Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Unfortunately it will probably be a while before I have any serious highway miles but I have been doing 30-40 miles each way at least once a week. I just did it again today. About 42⁰ outside and the trans temp stayed in the upper 140⁰ to lower 150⁰. I don't think it even got up to 154⁰. This was running 80-85mph pretty much the whole way. It's not completely flat but has very slight up and down sections all along the way.

 

Like @BlaineBug, I honestly never payed much attention to the trans temps prior to this year so I don't have any data from when ambient temps were colder before. I only started to pay attention after I got my new toyhauler and began dragging it around the Midwest starting in the spring. Before pill flip, temps went pretty high as I had posted about before. After pill flip, temps were still a bit high but stayed more reasonable. With the new 154⁰ trans thermostat, although I haven't pulled my toyhauler yet, the temps do seem to stay much lower and I haven't noticed any real ill effects to trans when it's cooler out and it takes a while to begin warming up. 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, mikeyk101 said:

Unfortunately it will probably be a while before I have any serious highway miles but I have been doing 30-40 miles each way at least once a week. I just did it again today. About 42⁰ outside and the trans temp stayed in the upper 140⁰ to lower 150⁰. I don't think it even got up to 154⁰. This was running 80-85mph pretty much the whole way. It's not completely flat but has very slight up and down sections all along the way.

 

Like @BlaineBug, I honestly never payed much attention to the trans temps prior to this year so I don't have any data from when ambient temps were colder before. I only started to pay attention after I got my new toyhauler and began dragging it around the Midwest starting in the spring. Before pill flip, temps went pretty high as I had posted about before. After pill flip, temps were still a bit high but stayed more reasonable. With the new 154⁰ trans thermostat, although I haven't pulled my toyhauler yet, the temps do seem to stay much lower and I haven't noticed any real ill effects to trans when it's cooler out and it takes a while to begin warming up. 

It's of my opinion (as well as others) that thermostats are intended to ensure a minimum operating temperature range and get you there more quickly, and also to help slow the flow of fluid to ensure proper liquid to air heat transfer through radiators or other coolers.  Most likely you'll still reach the same maximum temperature regardless as once a thermostat is fully opened it doesn't matter anymore.

Having NO thermostat for engine coolant will result in not reaching temperature in the winter and also overheating in the summer due to having too quick of a flow to dissipate heat in a radiator.  A steady temperature will also not be achieved and it will vary depending on engine speed as the water pump changes flow with engine speed.

This is why I'm choosing to add the revised thermostat with a lower temperature rather than eliminate this temperature control all together.

Edited by BlaineBug
  • Like 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, BlaineBug said:

It's of my opinion (as well as others) that thermostats are intended to ensure a minimum operating temperature range and get you there more quickly, and also to help slow the flow of fluid to ensure proper liquid to air heat transfer through radiators or other coolers.  Most likely you'll still reach the same maximum temperature regardless as once a thermostat is fully opened it doesn't matter anymore.

Having NO thermostat for engine coolant will result in not reaching temperature in the winter and also overheating in the summer due to having too quick of a flow to dissipate heat in a radiator.  A steady temperature will also not be achieved and it will vary depending on engine speed as the water pump changes flow with engine speed.

This is why I'm choosing to add the revised thermostat with a lower temperature rather than eliminate this temperature control all together.

 

Where are you getting the idea ANYONE is advocating removing the water thermostat?

You're on the wrong buss.

Get off it. 

 

That is NOT what is being talked about. The TRANSMISSION thermostat is the conversation. Different device, different location, different fluid. 

 

In 2014 GM installed for the FIRST time a thermostat on the 6L80/90E for the ATF. Something that was absent in the 9 years of production of earlier 6L80/90E transmissions and their cousins the 6L45/50 units. It was NOT put there to 'speed up' the warm up. It in point of fact slowed the warm up. It was put there to RAISE the operating temperature the THIN the already thin (6 cSt) fluid for the purpose of lower internal drag and inch out a minimal MPG increase. Has nothing to do with increased reliability. Point of fact it reduces reliability to reach an OEM EPA goal. Which in point of fact it fails at miserably. The remainder of the transmission cooling system remained THE SAME or very close. It has damaged so many transmissions GM has now conceded that FACT with this new lower temperature device. Which in point of fact requires NO recalibration. Still isn't low enough. Removing the 'Pill' and plugging or Flipping the pill or installing another type of device to defeat it does nothing more than return the transmissions fluid temperature the EXACT same state it was for the preceding 9 years of production in that form

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Where are you getting the idea ANYONE is advocating removing the water thermostat?

You're on the wrong buss.

Get off it. 

 

That is NOT what is being talked about. The TRANSMISSION thermostat is the conversation. Different device, different location, different fluid. 

 

In 2014 GM installed for the FIRST time a thermostat on the 6L80/90E for the ATF. Something that was absent in the 9 years of production of earlier 6L80/90E transmissions and their cousins the 6L45/50 units. It was NOT put there to 'speed up' the warm up. It in point of fact slowed the warm up. It was put there to RAISE the operating temperature the THIN the already thin (6 cSt) fluid for the purpose of lower internal drag and inch out a minimal MPG increase. Has nothing to do with increased reliability. Point of fact it reduces reliability to reach an OEM EPA goal. Which in point of fact it fails at miserably. The remainder of the transmission cooling system remained THE SAME or very close. It has damaged so many transmissions GM has now conceded that FACT with this new lower temperature device. Which in point of fact requires NO recalibration. Still isn't low enough. Removing the 'Pill' and plugging or Flipping the pill or installing another type of device to defeat it does nothing more than return the transmissions fluid temperature the EXACT same state it was for the preceding 9 years of production in that form

 

 


Fluid to air heat transfer applies to any fluid be it water/coolant or oil.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, BlaineBug said:


Fluid to air heat transfer applies to any fluid be it water/coolant or oil.

 

 

You read to many cereal boxes.

 

My truck came with a 207 F water stat. It ran 210-215 F.

I installed a 170 F water stat. It runs 173 F

 

I ran the Factory trans stat of 194 F and it ran 215 to 225 F

Flipped the pill and it runs:

Between 110 F and 160 F depending on air temperature and load/speed

 

TransTemp.thumb.png.026abb0e57c15a77d3ae332bdbbbfe88.png

 

FluidDelta.thumb.png.dfe8df3e5708436471b2f139ad45c671.png

 

Three years data collection of multiple data points per degree. 

 

 

If you run pump inlet into pump outlet and bypass the radiator it will burn down no matter what thermostat you put in it or how fast or slow you pump the coolant. If you use the ocean as the radiator it will never reach any temperature higher than the pools temperature BUT if you use a thermostat it will reach the 'cracking temperature' plus a degree or two. What is my point? Peak temperature is set by the rejection rate of the radiator or fin fan exchanger as you seem to be more familiar with and regulated by the thermostat. You could be running that motor in the seventh level of Donte's Hell and not overheat it with an infinite heat sink and a well designed pump. I expect the engineer that sized the pump knew a thing or two about pump size and flow rates. 

 

You read a story in a car rag where someone overheated a motor removing the thermostat. Was this true? Yep. But the motor was NOT being used as designed nor within its designs range.

 

I wore shoes today and the sun came up. 

My shoes have nothing to do with the sunrise.

Correlation is NOT causation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

 

You read to many cereal boxes.

 

My truck came with a 207 F water stat. It ran 210-215 F.

I installed a 170 F water stat. It runs 173 F

 

I ran the Factory trans stat of 194 F and it ran 215 to 225 F

Flipped the pill and it runs:

Between 110 F and 160 F depending on air temperature and load/speed

 

TransTemp.thumb.png.026abb0e57c15a77d3ae332bdbbbfe88.png

 

FluidDelta.thumb.png.dfe8df3e5708436471b2f139ad45c671.png

 

Three years data collection of multiple data points per degree. 

 

 

If you run pump inlet into pump outlet and bypass the radiator it will burn down no matter what thermostat you put in it or how fast or slow you pump the coolant. If you use the ocean as the radiator it will never reach any temperature higher than the pools temperature BUT if you use a thermostat it will reach the 'cracking temperature' plus a degree or two. What is my point? Peak temperature is set by the rejection rate of the radiator or fin fan exchanger as you seem to be more familiar with and regulated by the thermostat. You could be running that motor in the seventh level of Donte's Hell and not overheat it with an infinite heat sink and a well designed pump. I expect the engineer that sized the pump knew a thing or two about pump size and flow rates. 

 

You read a story in a car rag where someone overheated a motor removing the thermostat. Was this true? Yep. But the motor was NOT being used as designed nor within its designs range.

 

I wore shoes today and the sun came up. 

My shoes have nothing to do with the sunrise.

Correlation is NOT causation.

 I don't read fancy car magazines or rags.  Everything that I have learned has come from conversations with real people and my personal experiences as well.

Edited by BlaineBug
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
On 11/29/2021 at 9:55 AM, BlaineBug said:

 I don't read fancy car magazines or rags.  Everything that I have learned has come from conversations with real people and my personal experiences as well.

 

 

Okay :crackup:Well...last time I checked I'm a real people. Pepper is a real truck. Those were real results of real tests in a real world. I really worked in oil/gas and chemical for a real 40 years and son..... I really taught it as well. Heat exchangers are a HUGE part of refining. Exchangers are  one of the real classes use to teach real operators by real teachers who were trained by the API of whom I'm one.  Is that REAL enough for ya? 

 

There's nothing wrong with your basic premise. It's your conclusions..... You have a perfectly packed parachute you are not pulling the cord. 

 

 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 11/27/2021 at 6:11 PM, BlaineBug said:

20211127_170119.jpg

20211127_170140.jpg

 

This is what my 2022 6L90E stat looks like on my 11/21 built 2500 HD. The 70 stamp and all.

 

I saw somewhere back that the HDs didn't used to have a stat.

 

Guess what...

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Epsilon Plus said:

 

This is what my 2022 6L90E stat looks like on my 11/21 built 2500 HD. The 70 stamp and all.

 

I saw somewhere back that the HDs didn't used to have a stat.

 

Guess what...

Good info!

Posted

I’m trying to understand something that keeps being said. 
 

 

I’ve seen it posted more than once on this thread that no ‘stat can cause over heating due to not keeping the fluid in the cooler long enough.  How would a ‘stat help an engine that is too hot?  Once it hits the opening temp, it can’t slow down the water by closing because the heat already hs it wide open.  

Posted (edited)
On 12/1/2021 at 3:46 PM, Epsilon Plus said:

 

This is what my 2022 6L90E stat looks like on my 11/21 built 2500 HD. The 70 stamp and all.

 

I saw somewhere back that the HDs didn't used to have a stat.

 

Guess what...

Apparently, GM figured out the cooler stat worked and added it to your new truck, just as they did to other year trucks.  I’m sure the heavier loads expected with a 2500 kept them from doing it previously. 
 

Wish I had known about this trans trick prior to replacing my trans at 119,000 miles for $5000.  Now I’m at 218,000 and hope it’s not too late to flip it or add the bypass pill. My truck trans runs at 195 at 55 or 95 mph.  

Edited by 2015 High Miler
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, 2015 High Miler said:

I’m trying to understand something that keeps being said. 
 

 

I’ve seen it posted more than once on this thread that no ‘stat can cause over heating due to not keeping the fluid in the cooler long enough.  How would a ‘stat help an engine that is too hot?  Once it hits the opening temp, it can’t slow down the water by closing because the heat already hs it wide open.  

The coolant can flow too fast and not have enough time to transfer and dissipate the heat to the metallic radiator.  In the automotive world especially with older vehicles, removing a thermostat was considered poor for this very reason.  I've also seen flow restrictors sold that one could essentially replace a thermostat with, which is essentially a big washer of the same diameter of the original thermostat, but with a hole of some diameter drilled in the center which still allows flow, but not full flow as if no thermostat and no flow restrictor were installed otherwise.

Read here if you wish;  http://gojeep.willyshotrod.com/HowtoRadiatorRestrictor.htm

Edited by BlaineBug
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, 2015 High Miler said:

Apparently, GM figured out the cooler stat worked and added it to your new truck, just as they did to other year trucks.  I’m sure the heavier loads expected with a 2500 kept them from doing it previously. 
 

Wish I had known about this trans trick prior to replacing my trans at 119,000 miles for $5000.  Now I’m at 218,000 and hope it’s not too late to flip it or add the bypass pill. My truck trans runs at 195 at 55 or 95 mph.  

Changing your fluid regularly every ~50,000 miles will net you the biggest advantage for longevity as more frequent maintenance is always key, and neglect normally results in premature failures whatever the "item" may be.  And you can swap in the lower temperature "revised" thermostat if you'd like as well.

Edited by BlaineBug
Posted

With 4-5k logged miles since the pill-flip, mark me down for another that saw not only cooler overall temperatures, but quicker warm up, as well.

 

I run an external ATF cooler on my 442 which completely bypasses the radiator's heat exchanger (so no liquid-liquid heat transfer), and that "weak" 2004-r has survived at least 140k miles of abuse behind a series of engines larger and stronger than the stock motor.  Still shifts better than any 6L-90, too.  🙂

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, 16LT4 said:

With 4-5k logged miles since the pill-flip, mark me down for another that saw not only cooler overall temperatures, but quicker warm up, as well.

 

I run an external ATF cooler on my 442 which completely bypasses the radiator's heat exchanger (so no liquid-liquid heat transfer), and that "weak" 2004-r has survived at least 140k miles of abuse behind a series of engines larger and stronger than the stock motor.  Still shifts better than any 6L-90, too.  🙂

I haven't had a chance to install my lower temperature "revised" transmission thermostat yet, however I can't see how you'd experience both lower operating temperature and faster warm up simultaneously.  Your trans fluid is being exposed to the same ~210 degree engine coolant either way.

Regardless, someone above asked if I could detail what my operating temps are with the old style thermostat.  I just returned from a 90-120 minute trip in city traffic non-highway.  When returning home the cluster read the transmission temperature at 189 degrees.  Engine coolant temp reading centered at approximately ~210 degrees.  The outdoor ambient temperature is currently at 51 degrees.

Edited by BlaineBug

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...