Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So 5 years ago I bought a 1500 2wd, I regret not getting 4wd and looking at hauling an rv. I have several questions 

 

dad retired from GM, so theres the discount. 
im not wanting to order, local dealer has base models I like on the way.

gas! Is there 2 gas engines? Fuel economy is important. No to diesel.

is there a disadvantage to a 3500 from 2500? Like dot issues?

do there need the range device to stop 4 cylinder mode or having the engine shut off at stop lights?

6 speed transmission is good and reliable?

not sure what all I should be asking......

  • Like 1
Posted

6.6 gas is the base engine for 2500/3500s and the only gas "option."  The HDs don't have that cylinder deactivation crap, yet.  No clue on the DOT thing, that can also vary by your state DOT.  Personally if I was going to get a SRW I'd get a 3500 just for the extra capacity over the 2500 and unless things changed zero ride difference unloaded.  3500 DRW will ride rougher empty.  If fuel economy is important stick with a 1500 unless you're going to be towing heavy or a lot.

Posted

How big the camper is what I'd want to know.

 

If not huge, then a 2500 is the way to go in my opinion. Cost less and will ride a little better empty. The truck isn't going to get super good mileage, maybe high teens on the freeway and probably 8mpg towing.

Posted (edited)

I have a 2021 3500 hd srw cclb slt. Most of the time I have an 1800 lb pop up slide-in camper installed, which puts 1700 lbs on the rear axle (I weighed it).  I bought the 3500 because I wanted to be able to tow an 8000 lb boat trailer with the camper installed. 
 

Disadvantages of a 3500 relative to a 2500:

 

1) You have no choice in mirrors. The huge towing mirrors are it. They are nice when you are backing up, but block visibility the rest of the time.  It’s the most significant thing I don’t like about my truck. 
2) At bed loads from about 1500 to 3000 lbs, the rear overload springs are in contact part of the time, and you hear clunking as you go over bumps and dips each time the overloads hit the bumpers. The overloads statically begin to contact the bumpers on my truck at a bit above 2500 lbs of added rear axle load. In this 1500 to 3000 weight range you don’t need the overloads, so if the 2500 can meet your payload needs you might want to avoid this. 
3) In some states registering a 3500 will cost you more unless you buy a derate option. In other states, like WA where I live, the 3500 cost about $500 or $600 less to register yearly than a 2500 would have cost. So you have to research that for your state. 
4) Tire pressure warning on the rear is set higher on the 3500, so you are limited in how low you can run the rear tires to 62 psi, which is too high for best ride when running empty. 
 

There are some advantages to the 3500. Payload is the obvious one. 
 

 

Edited by Another JR
I had provided an incorrect statement, and MTU provided the correct info. Thanks MTU.
Posted

Just to update some incorrect information in this thread.   On gas models, the rear axle and drivetrain is the same between 2500 and 3500srw.  

 

The rear suspension is the main difference.  The 2500 is a two stage leaf spring where the 3500 is a three stage.   The 3500 is not just a 2500 spring pack with third stage added.   The main four leaf pack is same between the two but, the second stage (bottom leaf) engages quicker on 3500.  

 

Unloaded the 3500 rides similar to 2500 but a little worse.  On rougher roads the 3500 is worse due to the second stage, higher force in rear shock, and higher tire pressure.

 

#iworkforGM

Posted

Only one gas motor not two.  Not a lot of difference between the 2500 and 3500, 2500 is going to ride better and not as stiff.

 

The real question here is what do you plan on doing with it.  The 6.6 gas is a gas hog your looking at 10-12mpg depending on the situation.  I know you said no diesel and right now probably makes sense but if diesel were to drop and you factor in the savings on fuel mileage it might be a thought.

 

 

Posted
14 hours ago, Hoginedgewood said:

So 5 years ago I bought a 1500 2wd, I regret not getting 4wd and looking at hauling an rv. I have several questions 

 

dad retired from GM, so theres the discount. 
im not wanting to order, local dealer has base models I like on the way.

gas! Is there 2 gas engines? Fuel economy is important. No to diesel.

is there a disadvantage to a 3500 from 2500? Like dot issues?

do there need the range device to stop 4 cylinder mode or having the engine shut off at stop lights?

6 speed transmission is good and reliable?

not sure what all I should be asking......

 

Right On!  Nothing like the smell of a new truck & RV. :thumbs:

 

So far the only thing that hasn't been covered yet is the 6 speed transmission.  It is reliable, and when not pulling heavy is really nice.  Intermittently it will have a harsh downshift to 1st when going slow, but that is me getting very picky. lol

I'm a fan of simple, so I'm biased towards the 6L90E versus an 8 or 10 speed.  That wrote, I have found when pulling heavy through the mountains (14,600lbs 5th wheel) there are times I'd like a gear between 3rd & 4th.  Speculation is there "may" be a 10 speed coming in '24.  But by '24 there could be more things added, like start/stop & cylinder deactivation, or big price increases (purely speculative on my part).

 

If you like to tow fast (like keeping up with traffic) and you pick a heavy RV,  you may not like the 6.6L gas engine in the mountains.  When it comes to pulling through the mountains, my old Dodge with 325HP/600lbs-ft and exhaust brake is much easier.  That is the only time I miss the diesel engine. 

I don't try to keep up with traffic, I drive at or below the speed limit unloaded.  When towing, the max speed traveled is 62mph, or a couple of mph below the truck speed.  So, the gas engine works great in my case. 

Someone else on this forum pulls a slightly lighter 5th wheel (about 12Klbs) with the gas engine.  Hopefully he will chime in as well in this regard.  Chances are he also pulls faster than me. Like a normal human being would... lol

 

Good luck, and happy glamping! :cheers:

P.S. here is a link to the write up I've been doing as I get more experience towing.  Most of this is pretty subjective based on the experience.  Hope it is helpful.

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

MTU - Thanks as always for providing correct information. I misunderstood the design differences in the spring pack. I could swear I read/saw something somewhere that said the rear axle was different, but I just tracked down the video I looked at and saw that it’s 4 years old, so it must have been for the previous generation of hd trucks.  Thanks for your patience, contributions and polite corrections. I deleted my incorrect statements in the above post. 

 

Edited by Another JR
MTU knows his stuff
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, nards444 said:

Only one gas motor not two.  Not a lot of difference between the 2500 and 3500, 2500 is going to ride better and not as stiff.

 

The real question here is what do you plan on doing with it.  The 6.6 gas is a gas hog your looking at 10-12mpg depending on the situation.  I know you said no diesel and right now probably makes sense but if diesel were to drop and you factor in the savings on fuel mileage it might be a thought.

 

 

Edited by Another JR
Posted

Also going to add my rule of thumb after hauling things and have both 1/2 and 3/4 tons and diesel.  5-6k or under stay with a half ton cheaper, cheaper to run and just easier to drive.  Between 6-8k gets in the tweener stage, go on a handful of trips a year and not doing mountains get a half ton.  get up over 8-9k  better be in a bigger truck.  Ive hauled 10k with an ecoboost and did great but not something i would want to do all the time

  • Like 1
Posted
52 minutes ago, nards444 said:

Also going to add my rule of thumb after hauling things and have both 1/2 and 3/4 tons and diesel.  5-6k or under stay with a half ton cheaper, cheaper to run and just easier to drive.  Between 6-8k gets in the tweener stage, go on a handful of trips a year and not doing mountains get a half ton.  get up over 8-9k  better be in a bigger truck.  Ive hauled 10k with an ecoboost and did great but not something i would want to do all the time

This mirrors my experience.  The capabilities of a new half ton are very impressive, but there is just something about the stability of an HD with heavier trailers that is confidence inspiring.

Posted
17 minutes ago, sheath said:

This mirrors my experience.  The capabilities of a new half ton are very impressive, but there is just something about the stability of an HD with heavier trailers that is confidence inspiring.

People dont believe it buts its true.  Also most half tons today match or exceed 3/4 tons from late the 90s or early 2000s.  Motors really arent the most important thing but the motors in the half tons are just as powerful and sometimes more than the bigger truck, diesel excluded.   the 3.5 ecoboost is 400hp 500 torque where as the chevy 6.6 gas is 401 hp 464 torque,  and the ecoboost gets all that torque at 2500rpm not on a torque curve.

  • Like 1
Posted

I have towed 5 to 8 k trailers with my 1/2 ton Yukon XL, my 93 K2500 truck, and my 21 3500hd gas.  Increased weight of the tow vehicle, stiffer suspension and tires, longer wheelbase, and bigger brakes all contribute to better control of a large load.  Your ‘feel’ about the heavier duty truck being safer comes from all of these things, and is accurate.  I have a neighbor who has only ever driven half tons and he keeps spouting specs at me, and I keep telling him to go drive an hd truck. There’s no convincing some people to even try a different thing. 

  • Like 2
Posted

My first diesel pulling truck was a 91 Ram 3/4 ton. 165HP 400TQ. Truck and gooseneck was registered for 25K. The weight and brakes fell on the trailer. I’ve pulled equipment for 30 years. Placing the load weight and proper trailer brakes are the key. I’m not big on bumper pulling. Tail waging the dog. I definitely lean bigger truck for bumper pulling. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
23 hours ago, Another JR said:

I have towed 5 to 8 k trailers with my 1/2 ton Yukon XL, my 93 K2500 truck, and my 21 3500hd gas.  Increased weight of the tow vehicle, stiffer suspension and tires, longer wheelbase, and bigger brakes all contribute to better control of a large load.  Your ‘feel’ about the heavier duty truck being safer comes from all of these things, and is accurate.  I have a neighbor who has only ever driven half tons and he keeps spouting specs at me, and I keep telling him to go drive an hd truck. There’s no convincing some people to even try a different thing. 

 

Specs do matter and like I said a 2022 half ton would blow a 93 2500 out of the water.  But people have a hard time changing and really seeing the whole pictures.  Suspension, brakes, motor, weight of trailer and what kind, does it have brakes all things that matter.  

Edited by nards444
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks - I wasn't quite caffeinated this morning. 2:1 makes sense, turning the crankshaft 360 degrees will turn the cam 180 degrees, and had I done that, the cam's dot would be at 6 and the crank's at 12 again.   I went ahead and took the sprocket off anyway, aligned everything dot-to-dot including the balance shaft just for s&g. I'm glad I did because I discovered no Loctite on the timing sprocket bolts. Maybe it's not required, but at only 20 ft-lb torque spec, those bolts aren't in there very tight. Cleaned and reassembled with some thread locker and torqued.   A general observation: Less is more with RTV. If a little doesn't stop a leak, a LOT probably won't, either. RTV is thinly veiled revenge, in a tube...      
    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...