Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Thought I’d throw this out there for anyone looking for cat back alternatives and not wanting to spend $600 or more for a name brand stainless system. Sure you can just do a muffler swap or delete for much cheaper. My only issue with that is the factory pipe size on the 5.3s is 2.75” diameter so you’ll either have to use reducers or have someone weld it in place with a 3” or 2.5” muffler. 

 

I’m running a 3” Dynomax intermediate pipe and tailpipe. These are both direct fit on the 2014-2018 crew cab shortbed trucks and will use all factory exhaust hangers. Not sure on the double cab or standard bed. I’m currently running a Borla extension pipe, 19” Borla ProXs muffler, and an old Corsa pro series tip. The system is all clamped so I’m able to swap mufflers if I get tired of one and want to try something else. You may need to cut the extension pipe depending on the muffler length you decide to run just know you should have roughly a 30”-32” spread between the intermediate pipe and tailpipe. I have Texas Speed longtubes and catted Y pipe but this should bolt up to the factory y pipe. 

 

With all of this including clamps and depending on your choice of muffler and tip, you should have less then $400 in a full stainless catback. 

 

The Dynomax pipes are both 409 stainless steel and run around $100 each. Here are the part numbers

 

Dynomax intermediate pipe (pn 55608)

Dynomax tailpipe (pn 54704)

Borla 3” Ext pipe 304 stainless

choose one ($50-$65 each)

 (Part number includes 1 clamp)

 (pn 60564) 21” length

 (pn 60556) 15” length

 (pn 60554) 11” length

 

You’ll need to order 3 clamps if you decide not to have it welded. Hope this helps someone out. 

28299D1F-B23F-4102-BD39-923C0BC3F5EE.jpeg

C44EFBC4-22B8-4AAB-A552-12F6991DFC6B.jpeg

40927BCC-61CA-46D0-9CD2-88E540B9D56D.jpeg

E0B7E3BC-10AA-4E71-9D0F-C48F4CD5C49C.jpeg

D718285A-A034-4B80-BDCE-75922ACC42D8.jpeg

DE5B0EC2-6C4A-4BA5-BDD9-5713D276A95D.jpeg

98AAD6AD-D0D3-4D9F-8A3C-EFBB92C2827D.jpeg

9CEE7AFF-83F2-4A72-9D90-1B3167077FD2.jpeg

Edited by langston1726
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

Still expensive, not only in money but in time/labor 😉 .  I just installed a complete Proven Ground 3" 409 stainless cat-back system with flow-through muffler and 304 stainless tip.  The system bolted in without issue, didn't require any trimming/measuring/cutting/frustration, and included all stainless band-style clamps instead of u-bolt clamps.  Price?  $364, SHIPPED.

Edited by 16LT4
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Thanks for posting this.  It gives options for those that like to tinker on their truck and enjoy doing it. 

Edited by Black02Silverado
  • Like 1
Posted

I have the full dynomax catback on mine, runs a similar cost but obviously doesn't sound like yours.

 

Also the 409 stainless is cheap stainless, it surface rusts very easy and for sure anywhere with salt. I painted my exhaust with header paint prior to install.

  • Like 1
Posted
16 hours ago, CamGTP said:

Also the 409 stainless is cheap stainless, it surface rusts very easy and for sure anywhere with salt.

 

For sure, but still better than aluminized steel.  I don't know what the stock pipes were, but my intermediate pipe was very flaky, pitted and crusty, so if it was "Stainless", it was labeled by a marketer and not a metallurgist.  My cats, y pipe, muffler and exhaust pipe were in far better condition than the intermediate pipe.  

 

My winter-beater X3 is a 2008 with 186k miles and its entire exhaust system is pristine; it has a ground strap attached from the end of the intermediate pipe to the chassis to ground out stray voltage, so that may be part of the reason.  When I get around to it, I plan to ground my exhaust aft of the muffler somewhere to the chassis as additional rust-preventer.

Posted (edited)

So far, I’ve only seen some surface rust on the hangers of these after a few years. I am in Oklahoma so the roads aren’t covered in salt for months like further north. 

Edited by langston1726
Posted
On 1/19/2022 at 10:58 AM, 16LT4 said:

Still expensive, not only in money but in time/labor 😉 .  I just installed a complete Proven Ground 3" 409 stainless cat-back system with flow-through muffler and 304 stainless tip.  The system bolted in without issue, didn't require any trimming/measuring/cutting/frustration, and included all stainless band-style clamps instead of u-bolt clamps.  Price?  $364, SHIPPED.

Just looked into the Proven Ground kit you mentioned. It looks pretty good for the price. Do you think it would fit a regular cab short bed? Maybe just trimming the intermediate pipe?

Posted
6 minutes ago, LowRado17 said:

Just looked into the Proven Ground kit you mentioned. It looks pretty good for the price. Do you think it would fit a regular cab short bed? Maybe just trimming the intermediate pipe?

 

The kid came with another shorter intermediate pipe; between the 2 pipes (trimming the longer one may be required depending on model), all combinations of 1500 K2s are covered.  Of course, reach out to the seller/company to verify.  It fit my CCSB with no modifications necessary.

 

I love the sound, better throttle response and "cleaner" shift logic the transmission first started exhibiting once I installed the air raid jr.  It's too soon to tell for sure, but the last 50 miles, my fuel economy has gone up by 25% as well (I filled up after installing the system).

Posted

Nice work, that's perfect for someone trying to figure out which muffler to go with. Can you get these in 304ss? As stated above salt/chemicals will hit 409 hard. I'm in the salt belt and 304ss gets surface rust; the lighter the gauge the worse it get's for some reason. 

 

For what exhaust companies charge for their 304 kits you should be getting 316. Major rip off imo.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • probably won't get a response from that user, as they haven't returned to the site since making that one post.  users don't (at least I don't, and I haven't seen any setting which would notify me via say, email) get any notification other than going to this site, and checking if they got a response on their thread...
    • Thanks - I wasn't quite caffeinated this morning. 2:1 makes sense, turning the crankshaft 360 degrees will turn the cam 180 degrees, and had I done that, the cam's dot would be at 6 and the crank's at 12 again.   I went ahead and took the sprocket off anyway, aligned everything dot-to-dot including the balance shaft just for s&g. I'm glad I did because I discovered no Loctite on the timing sprocket bolts. Maybe it's not required, but at only 20 ft-lb torque spec, those bolts aren't in there very tight. Cleaned and reassembled with some thread locker and torqued.   A general observation: Less is more with RTV. If a little doesn't stop a leak, a LOT probably won't, either. RTV is thinly veiled revenge, in a tube...      
    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...