Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Anyone have one of these?  How do you like it?  I am trading in my 20 5.3 for a 21 6.2 TB and just realized it has this tailgate. I am worried it’s just another thing to go wrong. Also I have an ARE Z2 canopy I would like to transfer between the two trucks. Anyone have experience with the multiflex and a canopy?

Posted (edited)

I have the GMC version and what can go wrong?  Its operates as a normal t-gate if you never want to use the features.   Have a friend who drove 400 miles to get a Trail Boss that had it. 

Edited by elcamino
Posted

Just remember not to use it if you have a hitch connected. You will dent your tailgate. Seems like a nice feature for using you bed and getting in and out of your bed. 

Posted

I have had my AT4 for almost 2 months.  I use the MF tailgate multiple times a week.  Just being able to drop the inner gate is helpful for loading and unloading stuff in the bed.  The step is nice as well.  I haven't used it in the load stop positions yet.  

 

I don't leave a hitch in as I don't like the look, don't want it to rust to the receiver and I value my shins.  I also don't tow very often.

 

If you are loading stuff into the bed with ramps make sure you read the manual.  Either need to lower inner gate or distribute load across whole tailgate (manual explains better).

 

The MF tailgate will not power close.

 

I thought the MF tailgate was a gimmick until I used one. 

  • Like 2
Posted
3 hours ago, elcamino said:

I have the GMC version and what can go wrong?  Its operates as a normal t-gate if you never want to use the features.   Have a friend who drove 400 miles to get a Trail Boss that had it. 

Just a bunch more moving parts on something that used to be pretty simple. 

Posted (edited)

Was not an option I was looking for but the truck I found had everything else I wanted, I did not think I would like it at first but after about a month of ownership I find it every useful in loading. Closing the upper section is  a bit of a pain when fully open as you have to hold down on the gate and close it first or the complete gate tries to close making it awkward to close.

I'm over 65 so getting in the bed is not as easy as it was 20 years ago LOL.

Edited by WeGone
Posted

I think it would be useful but I would want a manual version, no handle and only an electronic button I don't see that working flawlessly in 5 years of regular use. Who in the world thought of the idea to power the truck tailgate down and up? I would do my best to avoid it unless it was mechanical but then again I have no problems getting in the truck with the side steps; and I have a separate extender anyways so most of the features are irrelevant and adds more complications and failure points...

 

Tyler

Posted
3 hours ago, blckblt said:

I thought the MF tailgate was a gimmick until I used one. 

This. I've only had the truck for days and I've already used it quite a bit. It's not perfect. It has some things that could have been designed better, but it gets used. I'd go for it.

Trail Boss.jpg

Posted

Anyone have any idea if the top of the tailgate is similar or close enough to the standard tailgate?  I see that ARE asked if you have a MF on their canopy selector but looking at images they look essentially the same up top.  I am really hoping that I am able to use my existing Z2 canopy from my 2020.

 

I will try to give ARE a call but they are pretty insulated with pushing people to their dealers.  Unfortunately at least in my area their dealers are not very helpful.

Posted
2 hours ago, Josef said:

Anyone have any idea if the top of the tailgate is similar or close enough to the standard tailgate?  I see that ARE asked if you have a MF on their canopy selector but looking at images they look essentially the same up top.  I am really hoping that I am able to use my existing Z2 canopy from my 2020.

 

I will try to give ARE a call but they are pretty insulated with pushing people to their dealers.  Unfortunately at least in my area their dealers are not very helpful.

I ordered a LSII toneau cover (not received yet 16 week lead time!) for my GMC Sierra with the Multi Pro tailgate and that was a specific ordering question with or without the Multi Pro tailgate.

Posted

Mine came with it, didn't think it was special.....but oh yeah it is....I use it almost everyday.....wouldn't buy another without it.... this is my 3rd T1 since 2019

Posted
On 6/4/2021 at 10:57 AM, WeGone said:

The only thing power is the locks.

The GMC MP tailgate is power deploying. I'd think the Chevy MF would be the same. 

Posted
1 hour ago, jlong1984 said:

The GMC MP tailgate is power deploying. I'd think the Chevy MF would be the same. 

 

It's slow opening, but not powered. The buttons power the tail gate release mechanism (unlocking) the gate to open.

Posted

I have the 2021 Trail Boss with the Multi-Pro tailgate and NOBODY makes a hard Tonneau cover for it. LEER is supposedly working on one. Talked to a dealer last week about the GM offered covers and was told that theirs would not work on the Multi-Pro tailgate. The reason was with the raised section of the cover in the drop down section of the gate. It would be so easy to make a replacement cover for the center section of the tailgate without the raised section and be able to use a cover made for a  crew cab truck.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Did the KYBs keep it the same height in the front? I was concerned that pre-assembled assembly would raise it up an inch to standard non-z60 height.. I guess which it would make the rake 1 inch instead of 2 inches.
    • Thank you for keeping the train on the tracks and for a thoughtful engagement. I enjoyed the reflection on a previous stance to refine and improve your position. I like that inquisitive flexibility about you Atlas.    No the process isn't sterile. Hundreds, perhaps thousands of miles of piping, vessels, pumps. Chevron, the people I worked for, were keenly aware that there is a market for what is known as their "ISOCLEAN" line of lubricants. These are lubricants that are the same as those sold bulk that are further processed by filtration to a level your particular application demands. They will filter and package and provide lab documentation as required. Do not kid yourself. Every gallon of oil that goes into a Chevron Turbine, reciprocating compressor, generator is prefiltered and tested before being charged. Lest wise it was when I was there in the plants I worked in.    There are requirements set by manufactures for the cleanliness of the oils used in their equipment. OTR such as CUMMINS has standards shared with customers on this. Commercial interest selling to Ma and Pa do, but don't share that information. Not even upon request but internally, they do exist.    The GM study sited, (Graph from Machinery Lubrication in previous post) only shows "relative" importance.  I find that fascinating. By constructing the graph like this they admit there are dozens of factors in engine life and via scientific method determined the effect of 'relative cleanliness' on engine life not in miles but in 'FACTORS'. This allows a certain amount of reverse engineering does it not?   They even provided some touchstones. Beta 75 as a reference point. Wonderful stuff!!   Smaller blenders CAN and some DO take the time and effort to do better than a refinery or large bulk blender, like Warren Oil, in improving the "in the can" cleanliness. No I don't have a list but testing could generate that information.    Again, but one of several levers we can pull to improve engine life. The simplest is keeping a clean work station while doing your own oil changes.     
    • Thank you. I'll give it a try 
    • I just spent the last 45K miles doing samples every oil change over more than a full year to get the data for seasons and break-in to broke in.    I found the same thing to be true. Something was always teetering on done or had stepped off the cliff long before the OLM was DOA. In fact, I found about a thousand mile difference between summer and winter. That is during the winter half the OLM was STILL too long. Even the severe schedule was to long in the winter.   Now having done the work I can say I was NOT DISAPOINTED. I saw nothing I didn't already know. Nothing my father hadn't already demonstrated in his 2K OCI's pushing dated iron on dated oils and weak filters to mileages well beyond 300K.   Building on his work through use of Lab testing it wasn't hard to find the correlation between 'sight/feel/odor, the things dad relied on, and test results. Use of current viscosity stable chemistries & filters has pushed that marker for my motors out to 3K summer, 4K winter.    So the early lies were 3K on conventional oil and the lie upon the lie was 7K+. turns out to be off by a factor of two.    So... it is true that modern chemistry has doubled the useful oil life. But the base milage that came from was off by double. It's how good lies work. Partly true, sometimes mostly true so that your meter isn't set off. It also means that non-shear-stable shelf oils are only now as good as the old oils were in their best case scenario.    So the question now is how do we improve on that? Thus the question into cleanliness among the other items listed in the post quoted below.    If this bores you, feel free not to participate.       
    • Is it though?  Like LTZ, not a high take rate.  Current Sierra has AT4, Denali and Elevation as its main bread winners.  Each trim accounting for 25-35% of sales for Sierra.  SLT makes up about 10-15% at best.        Like others have predicted here for GMC, it will be:   - Pro (equal to WT Chevy)   - Elevation (replaces SLE and SLT)   - AT4 (and X)   - Denali (and Ultimate).  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...