Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
16 hours ago, 2016 Sierra Owner said:

I understand that. The road was changed 1 year BEFORE I bought my truck. Yet the NAV in my truck still shows the old road. I don't have to pay for my phone maps.

 

Well that's assuming when you purchased it the most up to date apps were installed. For commercial apps a year lag is about right. The phone apps (google/waze & apple) all run their own maps so they can be updated much more frequently, but for someone like GM they need to go to a map provider to get their map updates and then they may have to do testing on hardware to make sure they don't brick someones vehicle infotainment system.

 

But I'm with you, built in NAV is outdated for many reasons, your pocket supercomputer contains much more robust programs. I'm also guessing this is why they came out with Maps+ to stay way more up to date. I don't pay for that subscription so I can't tell if its good or not.

Posted
3 minutes ago, fastk9dad said:

 

Well that's assuming when you purchased it the most up to date apps were installed. For commercial apps a year lag is about right. The phone apps (google/waze & apple) all run their own maps so they can be updated much more frequently, but for someone like GM they need to go to a map provider to get their map updates and then they may have to do testing on hardware to make sure they don't brick someones vehicle infotainment system.

 

But I'm with you, built in NAV is outdated for many reasons, your pocket supercomputer contains much more robust programs. I'm also guessing this is why they came out with Maps+ to stay way more up to date. I don't pay for that subscription so I can't tell if its good or not.

Maps+ need a lot of updating to be up to date.  There a lot of addresses it couldn't find when I tried using it. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

I've noticed on Maps+ that it routes weird sometimes. It has wanted me to get off the freeway and go around in spots when Waze shows staying on the freeway and no issues. I thought it would be convenient to have it on the radio without having to plug my phone in but I find myself using Waze almost exclusively for navigation now. Maps+ def needs some updating and refinement still.

Posted

Routing can change depending on settings selected.

 

Shortest vs fastest can sometimes make unexpected changes. 

Avoidances/preferences can too.

Doesn't matter what gps / mapping source is in use. 

 

Of course no setting fixes  map that doesn't yet show a new road.

Sometimes they don't add them til they are 'assumed' by the municipality.

 

Posted
8 hours ago, redwngr said:

Routing can change depending on settings selected.

 

Shortest vs fastest can sometimes make unexpected changes. 

Avoidances/preferences can too.

Doesn't matter what gps / mapping source is in use. 

 

Of course no setting fixes  map that doesn't yet show a new road.

Sometimes they don't add them til they are 'assumed' by the municipality.

 

Again, my road has existed for over 50 years.  Still not on GM factory navigation.  It is in Maps+, though. 

Posted

And I've found roads that aren't in google maps.

It happens.

 

Of course if you do googles job for them and let them know, then they will add them.

Posted
5 minutes ago, redwngr said:

And I've found roads that aren't in google maps.

It happens.

 

Of course if you do googles job for them and let them know, then they will add them.

Back in the early garmin days while looking for ways around for my ROW tractor. The navigation device would put me on roads turning to dirt. Eventually leading to a locked gate. Lucky for me I was driving a 4WD. Otherwise there I would have sat sinking to the axle in sand. Some roads in Texas are named private roads that the garman didn’t inform. 

Posted
19 hours ago, redwngr said:

And I've found roads that aren't in google maps.

It happens.

 

Of course if you do googles job for them and let them know, then they will add them.

Been there, done that.  The address for the house I owned in Virginia was wrong on Google Maps.  Everybody was turning left when they should've been turning right.  It didn't change much after telling Google because most everybody is using other GPS devices. 

Posted
19 hours ago, KARNUT said:

Back in the early garmin days while looking for ways around for my ROW tractor. The navigation device would put me on roads turning to dirt. Eventually leading to a locked gate. Lucky for me I was driving a 4WD. Otherwise there I would have sat sinking to the axle in sand. Some roads in Texas are named private roads that the garman didn’t inform. 

Same thing happens in Wyoming.  Went to see the eclipse in 2017.  Traffics was backed up 36 miles, which took over 3 hours to get through.  Google tried having me turn off the paved road onto fenced dirt roads.  I didn't want to risk my wife's Traverse, so I waited out the traffic.  We had the fuel, and kids were distracted with their devices and toys.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
On 1/3/2022 at 5:28 PM, fastk9dad said:

 

If you are using the built in NAV with the SD card you would need to get an updated maps SD card if you want them to update. https://gmnavdisc.navigation.com/home/en_US/GMNA/USD

 

Do you know if this can be used on a truck without maps? It says update. I have an SD card slow and a maps button, but my truck didn't come with the SD card.

 

Here's what my build sheet says:

Quote

IOS - CHEVROLET INFOTAINMENT 3 PLUS 8" DIAG
HD COLOR TOUCHSCREEN VOICE RECOGNITION
BLUETOOTH AUDIO STREAMING APPLE CARPLAY& ANDROID AUTO CAPABLE, IN-VEHICLE APPS
AND PERSONALIZATION CAPABLE

 

Edited by nichos
Posted
2 hours ago, nichos said:

 

Do you know if this can be used on a truck without maps? It says update. I have an SD card slow and a maps button, but my truck didn't come with the SD card.

 

Here's what my build sheet says:

 

I believe the short answer is no.  The SD card reader for navigation only works on trucks with factory navigation.  However, you can use the Maps+ (I think I have that right) app, coupled with the appropriate Onstar subscription plan for navigation that is voice turn-by-turn navigation, and I believe visual turn-by-turn directions are displayed on the DIC (no map on the infotainment screen though).  A couple of aftermarket vendors do, however, offer options for upgrading to factory navigation if you have the IOS infotainment system and the SD card reader.  White Automotive and Media Services is one, and OBD Genie is another.  I went with the OBD Genie and am happy with the results on my 2020 Silverado LT.

Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, Anacortes Army Guy said:

I believe the short answer is no.  The SD card reader for navigation only works on trucks with factory navigation.  However, you can use the Maps+ (I think I have that right) app, coupled with the appropriate Onstar subscription plan for navigation that is voice turn-by-turn navigation, and I believe visual turn-by-turn directions are displayed on the DIC (no map on the infotainment screen though).  A couple of aftermarket vendors do, however, offer options for upgrading to factory navigation if you have the IOS infotainment system and the SD card reader.  White Automotive and Media Services is one, and OBD Genie is another.  I went with the OBD Genie and am happy with the results on my 2020 Silverado LT.

You have it correct.  Nothing to add.  I did the GM factory nav upgrade through MVI.  Very happy with the result. 

Edited by Transient

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,902
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Newest Member
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 273 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • With large equipment or deep mud it is more of a use the higher gear to avoid spinning tires, getting stuck because of spinning tires and doing damage to your machine. The idea is if you run out of torque before you spin tires you can still downshift for more torque. If you are just spinning your tires in the lowest available gear you are stuck and things break.   Automatic transmissions, traction control and electronic transfer cases change the calculation a little as you the driver have less control over each piece. 
    • are there any codes? with lots of rust, perhaps disconnect/clean both sides of the connection/examine cable ends (the wires) for corrosion going into the sheath & replace if necessary/reconnect ALL the power AND ground cables between the battery, engine, frame, cab, fuse box and starter charm.li (website) has a no-start diagnostic procedure you can work through to get it working.
    • Its no wonder you've gravitated to the oil types and brands you have in later years after trying certain brands and one being a specialty oil or at least very hard to come by up here and the other would have been a commonly found oil of the era and the vastly different outcomes as a result to using the vehicles in question the same distance for an OCI . It shows what marketing hype can do without actually having the product to back up the claims and that is no different now with the insane claims that are written on the side of a bottle of oil from some of the off the shelf oils.    What has surprised me and I was already finding this out before I bought my truck with the GDI engine, that this newer fancy technology that seemingly would suggest better fuel economy/emissions with this high pressure spray of fuel is not in reality kind at all to the engine or at least the oils life. Yet they insist on claiming long OCI with this technology just like they did with the port or similar type fuel injection systems when in reality its a step back in oil life to have a GDI system.    I think the mistake your making Grumpy is that your not sending your samples to Blackstone and getting the feel good glowing report that you can run it another 1000 or more miles and then send another sample where they say run it yet another 1000 miles and on and on it goes until your sending in something that looks a lot like road tar and then they may suggest you change your oil within the next 1000 miles 😆
    • I am guessing that engines of that design back then had a better ability to be abused and survive longer than a new design engine with the long timing chain and the overhead cams and phasers etc. But I would never guess that an engine could go that far and not fail spectacularly or at least die a slow death. 
    • In the 80's 90's I'd run Honda's 7,500 miles between changes using Red Line HP 5W20 and do it for hundreds of thousands of miles with issues. Back in the day it was an SAE 20 with the HTHS of a SAE 30 and SN add load. It was also very polar. Oxidation VOA was over 120. Besides those motors were SPFI and lean burn tech. I could have likely run it longer but never did.    We had a Toyota bought new I ran on Pennzoil's latest and greatest synthetic of the day with "Penthane". A made up word for a very low dose of PAO. Tried 7,500 mile OCI's in that Group III/VI chemistry and the rings tapped out at 90K. Rocker box wasn't as bad as the one Punch put up but it wasn't good either. Also a SPFI motor.    I'm around 3,750 across the board on these GDI monsters and the oil it tapped out by then usually on TBN/TAN crossover and color. Red Line HP Euro.    The AMSOIL SS brochures tell you to follow the OEM values for the service class but that it can be run up to 25K if monitored. I can't imagine what motor could go that distance and not tap out. I've never owned one.    Yes, I know. Lot's of people do. I'm just not going to be one of them. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...