Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
12 hours ago, Chuck FB said:

 

This comment dives into what a youtube channel called DemonWorks who is a GM mechanic that works a lot on the 3.0 engine at his day job but also has owned numerous personal 3.0 trucks and he had done UOA with a variety of 0W-20 oil brands and then switched it up to a 5W-30 on his current truck and I believe he generated a couple of 5W-30 tests and so far there was certainly a statistical drop in wear metals. I think now he is trying a 0W-30 for the winter and so those UOA's are yet to be generated. One thing is for sure, it takes time to create UOA's with a daily driver and the odd long distance trip within that at times, there is no instant gratification "answer" like a person would desire as of course owners of the 3.0 intently watching his results want answers now so they can make a possible better oil choice now, not years from now and I can understand that. Collecting good quality long term data is not a five minute gratification process but that is a statement your more than well aware of !, its a statement I mention for others reading my post. 

 

Admittedly, I'm a DemonWorks skeptic. He is a tech and who also has experience with his own trucks. I have yet to see anything beyond his own anecdotal experience and providing information about the 3.0 diesel which is easily obtained.

 

I'm keeping an open mind, but the few Youtube videos I've watched I've actually become nauseous (lack of image stabilization on his cameras) and have not learned anything I did not already learn from other sources.

  • Haha 1
Posted

Shorter OCI's with better oil, not off the shelf oil, problem solved IMO. You know I like Amsoil.

  • Like 2
Posted
37 minutes ago, Atlas said:

 

Admittedly, I'm a DemonWorks skeptic. He is a tech and who also has experience with his own trucks. I have yet to see anything beyond his own anecdotal experience and providing information about the 3.0 diesel which is easily obtained.

 

I'm keeping an open mind, but the few Youtube videos I've watched I've actually become nauseous (lack of image stabilization on his cameras) and have not learned anything I did not already learn from other sources.

At around 13:00 he addresses high viscosity oil in the 3.0 diesel and the wear reduction.IMG_4792.thumb.jpeg.3e57c2ef50c246c43546f400c2cacde7.jpeg

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
44 minutes ago, OnTheReel said:

At around 13:00 he addresses high viscosity oil in the 3.0 diesel and the wear reduction.IMG_4792.thumb.jpeg.3e57c2ef50c246c43546f400c2cacde7.jpeg

 

I'd say Geeks' video validated every thing I've ever said.

Guess it just needed to be said by someone else.

I'm good with that. 

 

  • Like 4
  • Sad 1
Posted
1 hour ago, OnTheReel said:

At around 13:00 he addresses high viscosity oil in the 3.0 diesel and the wear reduction.IMG_4792.thumb.jpeg.3e57c2ef50c246c43546f400c2cacde7.jpeg

GM 3.0 diesel? He never says. What 3.0? European? Soot loading is NOT an issue in modern diesels. Lake mixes up gasoline engines with diesel engines. 
 

The video proves nothing about the GM 3.0 diesel using whatever vis you decide above 9 cSt @ 100c 

 

Again Grumpy and anyone that decides to run more viscous oil in your new under warranty GM 3.0 TD and show the results. 

Posted (edited)
36 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

I'd say Geeks' video validated every thing I've ever said.

Guess it just needed to be said by someone else.

I'm good with that. 

 

Of course you would. 
Do you also BELIEVE that particle counts aren’t influenced by additives not heat cycled, water content adhearing to those same additives? 
Do you also BELIEVE liquid hydraulic ( oil filters) get more efficient with time? 

Edited by customboss
Posted

BTW @customboss, I put you back on ignore. Not because of what you say but because I'm reactive and when I react I am no longer on task. I'm like a dog compelled to chase the squirrel which distracts me from the point I'm trying to express. Ignore allows me to hide the distraction AND see posts in order written preserving my train of thought.  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

GM diesel 3.0 turbo diesel 

 

GM specifies SAE 0W-20 viscosity oil meeting the dexosD standard for the 3.0L Duramax (LM2 and LZ0) to optimize fuel economy, cold-start flow, and emissions system performance like DPF efficiency. Owner debates often favor thicker oils like 5W-30 based on used oil analysis (UOA) showing lower wear metals (e.g., iron ppm dropping from ~40-60 on 0W-20 to ~25-30 on 5W-30 after thousands of miles), arguing better hot protection for towing or high-heat use. No public GM test data directly compares viscosities, but the spec ties to their variable-displacement oil pump (26-41 PSI on LM2, up to 38-52 PSI on LZ0) and wet oil-pump belt design, which relies on thin oil for lubrication without a tensioner.[duramaxnews +4]

 

GM Rationale
dexosD 0W-20 prioritizes low viscosity for pump efficiency, reduced friction (boosting ~1-2 mpg highway), and belt longevity in oil (150k miles LM2, 200k LZ0). Engineering focuses on BSFC and EGTs over max wear protection, with cold-flow aiding starts in varied climates like Colorado winters.[backwoodsdiesel +4]

Posted
2 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

BTW @customboss, I put you back on ignore. Not because of what you say but because I'm reactive and when I react I am no longer on task. I'm like a dog compelled to chase the squirrel which distracts me from the point I'm trying to express. Ignore allows me to hide the distraction AND see posts in order written preserving my train of thought.  

Understood. Do what you need to do. Keep that mental and physical health going. 
 

Im not attacking you personally. I’m challenging broad comments that have some science base but not The whole taco. 
Be well. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, customboss said:

GM 3.0 diesel? He never says. What 3.0? European? Soot loading is NOT an issue in modern diesels. Lake mixes up gasoline engines with diesel engines. 
 

The video proves nothing about the GM 3.0 diesel using whatever vis you decide above 9 cSt @ 100c 

 

Again Grumpy and anyone that decides to run more viscous oil in your new under warranty GM 3.0 TD and show the results. 

Well, there’s only one 3.0 diesel left in production, and only one that ever called for 0w20. Not hard to read the tea leaves.

 

The FCA 3.0 spec went from 5w30 to 5w40 before they put it out to pasture. Ford 3.0 was 5w30. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, OnTheReel said:

At around 13:00 he addresses high viscosity oil in the 3.0 diesel and the wear reduction.

 

I must have missed where he was talking about the 3.0 specifically because I didn't catch that. He just said diesel engines dirty the oil with soot, and soot accumulation leads to more wear. All true. Soot will accumulate with whatever weight oil is chosen over the OCI.

 

The takeaway, which he gets to at the end, is changing oil more frequently keeps oil cleaner and reduces wear. I didn't read into a specific recommendation on oil viscosity for the 3.0, just that in general a higher viscosity oil reduces wear according to a chart.

 

I'm willing to give it credibility, but none of the contributors here nor in anything I've watched actually explain what a higher viscosity oil buys. Is that the difference between 200k and 400k miles or is it more like the difference between 500k and 515k miles, if the rest of the engine components happen to last that long?

 

If GM recommends 0w20 because they think it's the best intersection of efficiency and longevity and the end user stands to get 200k+ out of the engine on their prescribed oil change intervals, I think that's an acceptable life for a 1500. I'll be done with mine by 200k even if it's in perfect shape.

Edited by Atlas
  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, Atlas said:

 

I must have missed where he was talking about the 3.0 specifically because I didn't catch that. He just said diesel engines dirty the oil with soot, and soot accumulation leads to more wear. All true. Soot will accumulate with whatever weight oil is chosen over the OCI.

 

The takeaway, which he gets to at the end, is changing oil more frequently keeps oil cleaner and reduces wear. I didn't read into a specific recommendation on oil viscosity for the 3.0, just that in general a higher viscosity oil reduces wear according to a chart.

 

I'm willing to give it credibility, but none of the contributors here nor in anything I've watched actually explain what a higher viscosity oil buys. Is that the difference between 200k and 400k miles or is it more like the difference between 500k and 515k miles, if the rest of the engine components happen to last that long?

It MIGHT get you 10 ppm less of iron wear with Exxon Mobil 0w20 Dexos D oil in use. 

 

Most likely mean nothing in 200,000 miles of use. 
 

Use Amsoil 0w-20 Dexos D oil and stay in grade AND have LOW iron wear. 

Maybe get you 300,000 -400,000 miles of use if maintained well. 
 

Use a too viscous oil and throw a timing belt, hold heat needlessly among others I listed above from GM design comments. 

 

  • Like 2
Posted

First OCI on my 3.0 was 508 miles. It just hit 1500 miles and it's getting changed again. when I get home. It's sitting in the garage with a battery tender on it.

 

So I guess I'm taking some of Lake's advice to heart. I have a case of ESPx2 0w20 DexosD sitting there waiting. Sounds like I should throw it out 🤣

 

My 6.2 gasser (Camaro) hasn't gone more than 500 miles on an OCI, but that's driven more by time and not miles. 0w40 Supercar.

  • Like 2
Posted
3 hours ago, Atlas said:

 

Admittedly, I'm a DemonWorks skeptic. He is a tech and who also has experience with his own trucks. I have yet to see anything beyond his own anecdotal experience and providing information about the 3.0 diesel which is easily obtained.

 

I'm keeping an open mind, but the few Youtube videos I've watched I've actually become nauseous (lack of image stabilization on his cameras) and have not learned anything I did not already learn from other sources.

 

Filming and trying to work on something at the same time, I see that theme with various mechanics that are doing all the shots themselves. As to the lack of content for some aspects of an engine in real time, I know what your saying and I have gotten the impression and of no real surprise that he is not allowed to be pissing around with that at work. So I can understand your question mark based on lack of more complete content. So as to the oil analysis, its one persons sampling and lab results and so definitely others doing the same theme on the same vehicle/engine type would help give a better statistic theme to draw from for sure. 

 

One interesting item that I gather tends to be somewhat of a theme with the 3.0 and that is fuel dilution because of regens and I recall that DemonWorks truck was doing an insane amount of regens or so it seemed and he was doing various software updates that was hopefully going to improve that and it may have. Its how that engine injects its fuel into the DPF by way of using the engines fuel injectors firing into the cylinder at non firing times that I understand is the culprit to part of the fuel dilution issue. Emissions period and done in an idiotic way, like that is going to help the engine and yes who knows how much that has in itself contributed to the engine wear metals.  

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Atlas said:

First OCI on my 3.0 was 508 miles. It just hit 1500 miles and it's getting changed again. when I get home. It's sitting in the garage with a battery tender on it.

 

So I guess I'm taking some of Lake's advice to heart. I have a case of ESPx2 0w20 DexosD sitting there waiting. Sounds like I should throw it out 🤣

 

My 6.2 gasser (Camaro) hasn't gone more than 500 miles on an OCI, but that's driven more by time and not miles. 0w40 Supercar.

 

While its not like I have any personal data to draw on other than what I come across online, I too have wondered with my L8T, what is the most logical approach to the engines health AND at the same time maintaining my wonderful GM warranty. While it may fly in the states to use oils that are said to meet a certain spec ( Dexos 1 Gen 3, or its the DexosD in your case ) , if it doesn't carry the actual license it becomes an issue here in Canada from how the dealer is telling me. 

 

So my view point based off of the picture I am faced with here, is that if I had a 3.0 I would more than likely initially stick with the DexosD licensed 0W-20 and change it plenty often and certainly during the break in stages as it sure can't hurt anything. Because of the soot factor and the potential for the fuel dilution the 3.0 seems to have issues with, that also helps reinforce the concept of no matter what oil is used, get that soot and diesel diluted oil out of there by changing it a lot more often then the oil change minder would call for. Unfortunately no matter how much one would spend on a high end oil of the same viscosity as GM calls for, it can't help but get contaminated with soot and raw diesel fuel. If the unit was deleted, yes that would take care of a lot of the soot contamination issues and the diesel dilution ... and wave bye bye to your warranty. They got us all by the balls no matter what brand of vehicle one buys !. 

  • Thanks 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,677 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • I have 2 choices. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...