Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

I try to do at least 50 miles. I can make that longer and run the Interstate, I guess. And yes, as fast as I can get the hood up after shutdown. :dunno:

 

263K. She's tired and wants to take a dirt nap. :( 

 

 

Did you get any of the RLI 5w-30 when it was on sale?  Maybe try that, heck it might still be on sale.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

I try to do at least 50 miles. I can make that longer and run the Interstate, I guess. And yes, as fast as I can get the hood up after shutdown. :dunno:

 

263K. She's tired and wants to take a dirt nap. :( 

 

 

 

Is the air filter restricted? Plugs are seeing a lot of oil and fuel might change em out. Both these will drop your fuels dilute 1% or more. 

  • Thanks 1
  • 2 months later...
Posted

VOA Red Line Euro 5W40 from new plant.

 

Tis the stuff Raven is on. I bought two cases from the same lot. About 8 oil changes. This is the touchstone.

Major data is very close to the PDS from Phillips. Yea, still a good dose of POE in it. :) Initial OCI's are targeted for 3,750 miles or Mitsubishi's severe schedule. 

 

image.thumb.jpeg.54897f8b5a6deba3242de99de86a0a4b.jpeg

  • Like 3
  • 2 months later...
Posted
On 12/19/2024 at 2:21 PM, Grumpy Bear said:

VOA Red Line Euro 5W40 from new plant.

 

Tis the stuff Raven is on. I bought two cases from the same lot. About 8 oil changes. This is the touchstone.

Major data is very close to the PDS from Phillips. Yea, still a good dose of POE in it. :) Initial OCI's are targeted for 3,750 miles or Mitsubishi's severe schedule. 

 

image.thumb.jpeg.54897f8b5a6deba3242de99de86a0a4b.jpeg

Grump is this a recent or current formulation?  Looks like it.   

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, VicFirth said:

Grump is this a recent or current formulation?  Looks like it.   

 

Yes, I just had it run out of the bottle of the case I'm using. 

  • Thanks 2
Posted
On 10/11/2024 at 9:24 AM, customboss said:

Is the air filter restricted? Plugs are seeing a lot of oil and fuel might change em out. Both these will drop your fuels dilute 1% or more. 

Hook that pig up to a pro scanner and operate the EVAP solenoid valve via the scan tool and see if its sticking. As I recall ( LOL) you had it scanned ALONG time ago with your favorite mech/tech. Try again. May really help you.  

 

No need to drive to long to sample, I prefer a cold sample to one that's rushed after a short operation, 50 miles is needless brother. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Found this from my boxes of ancient history : circa 1980 

IMG_9591.thumb.jpeg.efcad9345756987296f086a83c335b8d.jpeg

 

IMG_9590.thumb.jpeg.591b6181eb9de6f5ed19539aae66ef13.jpeg
 


 

The lab still exists in some form. They do Phillips aviation oil samples. Anyone tried them? 

https://laboneinc.com  

 

IMG_9589.thumb.jpeg.bc9a1c5feb79d54526d8a15ab88ac68a.jpeg

Edited by customboss
Add info on a lab source
  • Like 1
Posted

I like the Vice Grip garage oil test. He’s famous for it only needs what it needs. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks. It’s not just the elemental analysis but the additive package in total. Amsoil

is more advanced and not off the shelf. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, VicFirth said:

I just received this from Red Line FYI

 

image.thumb.png.d0357b91a9c81696e41314da15b38cdb.png

 

That is quite a bit different than the results I got ;( 

 

Is this the Professional Series Line? Or the High Performance Line? 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
Posted
4 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

That is quite a bit different than the results I got ;( 

 

Is this the Professional Series Line? Or the High Performance Line? 

High Performance. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
17 hours ago, VicFirth said:

High Performance. 

 

@VicFirth do us a favor. Send my HP line VOA to your inside guy and ask, "What up" cause I can't get a response from them after 20 years plus now that Grandquist has retired. That far off is way more than difference in equipment. 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
On 2/21/2025 at 11:33 PM, Grumpy Bear said:

 

@VicFirth do us a favor. Send my HP line VOA to your inside guy and ask, "What up" cause I can't get a response from them after 20 years plus now that Grandquist has retired. That far off is way more than difference in equipment. 

Yeah unfortunately that was his response what I posted above.  If Dave G. was there I'd be able to find out.  He was the guy that told me some grades of Red Line use up to 40% POE.  

 

I think there was a tweak recently.  The only main difference is the mg level.

 

There was a 2022 or so FTIR done on the ROC site which showed Noack 4.7% for Red Line 5w30 Euro.  Substantial POE

 

image.thumb.png.6582ca664b8cbc986f26199009415944.png

Edited by VicFirth
  • Thanks 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 395 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is NOT impact damage nor neglect. There were previous class action lawsuits because of such paint preparation st GM manufacturing plant. Not just the Cherry Red Color. This paint is applied in three processes to obtain the desired color.  The manufacturer will cover for 36 months or 36k miles only. That rust is actually corrosion because of the paint process failure. Corrosion is covered for 100,100 miles or a certain months. However their corrosion doesn't include this type. Go figure. Clearly manufacturer knew from previous paint issues. This started 3 weeks ago out of the blue.  
    • Is it time to put a piece of tape over the CEL? 
    • consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...