Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 11/7/2021 at 8:42 AM, Grumpy Bear said:

 

You do know that there is nothing special about the AFM parts to the 5.3 right? 6.2 and 4.3 use the same system and parts save the 4.3's VLOM casting but the parts on that casting are the same as the others. All have the same oil pumps and related parts as well. As far as the rest of this rant....I have 150,000 on mine with two very minor repairs. A weepy pinion seal I could have let go forever and a warps plastic heat shield around the starter that made noise. CadillacLuke has 200K on his without lifter failure. 

 

Somewhere between 'can't get out of the driveway' and "flawless" the truth is the same for them all. Hardly over a 50% failure rate. Hint: stating a statistic without a verifiable source does not make a statement a fact nor true. 

 

Ya got a lemon. 

Exactly Grumps.

You're only going hear about the failures on here.

 What about the millions of these trucks that haven't had this problem? I'm sure it's like a less than 1% failure rate. 

C'mon man.

 

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

I believe some of it is oil related. OCI's play a big part in it IMO. Yes parts fail. I still think 7500 miles with semi synthetic oil is to long. To long for full synthetic also. The oil just gets dirty and the oil passages suffer. 

Edited by diyer2
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, dzsmith said:

The failure rate is high....man. my bosses truck didnt have a lifter stick until 160k.....Another guy i work had one stick at 120k, my uncle had one stick at 90k and another guy i work with had one also stick at less than 100k.....its pretty common. by the way my uncles was the 6.2...i will admit you dont hear about it as much on other afm engines besides the 5.3 but thats mostly because 99% of gm truck owners i know have the 5.3....and i dont know a single 1500 gm driver with a 4.3 not one.

 

 

Interesting stuff that is. Of all the guys I know there has not been a single failure yet. I know some guys north of 200K on their engines as well. Now the shop I use has done a few and his take on it is that the guys with failures also seem to be the guys who push oil changes and whip on them regularly. 

 

We were tossing something around in an other thread on this topic of failure differences between the 8 and the 6 cylinder motors yesterday I believe. @newdude verified that the parts are the same between them save the VLOM casting itself and after reviewing the TSB that failures are the result of aeration of the oil as a primary cause. There have been a few batches of 'bad' lifters GM has identified and shop experience has uncovered many cases of plugged VLOM pre-screens. That one under the pressure switch that nobody changes. That is a mistake. It's serviceable for a reason. 

 

Best guess....0W20 vs 5W30. and oil system maintenance issues. Still...interesting stuff. 

 

dyier2 wrote: I believe some of it is oil related. OCI's play a big part in it IMO. Yes parts fail. I still think 7500 miles with semi synthetic oil is to long. To long for full synthetic also. The oil just gets dirty and the oil passages suffer. 

Edited 6 minutes ago by diyer2

 

Yep!

Edited by Grumpy Bear
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, dzsmith said:

The failure rate is high....man. my bosses truck didnt have a lifter stick until 160k.....Another guy i work had one stick at 120k, my uncle had one stick at 90k and another guy i work with had one also stick at less than 100k.....its pretty common. by the way my uncles was the 6.2...i will admit you dont hear about it as much on other afm engines besides the 5.3 but thats mostly because 99% of gm truck owners i know have the 5.3....and i dont know a single 1500 gm driver with a 4.3 not one.

 

 

3 people you know, its "common" to you.

 

Been at a GM dealer for 12 years.  Its not as "common" as lead to believe, but yes, they do happen.  Out of all the AFM/DFM trucks we've worked on regularly in 12 years (hundreds to thousands) 99% of them have never been apart for lifter replacement.  Low and high miles.   

 

The internet and social media make it sound like every single truck built has had a lifter go.  Not the case.  

 

Hell, I think in the last 5 years we've had more 6L80s come out of trucks than trucks have come for lifter failure.  

Edited by newdude
  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, newdude said:

Hell, I think in the last 5 years we've had more 6L80s come out of trucks than trucks have come for lifter failure.  

Edited 1 minute ago by newdude

 

Oh man....you just turned this into a 6L80E failure thread!

:rollin:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
On 11/3/2021 at 11:41 AM, KARNUT said:

Not really. I had a Ram V-10 out of warranty fail. They determined it was a defect. It was close to that mileage. I only paid labor. I even used it for pulling a trailer. 

Absolutely.  I did rebuild and warranty oil analysis failure and causal analysis for Chrysler 5.7 hemi's failing and we used Detroit Diesel to reman the replacement engines.  

 

Many were getting engines out of warranty if the oil analysis showed the owner did nothing wrong and the engines rod bearings failed from defect. 

  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, customboss said:

Absolutely.  I did rebuild and warranty oil analysis failure and causal analysis for Chrysler 5.7 hemi's failing and we used Detroit Diesel to reman the replacement engines.  

 

Many were getting engines out of warranty if the oil analysis showed the owner did nothing wrong and the engines rod bearings failed from defect. 

 

I had HONDA replace a motor out of warranty on their dime when they determined that it was entirely a casting issue and nothing anyone had control over post sale. Allot has to do with approach. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

It certainly happens to old as well as new.  My '16 6.2 spit one with 57K on it and my neighbors '21 just did it in August with 8K on it.  I'm starting to think there's more to the lighter oil weight at least contributing to the occurrences.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 11/16/2021 at 9:17 AM, Grumpy Bear said:

 

 

Interesting stuff that is. Of all the guys I know there has not been a single failure yet. I know some guys north of 200K on their engines as well. Now the shop I use has done a few and his take on it is that the guys with failures also seem to be the guys who push oil changes and whip on them regularly. 

 

We were tossing something around in an other thread on this topic of failure differences between the 8 and the 6 cylinder motors yesterday I believe. @newdude verified that the parts are the same between them save the VLOM casting itself and after reviewing the TSB that failures are the result of aeration of the oil as a primary cause. There have been a few batches of 'bad' lifters GM has identified and shop experience has uncovered many cases of plugged VLOM pre-screens. That one under the pressure switch that nobody changes. That is a mistake. It's serviceable for a reason. 

 

Best guess....0W20 vs 5W30. and oil system maintenance issues. Still...interesting stuff. 

 

dyier2 wrote: I believe some of it is oil related. OCI's play a big part in it IMO. Yes parts fail. I still think 7500 miles with semi synthetic oil is to long. To long for full synthetic also. The oil just gets dirty and the oil passages suffer. 

Edited 6 minutes ago by diyer2

 

Yep!

How often should the screens be serviced and how are they serviced?

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, steelerdude15 said:

How often should the screens be serviced and how are they serviced?

 

You have a PM

  • Thanks 1
  • 3 years later...
Posted

Did you ever get this resolved? Have the same issue and GM isn’t doing anything about it They quoted me $9800. Truck doesn’t even have 100k on it. 

Posted
On 4/22/2025 at 2:59 PM, Millercm said:

Did you ever get this resolved? Have the same issue and GM isn’t doing anything about it They quoted me $9800. Truck doesn’t even have 100k on it. 

We know expensive repairs can be extremely upsetting. Although cost assistance is not guaranteed, we are happy to look into your situation and open a case on your behalf. We can be reached via email at [email protected], and we ask that you share your VIN, mileage, and dealership information. By sending us a message, you consent to the information you provide being monitored and recorded by GM or those acting on GM’s behalf, subject to the GM Privacy Statement: https://www.gm.com/privacy-statement.

  • Haha 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

i hadn't heard about the screen being servicable and haven't seen the TSB .  Can someone explain the screen and service and post a link to the TSB? 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Srode1 said:

i hadn't heard about the screen being servicable and haven't seen the TSB .  Can someone explain the screen and service and post a link to the TSB? 

 

 

12623757.  Its above the oil pressure sensor at the front of the VLOM.  Accessed by a plug in the top of the VLOM.    

  • Like 1
Posted
On 5/7/2025 at 12:26 PM, newdude said:

 

 

12623757.  Its above the oil pressure sensor at the front of the VLOM.  Accessed by a plug in the top of the VLOM.    

Thanks, I found some information based on that.  I haven't seen anything on a service interval though, only comments to replace that and the pressure sender when the oil pressure drops which doesn't sound right. Looks like a metal screen, so is it just for aeration reduction or is acting like a filter / getting clogged too? 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,979
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    rayredbone
    Newest Member
    rayredbone
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 461 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Question @diyer2 on this line if you please. Are you saying the shudder is the system turning on and off at the frequency of the shudder? Guess I'm asking if you are saying you have seen it do this with the bi-direction scan tool in graph mode? If so have you been able to discern the 'trigger'. Something is telling to cycle rapidly.    My truck just started doing this recently. 197K on the clock. My response has been M5 anything under 55 mph. I treat it like a lugging stick shift. Gear down and let it spin a bit. Engauge M5, then tow mode and then M6 lets the trans stay in 5th but the AFM is active. Smooth like Skippy.    My thought was that as a machine ages the friction gets lower and as the system is load based, the lower friction would allow it to turn on at ever lower rpm until it reaches the lugging point. And yes I am ignorant of any minimum rpm requirement for the system. If you know that would be useful information.    As you know I run a Scan-Gauge II which allows me to watch the On/Off of the signal to the VLOM. While in the shudder mode I'm not seeing is cycle at that frequency or at all for that matter outside the triggers @newdude posted a few years back. Now is it possible that the refresh rate isn't fast enough to catch it? Maybe. It is why I asked my first question about graphing and trigging parameter.     As we have observed from members here the failure point is all over the map miles wise as you note yourself in your opening post. That by itself begs a few questions like fellows that comment on these lifters failing even after the system has been disabled. Long after. 😬   https://www.enginelabs.com/news/tech-tips-replacing-ls-active-fuel-management-lifters-with-melling/   The Gen5 lifters operate the same as the LS versions. In fact they are the same lifter.    https://www.enginelabs.com/tech-stories/sorting-out-gen-v-lt-lifter-failure-with-a-simple-valvetrain-fix/        
    • UPDATE 2: Steering wheel control backlights and control of the cluster can supposedly be achieved by adding a wire to pin 20 of the cluster and tapping it to pin 2 of the main clock spring harness. I'm going to give it a shot - will update  
    • GM Global A pickups 2019-2022 can do OTA programming for the radio.  GM VIP (GM Global B) can do OTAs for almost every module on board.  So a 2022.5 and newer pickup can do OTAs for recalls like the 2.7 fuel flow recall.  EVs get OTAs that improve one pedal driving, radio issues, HVAC issues, updated battery management software, etc.     So age of the vehicle/what GM electrical platform its on will alter what amount of updates can be pushed on OTAs.  
    • Thank You.   So far my new ride is making me look like a genius for going with the 3.0L, as my first fuel refill occurred over three weeks from when I took delivery.  This engine combination is very amazing.  So far no issues and had not done a regen yet.
    • I am curious as to how much fluid you put back in the transmission ( assuming you had replaced the filter to compare to my findings ) and then went through the process of warming up the trans before pulling the check plug to drain out the excess and if you measured how much came back out.    I just found it surprising that some claimed a certain amount less fluid being put in and then draining some back out. The attitude of the truck as per if the surface is level and how the trucks stance is would make quite a difference since the check plug is right at the front of the transmission. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...