Jump to content

Trans repair before there's an issue

Dieselcamino

By Dieselcamino
in Engines & Drivetrain

 Share

Recommended Posts

Dieselcamino Enthusiast

Dieselcamino

Posted
Posted

Hey everyone, I apologize in advance because I know many are sick of the subject.

 But my 2018 1500 5.3 (30k miles) has been good to me so far! I would like to keep it that way and hearing the torque converter horror stories has me thinking proactively.

 Would having a trans shop swap out the stock converter for an aftermarket solve the majority of the issues? 

 I've also read that the truck should be reprogrammed for the new converter, is this something a standard transmission shop should be able to do in house?

 Lastly is there anything else that should be upgraded while it's out? I've read that the thermostat should be upgraded.

 Thanks in advance guys 

 

  • Like 1
  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

JimCost2014
JimCost2014

This, it is done on quite a few GM models. MC-10163890-9999.pdf

Black02Silverado
Black02Silverado

I wouldn't got that far but I would have the fluid changed out 100%.  Not just a pan drop but have it fully exchanged. You are at the right mileage for that.    Also using a quality syntheti

Dieselcamino
Dieselcamino

Hey everyone, I apologize in advance because I know many are sick of the subject.  But my 2018 1500 5.3 (30k miles) has been good to me so far! I would like to keep it that way and hearing the to

Black02Silverado Senior Enthusiast

Black02Silverado

Posted
Posted

I wouldn't got that far but I would have the fluid changed out 100%.  Not just a pan drop but have it fully exchanged. You are at the right mileage for that. 

 

Also using a quality synthetic like AMSOIL's ATL  transmission fluid would be a step up from the factory fluid.  If interested let me know, I can quote you delivered to your door.

  • Like 2
diyer2 Senior Enthusiast

diyer2

Posted
Posted

Agree with Silverado, change the fluid. Use a fluid your happy with, the Amsoil will be an upgrade IMO. 

  • Like 1
pokismoki Senior Enthusiast

pokismoki

Posted
Posted (edited)

the stock converterter is fine,  reliability improves with removing heat from the trans, target temp should be 140-160 F.  all silverados pre-2014 never had thermostats in the transmission for a reason

 

minimize wear on the tcc in the converter by having tuner disable the lock up for 1,2,3 and 4th gear...

 

change trans fluid at 15k miles with a flush,  and now is the time to change the filter..

 

I would recommend installing a Aux trans filter to capture all metal in the system, the stock filter doesnt remove fine metal, which causes wear on parts..

Edited by pokismoki
newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Dieselcamino said:

Hey everyone, I apologize in advance because I know many are sick of the subject.

 But my 2018 1500 5.3 (30k miles) has been good to me so far! I would like to keep it that way and hearing the torque converter horror stories has me thinking proactively.

 Would having a trans shop swap out the stock converter for an aftermarket solve the majority of the issues? 

 I've also read that the truck should be reprogrammed for the new converter, is this something a standard transmission shop should be able to do in house?

 Lastly is there anything else that should be upgraded while it's out? I've read that the thermostat should be upgraded.

 Thanks in advance guys 

 

 

 

I wouldn't jump on a converter so quickly.

 

I would get either the new lower temp trans thermostat from GM, or the SureCool thermostat delete kit, and then do a full fluid change.  

JimCost2014 Senior Enthusiast

JimCost2014

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Dieselcamino said:

Hey everyone, I apologize in advance because I know many are sick of the subject.

 But my 2018 1500 5.3 (30k miles) has been good to me so far! I would like to keep it that way and hearing the torque converter horror stories has me thinking proactively.

 Would having a trans shop swap out the stock converter for an aftermarket solve the majority of the issues? 

 I've also read that the truck should be reprogrammed for the new converter, is this something a standard transmission shop should be able to do in house?

 Lastly is there anything else that should be upgraded while it's out? I've read that the thermostat should be upgraded.

 Thanks in advance guys 

 

Stole this from another member, and post. Gives you something to think about on the service performed. 

 

A couple of points from a shop owner:  

 

Fluid exchange is the correct procedure, and since it was a warranty job that's what GM is paying for, no more.  Assuming the dealer used a modern exchange machine it is better than dropping the pan.  You simply connect inline to the trans cooler and do a 1:1 exchange of fluid, using the transmission to pump the fluid through all gears.  It gets ALL of the old fluid out of the unit.  Whereas dropping the pan and replacing a filter only replaces what is in the pan or about 40%-50% new fluid.

 

"Flushes" are a thing of the past. The "flush" terminology earned a bad rap because the older "hot flush" equipment used machine pressure to blast fluid (and sometimes solvent cleaners) back through the trans, which could cause issues. 

 

Another benefit of the exchange is time.  It books about 1.0 hours, where a pan drop can book for about 2.0 hours or more.  On a pan drop getting the fluid level perfect is a bit of a process (warm-up time, computer temp verify, racking a second time for level check etc).  It can be a real PITA on other makes with insane procedures.  With the exchange machine it's 1:1 in and out, none of that is required.   Since labor time equals cost the price to you is much cheaper for the exchange.  If you request a pan drop/filter you're going to be paying $labor x 2.0hrs+ and fluid and filter vs $labor x 1.0 plus fluid only (or a fixed menu price in many cases). 

 

Also modern transmission filters are more of a screen and while they can benefit from service at higher mileage they are not the same as paper element filters we grew up servicing.

 

 

  • Like 1
Dieselcamino Enthusiast

Dieselcamino

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Seems like more yays than nays on doing a fluid exchange so I think I will go that route (most likely with amsoil), also going to look into the thermostat delete and external filter.  Bought the truck a year ago with 18k and it gets babied, good info guys thanks.

  • Like 1
Dieselcamino Enthusiast

Dieselcamino

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Just ordered a sureflow bypass, in the past I always dropped the pan and swapped the filter/added fluid.  Maybe it's a stupid question but everyone suggesting bringing it to a shop with a fluid exchanger, wouldn't I need to drop the pan anyway to swap the filter?

14burrito Enthusiast

14burrito

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Dieselcamino said:

Just ordered a sureflow bypass, in the past I always dropped the pan and swapped the filter/added fluid.  Maybe it's a stupid question but everyone suggesting bringing it to a shop with a fluid exchanger, wouldn't I need to drop the pan anyway to swap the filter?

 

Curious what made you choose the sureflow vs the new 70C or pill flip options?

Dieselcamino Enthusiast

Dieselcamino

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Not sure if my last post went through or not, but I chose the sureflow over the "pill flip" from some internet opinions on bypass flow of the trans cooler. I figure 45$ is cheap insurance.  Only avoided the GM 70c thermostat since if they messed it up the first time why pay them to correct their own mistake.

  • Thanks 1
Black02Silverado Senior Enthusiast

Black02Silverado

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Dieselcamino said:

Just ordered a sureflow bypass, in the past I always dropped the pan and swapped the filter/added fluid.  Maybe it's a stupid question but everyone suggesting bringing it to a shop with a fluid exchanger, wouldn't I need to drop the pan anyway to swap the filter?

No need to do the filter.  Just change out all the fluid.  You can do the filter at 100k. 

  • Thanks 1
Dieselcamino Enthusiast

Dieselcamino

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I'm new to these transmissions (last truck was a 97 powerstroke) but from a few things I have read some have claimed the magnet in the pan was full of shavings at 35k miles.  

 Maybe I'm overthinking it but I'm weighing the pros/cons of a fluid exchange vs. pan drop filter change and add fluid.

pokismoki Senior Enthusiast

pokismoki

Posted
Posted

if you got metal on the magnet at 30k miles your probably due for a torque converter  if not a pump...  pulled my pan at 35k and it was clean enough to eat on, no metal anywhere on the mag

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...