming, new steering wheel with the controls on it, and a special jumper harness.   The cluster upgrade - 12.3” Digital Cluster Upgrade – 2022.5–2026 Silverado / Sierra (T1 Refresh Pickup) - WAMS   The wheel upgrade - Steering Wheel Upgrade Kit – 2022.5–2026 Silverado / Sierra (T1 Refresh Pickup) - WAMS   The column harness upgrade - 2019 - 2026 Silverado / Sierra: Steering Wheel LIN Bus Harness - Harness Dr. - DIY Done Right     The problem with doing all of this?  You pretty much can't have any programming done to your truck that involves the cluster ever again.  The dealer won't be able to program the cluster as GM's system will only pull data for the cluster the truck came with.  So it would be advised also to turn off over the air updates.   TLDR;  Should have bought an LT double cab?  You'd have a power seat, the wheel controls, the cluster, all things that you've been seeking in your various posts so far about your new WT regular cab.  
    • dna9656
      New to Me 2010 SLE (Quirks, Issues)

      By dna9656 · Posted

      I was unaware of that, thanks for updating me.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...