Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Steeledude's report

 

 

 

oilcrop.jpg

Edited by txab
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Posted

Something I want to add. I know in the report it explained about getting oil mid-stream which is what I did. I marked on the paper I did too so I'm not sure why they spoke about it in the summary.

Posted (edited)
20 hours ago, customboss said:

steelerdude15 can you make that visible without having to download? 

 

1 hour ago, steelerdude15 said:

Something I want to add. I know in the report it explained about getting oil mid-stream which is what I did. I marked on the paper I did too so I'm not sure why they spoke about it in the summary.

Maybe because you didn't specify about longer change intervals. Also you only have about 3k on the oil. Also you did specify that you pulled the sample that way so they followed up on that. That procedure is normal unless you pulled the sample by other means like dumping it out of your oil filter. 0w20 is a synthetic as well. I doubt they had that much to say. It wasn't an extended drain interval and they didn't find anything out of the ordinary.

Edited by Leo Opalewski
  • Like 1
Posted

Both Leo’s and Steelers results have one thing Bklabs does well. Insolubles. 
In a modern ecotec 5.3 in 3000 miles 0.2 is terrible. 
Leo’s has the Amsoil bypass and full flow and has same insolubles level. Any detectable insolubles IN TODAYS engines is not acceptable.  Especially if you can filter them out or run a short interval. Suggests both aren’t tuned well or ideally. 

Posted

Oil analysts is probably good for peace of mind. And does provide good conversation. It’s been made as evidence that if you pay attention you do get warnings when your ride isn’t happy. Vehicles have been rehabilitated by flushing different oils and increasing OCIs. Turning around potential failures and restoring longevity. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
6 hours ago, customboss said:

Both Leo’s and Steelers results have one thing Bklabs does well. Insolubles. 
In a modern ecotec 5.3 in 3000 miles 0.2 is terrible. 
Leo’s has the Amsoil bypass and full flow and has same insolubles level. Any detectable insolubles IN TODAYS engines is not acceptable.  Especially if you can filter them out or run a short interval. Suggests both aren’t tuned well or ideally. 

I run the engine hard which is no excuse. They labeled the engine as an ecotec but it's a Gen 4 5.3l with 190k+ on the clock. I haven't had issues with the tune and my fuels trims are running within the 3% +/- mark. With a 10k OCI I don't think 0.2 insolubles is bad.

  • Like 1
Posted

Also what's probably causing the insolubles is before I change my oil I perform a intake plenum and valve cleaning service via the dirty air pcv entrance on top of the intake plenum. 1 whole bottle of BG platinum air intake, valve and combustion chamber cleaner. Maybe that's the cause from carbon getting past the piston rings?

  • Like 2
Posted
24 minutes ago, Leo Opalewski said:

Also what's probably causing the insolubles is before I change my oil I perform a intake plenum and valve cleaning service via the dirty air pcv entrance on top of the intake plenum. 1 whole bottle of BG platinum air intake, valve and combustion chamber cleaner. Maybe that's the cause from carbon getting past the piston rings?

Maybe Leo,  but the filters set up you have you should see a lower insolubles unless its fuel related. After 45 years of oil analysis work at a OEM R&D level I am saying  that the pentane insolubles 0.2% levels is high.  Bklabs analysts don't have that level of testing experience of engines, fuels, lubes, including emission calibrations of modern engines.  

Posted
40 minutes ago, customboss said:

Maybe Leo,  but the filters set up you have you should see a lower insolubles unless its fuel related. After 45 years of oil analysis work at a OEM R&D level I am saying  that the pentane insolubles 0.2% levels is high.  Bklabs analysts don't have that level of testing experience of engines, fuels, lubes, including emission calibrations of modern engines.  

Well hopefully my next sample will change. I'll skip the cleaner and try a sample then. Won't be till next year unless I magically win the lottery to afford a cam swap. 🤣

  • Haha 1
Posted

07512333-BB63-4630-8D8D-E1F5D38448D1.thumb.jpeg.567199af8626d626f26b9934b9af4b9b.jpeg2AD19F72-D297-4C94-8D54-7BC60FA4EB4A.thumb.jpeg.9bb33fee38662ba3edf88977cfcdf01b.jpeg
This Pennzoil 0w40 stinks BTW. At least in this application. No wonder it was so cheap!

  • Sad 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, OnTheReel said:

07512333-BB63-4630-8D8D-E1F5D38448D1.thumb.jpeg.567199af8626d626f26b9934b9af4b9b.jpeg2AD19F72-D297-4C94-8D54-7BC60FA4EB4A.thumb.jpeg.9bb33fee38662ba3edf88977cfcdf01b.jpeg
This Pennzoil 0w40 stinks BTW. At least in this application. No wonder it was so cheap!

Same thing with that oil analysis. Thats a generic industrial lab analysis. Not a good ISO Certified automotive one from @Black02Silverado. Get what ya pay for.  TESTOIL cannot compete with Nicks work by design.  12,000 miles and that wear is still terrible. 

 

 

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Get the 5.3. I`m not a Ford guy.😉   I think these L84`s are less problematic than the L83`s. Certainly less than the L87.
    • I have finally paid off my mortgage and can now purchase a new truck. I would greatly appreciate any opinions on the purchase of a new 2026 GMC Denali 5.3L or 6.2L with the Denali reserve package. I am not interested in the 3.0L.  Or should I go buy a Ford?   Thank, John
    • One of the few things I enjoyed about my time in the midwest was taking off on weekend drives. Unlike home, where we are boxed in by mountains and water, those rules don't apply to the inland plains. Roads connect and sprawl everywhere. While Minnesota is flat, it's not completely featureless and there are fast moving rural roads with curves and slight elevation changes. I used to relish heading out in a particular direction with no set destination, no curfew, and weaving through little townships, wherever the roads would take me. Along farms, lakes, or through the deciduous trees... It was beautiful in its own way, and the seasons were so distinct there. Fall drives yielded amazing shows of color and contrast. Summer drives rewarded with the and amber evening glow of the prairie (and lots of juicy bugs).    I do a lot of that here in my home state too. But it's much less mysterious/intriguing. I've traveled most roads in the region, and every road that's fun to drive within a good radius of my house. But every drive, even on the same old roads, is still enjoyable. I know where I can lean hard into the throttle or really throw the car into a curve. There are exercise loops for when I just need to keep certain cars limber, and much longer routes to settle in and enjoy a drive and put some miles on. All the mountains and water make for some really awesome roads for spirited driving. But not all my driving is spirited, for example, that's not really enjoyable in my pickup or this Blazer (that's still here...).   Sometimes a good drive is followed by a ritualistic wash before tucking the car away...
    • 'GMAuthority' is reporting the 2027 HD's will have the L8S 6.6L gasoline V-8.  There was some talk here about the L8S awhile back.  Not sure what changes it will have now as it seems the 2027 emissions regulations have changed from what was originally proposed.  The big question will be is L8S just a stopgap for the last 2 years of the current T1 HD platform or will it carry forward to the next generation 2029 T1-2 HD's?    I assume the L8S will still be a Gen. V engine. 
    • New engines will still be using DEF. You just won't have the limp modes occurring when you run out of DEF now.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...