Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I noticed in the new Silverado cat commercial, (35sec) that full tailgate and inner seem to open together in one motion. Doesn't seem to work on my Sierra. Is this possible or just the way it's set up for the ad? 

 

Edited by cansno
Posted (edited)

You have to hit both buttons almost simultaneously or once the gate has started to drop hit the mid gate button.  Gate button then immediately the flex gate button.  I've got that to work that way maybe twice.  

 

The gates are physically the same Chevy/GMC for the flex gates.

Edited by newdude
  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, newdude said:

You have to hit both buttons almost simultaneously or once the gate has started to drop hit the mid gate button.  Gate button then immediately the flex gate button.  I've got that to work that way maybe twice.  

 

Kinda what I figured. Would be great if say, a double button press would do this. I find quite often I have to fumble around finding the inner button when tailgate is down. Thks

Posted

This is a neat feature, but I really hope they offer a manual version, there is no way I want an electronically operated tailgate on my truck for 10+ years with the abuse I put it through. The regular tailgate works fine and plan to keep that but I hope my next truck in mid grade package doesn't have one of these power tailgates. Guess I could always sell it and make some cash? There has to be a market for these. 

 

Tyler 

Posted

Not exactly sure what you mean. Do you mean the top gate dropping automatically when it drops? Looking at the video a few times, it doesn't show how he opens it, just that it comes down. I don't know how it works, unless it's an added feature on the 2021. A friend has a 2020 Silverado, he has a feature on his that lifts and closes the tailgate. Sure would be a nice feature for the heavy multi pro tailgate on the Sierra.

 

Posted

I press the lower button first, then the upper button to open the tailgate like was shown in the video (good one at that).

 

With a little practice you get the hang of it. Not hard at all.

 

 

Posted
4 hours ago, Amcguy1970 said:

This is a neat feature, but I really hope they offer a manual version, there is no way I want an electronically operated tailgate on my truck for 10+ years with the abuse I put it through. The regular tailgate works fine and plan to keep that but I hope my next truck in mid grade package doesn't have one of these power tailgates. Guess I could always sell it and make some cash? There has to be a market for these. 

 

Tyler 


They are only power actuated latches. Nothing powers the movement of the tailgate sections.* Even the normal tailgate has a power actuated latch, so you can’t get away from it.

*Unless you have a high country that is power up and down. Not sure that any multiflex have power up and down though

Posted

love my multi flex.....when i bought it i was like eh, whatever it came with the truck but i use it almost everday.......especially since mine is lifted a few inches it really makes it easy to get in the back......should have done this 20myrs ago

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...