Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

So I have read every post I can find, and I have seen a few times mentioned that simply placing a borla muffer(xs type) will lead to drone. 

 

What I can’t understand is why that would be. What other modifications or differences does the full borla cat back offer? Assumption of a new muffler and any other mods-resonator flapper etc.

 

believe me, I’ll spend the money on the full system if need be, but I can’t really understand the true difference( between having all stainless).

 

Can anyone explain in any kind of detail as to why it’s worth or not worth spending the extra 1,000??

 

thanks 

Edited by RPaul
Posted

There's a lot of science and R&D that goes into developing a good exhaust system that doesn't drone but still works efficiently.  For example, certain harmonics have to be tuned out throughout the whole RPM range.  I just test drove a '20 RST that someone had taken to a local exhaust shop and had what looked like a flowmaster installed where the muffler went and also had the resonators cut off in the back.  I only had to drive a few blocks to know that truck wasn't for me.  Quite annoying in the cab.  And even worse when cylinders started shutting down.

Posted

Understand and agree with that completely. My question is specifically what differentiates the borla cat back system versus purchasing a borla muffler and cutting out flappers after the muffler.

 

to be even more specific , the borla catback seems to be a muffler and then straight pipe back to tips. Granted (maybe) borla bent them to change some sound but does the way the pipes route to tips change that much?

 

again I’m being open minded, but it’s a pretty legitimate question. 
 

im looking at an image of the cat back system and all I can see is a muffler and then a pipe split straight to tips. What am I missing?

 

Posted
52 minutes ago, RPaul said:

Understand and agree with that completely. My question is specifically what differentiates the borla cat back system versus purchasing a borla muffler and cutting out flappers after the muffler.

 

to be even more specific , the borla catback seems to be a muffler and then straight pipe back to tips. Granted (maybe) borla bent them to change some sound but does the way the pipes route to tips change that much?

 

again I’m being open minded, but it’s a pretty legitimate question. 
 

im looking at an image of the cat back system and all I can see is a muffler and then a pipe split straight to tips. What am I missing?

 

I often wondered this myself.  I swaped my stock muffler out for a straight through vibrant quiet muffler and it had a deep mellow tone, but droned like crazy! Why doesn't the Borla? I even left the factory resonators on my 6.2 in place. Mind you I called Borla and tried to buy just their touring muffler that they sell with their full exhaust. They wouldn't do it. So I found a new in the box GM pp exhaust "which is the same as the Borla touring system" for 700 on marketplace. When I got it I looked in the muffler and although it's a straight through design. It has a hole on the one side of the core. That is where the difference is. Not the tubing design. It's in the muffler and let me tell you it works! 

The only other muffler I thought of trying was this one from Banks.

https://www.bankspower.com/i-955-exhaust-muffler-stainless-steel-3-5-inch-inlet-and-outlet-for-2005-2016-ford-truck-6-8l-6-2l-and-chevy-6-0l-6-2l.html It has an expansion chamber that claims to eliminate drone.

Posted

If they have a muffler that makes the engine deactivation sound like a V-8. I want one for my CRV. 

Posted
3 hours ago, RPaul said:

Thanks for reply, so you installed only the muffler or the entire performance exhaust?

For the GM performance exhaust on my 2020 LT 5.3L (side exit vs dual rear exit) the exhaust tubing is larger than stock (3" vs 2.75"), therefore increasing flow.  Even though the side exit performance exhaust is not made by Borla, I believe the dual rear exit exhaust made by Borla also has the larger diameter tubing as well, so that's a benefit of the entire CAT-back system over just replacing the muffler.

Posted
1 hour ago, Anacortes Army Guy said:

For the GM performance exhaust on my 2020 LT 5.3L (side exit vs dual rear exit) the exhaust tubing is larger than stock (3" vs 2.75"), therefore increasing flow.  Even though the side exit performance exhaust is not made by Borla, I believe the dual rear exit exhaust made by Borla also has the larger diameter tubing as well, so that's a benefit of the entire CAT-back system over just replacing the muffler.

Exactly.  The stock 6.2 exhaust starts at 3.5" and necks down to 3" at the muffler and flapper and then back to 3.5" before it splits into 2 2.5" dual pipes. When I cut the muffler out I replaced it with a 3.5" muffler and bought a length of 3.5" 304ss tubing to eliminate all the 3" tubing.

Posted

I didn't want to do a cat-back system so at first, I put a Flowmaster FlowFx on my truck.  Sounded great most of the time but the drone was terrible.  DFM was really noticeable as well.  I decided to try the Flowmaster Super 50 part#53055.  It sounds perfect now.  Definitely louder than stock but completely tolerable at highway speeds.  No drone.

 

I left my resonators on but had the flapper removed.  Very happy with it now.

 

https://www.summitracing.com/parts/flo-53055?seid=srese1&gclid=CjwKCAjw3_KIBhA2EiwAaAAliuyrX8RlH5bSJ0VvQZe8MqCOCJaZbqF_F7h5F7qdj_sygqHqls_8ABoC3YYQAvD_BwE

Posted

Just replace the muffler with a piece of pipe.  Leave the flapper(s) in place.  I did it on my 5.3l and don't have any drone.  No louder than the Goodyear tires that the Trail Boss come with.

Posted (edited)
On 8/17/2021 at 10:05 PM, Firehawk99 said:

I often wondered this myself.  I swaped my stock muffler out for a straight through vibrant quiet muffler and it had a deep mellow tone, but droned like crazy! Why doesn't the Borla? I even left the factory resonators on my 6.2 in place. Mind you I called Borla and tried to buy just their touring muffler that they sell with their full exhaust. They wouldn't do it. So I found a new in the box GM pp exhaust "which is the same as the Borla touring system" for 700 on marketplace. When I got it I looked in the muffler and although it's a straight through design. It has a hole on the one side of the core. That is where the difference is. Not the tubing design. It's in the muffler and let me tell you it works! 

The only other muffler I thought of trying was this one from Banks.

https://www.bankspower.com/i-955-exhaust-muffler-stainless-steel-3-5-inch-inlet-and-outlet-for-2005-2016-ford-truck-6-8l-6-2l-and-chevy-6-0l-6-2l.html It has an expansion chamber that claims to eliminate drone.

 

same design as corsa. I had 2 borla pro xs in line, still couldn't endure the drone while towing. purchased corsa sport on marketplace and left borla's with muffler shop.

 

 

 

Edited by e.texerado
  • Like 1
Posted

I am sure it is due to the size in the muffler. I had an atak muffler welded in and initially not horrible but after about 500 miles it droned so bad on the 6.2 that it gave my 8 yo car sickness . Went with the Corsa sport and will not look back. No drone AT ALL.  Unfortunately it is in the shop with 4700 and I think it has the dreaded valve issue. Happened on the interstate 600 miles from home, but that's a post for a different forum

Posted
10 hours ago, e.texerado said:

 

same design as corsa. I had 2 borla pro xs in line, still couldn't endure the drone while towing. purchased corsa sport on marketplace and left borla's with muffler shop.

 

 

 

Great video. There's proof you get what you pay for!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 1,506 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • I have 2 choices. 
    • Do you have access to BP fuels? Some stations have Silver 91 E-0 priced the same as their 93 E-10.  There is a local Marathon with 90 alky free for $6 a gallon but I go down the road to BP for $5-ish. They also have a 100 E-0 but that stuff is $10 a pop. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...