Jump to content

OCI, not when but why?

Grumpy Bear
 Share

Recommended Posts

Homer1959 Enthusiast

Homer1959

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

I can find no error in your response. Sure, anything is possible. But let me run this by you. 

 

 

Referring to the red bold underlined section. That implies SOPUS knows exactly what sufficient IS and can quantify it. It also says that whatever this IS and as far down the ladder of real possibility is may lie beneath what can BE it will exceed by MORE than was it required. So....ask I ask you....what level of wear, of cleanliness of corrosion protection, of thermal properties is SUFFICIENT for you and why anyone but the end user should be allowed to determine what they DESERVE? 

 

Let me be so bold as to answer that for you. API/ILSAC/ACEA and the OEM's are telling us what is sufficient protection and yet that level they have determined as sufficient is FAILING. Not to adequately service the warranty and their margins but to provide a level of protection that benefits' the end user which other than their back account they could care less about. I know this just on a cleanliness basis by the SAE test requirements and acceptable levels of deposit formation.

 

So yes, a Group II/III blend with a robust package that will pass the SAE certifications and the OEM licensing requirements will indeed provide a level that will get the powertrain past whatever dismally low length of time and miles they warranty the product is for (their bar for Sufficient) and it will do so with a level of 'acceptable' failures that will keep the bean counters in happy land. Courts are full of oil related ring failure class action law suits. 

 

SOPUS did not error in statement. It errors in judgement and it does so willingly and at the end users expense for gain. It is a business run by the same greed as most other business. I took the same marketing classes they take. LOL. 

 

But rest assured. On base oil alone, the statement that a Group II/II+/III/III+/GTL is equivalent to or better than a PAO/POE/AN is a bold faced LIE. The statement that a well formulated Group III with and excellent add package can outperform a POA with a crap add pack is a "Strawman argument". Is it possible, yes, but...can you find me an example? I don't think so, I know so. Not in any 'recognized' brand name product. 

 

Here are a few easy examples. A Group III has a possible range of viscosity that lies between 4 and 8 cSt. GTL is even lower https://www.stle.org/files/TLTArchives/2015/11_November/Worldwide.aspx Shell sells only the 3 cSt oil to the market. So to build a *W30 some VII will be required. However blends of POA/mPOA can yield the full viscosity range without any VII for many grades and much less in the widest ranges. And it will do so with a neat VI high enough to use a fraction of the VII's. 

 

Then there is the thermal capacity and thermal transfer rates. PAO's excel in both allowing most gear boxes to run 15 F cooler. 

 

Both are non polar and require some co-base to reach an aniline point low enough to hold that 'robust' add package. For Group III's that is a Group I or Group II or both sacrificing almost all advantage the Group III's bring. OR a PAO blended with a POE or AN will yield not just a lower add pack with greater solubility but greatly enhance, by synergies, both lubricity and oxidation resistance. The addition of the Ester also dramatically enhances the film strength (HTHS) for the same grade viscosity and in nearly every case the SSI will be MUCH lower than anything one can whip up with a mineral oil derived base. 

 

Lastly a low VII product with an robust Ester or AN co-base will keep it assembly day clean for as long as you wish to run it PROVIDED a reasonable OCI. It doesn't have a 'required minimum deposit level". 

 

Now all that blather aside. I take no issue with anyone pouring Mineral based 'syn' oil into their motor and running it for whatever OEM dictated OCI's are run. Not my dog, not my fight and not my wallet. 

 

Don't be tricked by slick marketing even from the majors. I worked in Research for several Majors. They ALL lie. they don't make money by using the most expensive high performance products. They use the cheapest crap they can and tell you "It is just as good". 

 

Marketing is the business of the most profitable artful lie. 

 

 

What’s the Holy Graal for my new 2025 Sierra 2500 HD gas model then—something I can easily grab off the shelf at a big store, not from some obscure boutique? Maybe Amsoil? Or should I just use what I already have and hope for the best? I’ve got four 5-liter jugs of QS 5W-40 Euro ready to go in, and I’m not worried about the warranty since I can provide all the receipts needed to prove I’ve used Dexos-approved oil 😉

  • Replies 843
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

diyer2
diyer2

Had to do it. 😀

OnTheReel
OnTheReel

I was talking to a guy who swears Amsoil in his transmission stopped the slip yoke on the driveshaft from binding and thumping. The slip yoke is bolted to a flange on the back of the transfer case so

Grumpy Bear
Grumpy Bear

I'd say Geeks' video validated every thing I've ever said. Guess it just needed to be said by someone else. I'm good with that.   

Posted Images

diyer2 Senior Enthusiast

diyer2

Posted
Posted

One question Homer? Do you plan on keeping this truck a long time? If so use your off the shelf oil just shorten the OCI's, 5k? If the cost doesn't bother you switch to a higher quality oil with the same OCI's.

  • Like 2
KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted

I’ve mentioned several times over the years how Amsoil hydraulic oil has save my company thousands over the years. And how in the 80s through the early 2000s we went extended up to 25K miles with their oil. Extending hours in our ROW equipment. Did oil analysis and became a dealer. Other oils eventually caught up or at least got close. I don’t drive as much retired and don’t go extended. And I drive in town more vs highway. With the changes internally with most engines extending oil drains is not advisable for most people. I’m convinced 5K oil changes should be the maximum. I don’t use one brand anymore. Honda oil, Valvoline, GM, Mobile one and Amsoil. Who’s the best? I don’t know. If I did my own changes I would use Amsoil. All my daily drivers are plus 150K and use no oil. I know Grumpy test all the time with real world results. Can’t go wrong there. That’s my 2 cents.

  • Like 2
Homer1959 Enthusiast

Homer1959

Posted
Posted
On 3/24/2026 at 9:57 AM, diyer2 said:

One question Homer? Do you plan on keeping this truck a long time? If so use your off the shelf oil just shorten the OCI's, 5k? If the cost doesn't bother you switch to a higher quality oil with the same OCI's.

7 years or 60k is my goal. We use it  solely to pull our TT from quebec to texas for the annual snowbird trip. At that time ill be 73 so ill be done with camping. Ill follow the OCI and do minimum maintenance on it, no need to invest more than i have to do in this truck 

Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 3/24/2026 at 8:47 AM, Homer1959 said:

What’s the Holy Graal for my new 2025 Sierra 2500 HD gas model then—something I can easily grab off the shelf at a big store, not from some obscure boutique? Maybe Amsoil? Or should I just use what I already have and hope for the best? I’ve got four 5-liter jugs of QS 5W-40 Euro ready to go in, and I’m not worried about the warranty since I can provide all the receipts needed to prove I’ve used Dexos-approved oil 😉

 

On 3/25/2026 at 10:53 AM, Homer1959 said:

7 years or 60k is my goal. We use it  solely to pull our TT from quebec to texas for the annual snowbird trip. At that time ill be 73 so ill be done with camping. Ill follow the OCI and do minimum maintenance on it, no need to invest more than i have to do in this truck 

 

Given you goal dyier2 hit it pretty much square. Use the QS 5W40 Euro and change is on a shorter schedule. Whatever your OEM recommended OCI /2. I'm going to guess that at 3,750 miles or 6K Kilometers. You want to use AMSOIL SS 0W40 go 5K and call it a day. You want to go longer? Do a few OCI's on your choice but if not then flying blind my suggestions stands. 😉 

  • Like 1
Black02Silverado Senior Enthusiast

Black02Silverado

Posted
Posted
On 3/25/2026 at 11:53 AM, Homer1959 said:

7 years or 60k is my goal. We use it  solely to pull our TT from quebec to texas for the annual snowbird trip. At that time ill be 73 so ill be done with camping. Ill follow the OCI and do minimum maintenance on it, no need to invest more than i have to do in this truck 

Any off the shelf oil would be fine, especially if you are not planning on keeping it.  But one thing to look into is keeping the inside clean.  Valvoline made Restore & Protect because even with 5k oil changes the inside still carbons up, especially the rings using most off shelf oils.  Now using a higher quality oil like AMSOIL would prevent that.  Most look at UOA's but now there is a different view to oils, which keeps the inside clean and rings free? To me the extra cost is worth it.  

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Black02Silverado Senior Enthusiast

Black02Silverado

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Z45 said:

fyi  This is good.

 

https://www.autoblog.com/news/valvoline-sued-after-using-the-wrong-oil-in-customers-engine


 

 

Would not have been an issue if they put the correct oil in.  General public mostly goes unaware when they go to quick lube oil changes.
 

This is why I change my own oil. 

  • Like 1
Z45 Senior Enthusiast

Z45

Posted
Posted

Oh, I thought the consensus on these forums was 0W- oil is NO GOOD, don't use?

PunchT37 Enthusiast

PunchT37

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Z45 said:

Oh, I thought the consensus on these forums was 0W- oil is NO GOOD, don't use?

I`m one of those. Unless I`m on the arctic circle, no 0w oils for me.

KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Z45 said:

fyi  This is good.

 

https://www.autoblog.com/news/valvoline-sued-after-using-the-wrong-oil-in-customers-engine

 

I use Valvoline quick lube. They use oil from a drum. Being most vehicles use 0-20 I find it hard to believe they would use anything different unless asked. My recipe says oil specified as well as my window sticker. Most vehicles specify the weight on the filter cap. I’m skeptical to say the least.

  • 2 months later...
Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
  • Author
Posted

ISO 4406 and OCI

 

Do you know what it is and does it matter? 

 

 

 

 

diyer2 Senior Enthusiast

diyer2

Posted
Posted

What oil, how frequent it's changed and who does it a personal choice. I will change my oil myself with the products I like until I no longer can do it. 

No one touches my vehicles, toys or other motors unless it can't be avoided. 

  • Like 3
Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 6/12/2026 at 12:38 AM, Grumpy Bear said:

ISO 4406 and OCI

Do you know what it is and does it matter? 

 

On 6/12/2026 at 10:09 AM, diyer2 said:

What oil, how frequent it's changed and who does it a personal choice. 

 

I would not argue that with you. It would be pointless to argue against the truth and you speak the truth. 

 

My question and in fact the entire point of this thread is an exploration into the levers of wear which happens no matter how well we maintain our powertrains. 

 

Some of these levers we exert a good deal of influence over which can and do result is lower wear, longer powertrain life. Some others we are sort of stuck with. 

 

An engine is typically done when the ring to bore seal no longer is able to do the job effectively. Normally the first thing to go in a engine otherwise well maintained and adult driven is this seal. 

 

Looking into the means, methods, products and attitudes that influence the rate of wear seems a worthwhile inquiry to me. 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Ryanwehr14
      2018 Sierra 1500 Transfer Case Leak

      By Ryanwehr14 · Posted

      A while back, my truck (2018 GMC Sierra 1500 5.3) went in for an o2 sensor and routine service. The tech identified that my rear output seal on my transfer case was leaking, and recommended I have them replace it. At the time I didn't think anything of it, and had them do the repair. Less than a month later, I noticed that the recently repaired seal was leaking again. I called the shop that did the repair and they warrantied the repair and replaced the same seal again. A few months later, I noticed that once again the same seal leak had come back. It wasn't a great time to bring it in and I ended up just living with it for 6 months or so, noticing small (smaller than a baseball) size oil stains below the truck when it would sit for a while, as well as oil spray on the frame (to the point where it actually took the underbody coating off in that one spot). Finally got around to brining it in again, but this time I took it to a dealership service center since I am in a different part of the state for school. They identified the same output seal leaks and recommended they replace them. They also said there was no scoring on the inside of the transfer case, so it didn't need to be replaced. They chalked up the original repair failures to non oem seals and a job that wasn't done correctly. Now they called and said the seals are holding after driving/sitting for a while, but they found a very small leak in the middle, that they recommended they seal with some kind of silicone/jb weld (not sure what they are using). I haven't picked up the truck yet, but I have been reluctant about this whole repair process because I feel like they are just fixing the same thing that keeps coming back, and I am concerned there could be another root cause for the seal failing. Has anybody else experienced anything like this, or have any ideas on other things that could be the root cause?
    • Fishbones
      2012 Sierra 1500 AC issues

      By Fishbones · Posted

      I just started having AC issues with my 2012 Sierra. The symptom is blowing warm air on all vents.  Here is what I have checked so far. Compressor clutch appears to be engaging and cycling  I checked all fuses and relay, no issues. The only thing I have notices is the short line that comes from the firewall is very cold / frosted. This line is approximately 12 inches long. The coldness stops when it hits the first line connector. As far as AC compressor - At first start the clutch engages, runs continually, Short AC line frosts up. After idling for several minutes the AC line thaws out some but is still cool and the compressor clutch starts cycling on and off every 5 seconds.  Any suggestions on what to look at next would be appreciated.  
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Unless you are using a bypass filer system with a Beta of 1000 at 2 micron the commercial filters we have access to, even the very best of them, are poor at the 5 to 10 micron range the typical UOA test can 'see'. Point is there are some truly awful filters being sold A 45 micron Beta 75 filter is what Dyson used to call a screen door on a submarine. That leaves wear metals disconnected from filtration unless particulates are larger than the test can 'see' and yet captured by the filter...which is its job. If that is true then you have a major issue screaming at you.    The graph isn't mine. It belongs to GM and their study on this area. I looked up those studies and provided those SAE tech paper addresses multiple times. Machinery Lubrication displayed it and confirmed it. So if you have doubts about the study you'll have to take it up with GM Engineering. Just like you would have to take up a difference in opinion about the meaning a word with Webster or the length of on inch with the National Institute of Standards and Technology.      Most manuals have two schedules. "Normal Service" and "Severe Service". On it's face it tells you that oil in severe service is more highly stressed and doesn't "Last as Long". The item to bore in on is LAST...what does that mean?    It's the same question one asks about how long to toast bread. What are the inputs? Bread type? Wattage of the toaster? Distance from the elements? What is your preferred level of done?    So lets paint this with a broader brush. Oil is made up of the base and the additive package. The first is altered by heat and oxygen and later is sacrificial with a finite life subject to inputs toward that end. Resistance and supply.    It is the reason an OEM's OCI's are determined by 1.) the specifications of the recommended lubricant and 2.) risk management toward the bottom line. Those lubricants are also subject to cost effectiveness for the OEM.    There is a tendency for most people to believe that the OEM recommended oil rest on the top shelf and that anything other is lesser than. Truth is there are more oils on higher shelves than those on the lower shelf below the OEM's. They make that choice on COST TO THE OEM. Testing is incidental to the margin.    GM makes MONEY, the car/truck is a TOOL to leverage MONEY. Insert whatever car brand you like. Until you forking over a million plus COST not quality is the driver. Thus it is by DESIGN the recommended OCI's and oils fall well short of 'best practice protections'. Proof isn't hard to find. GM Ecotec I-4 2400 breather system and cold start PCM tuning has killed more motors and resulted in more litigation for those that used the 'recommended' practice than GM could bear. What was their response? SHORTEN THE OCI. TWICE.    I don't know how long to leave oil in an I don't know how the oil will respond to MY circumstances and because I don't and can't blanket statement or anecdotal evidence my way out of it.....I TEST and FIND the right OCI for the oil I CHOOSE. There is no shortcut but there is blind allegiance. I don't blindly trust anything.    People hear the word 'detergent' and believe that in the context of oil it means the same thing as laundry soap... Only in the most rudimentary way. It's the first additive to give up on you and they are putting less and less with each new API standard. Solvency can be used but it cost. Some unique undisclosed chemistries can be used. Valvoline R & P in example. OEM's haven't an interest in anything they see as limiting market participation. Whatever.         
    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      For some unexplained reason my father wanted a salvage yard. As we were getting the family business off the ground one brother ran the salvage yard. We gathered there when rained out working on pipelines in the eighties to pull parts. Perfectly good running vehicles would come to us simply because they wouldn’t pass emissions inspection. We were able to swap parts and sell some of them. I got a clean old nova with a bad engine. I pulled a perfectly good small block out a Camaro. A father and son project with a rebuilt engine. The son couldn’t get the engine running right. The problem was the spark plugs weren’t gapped. The 90s vehicles probably widened the gap of shade tree do it yourself engine repair. My do it yourself hot rod repair stopped at the 70s. After that my trusted mechanic kept them in running shape. 
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      I have an old dental chair in my shop. Something I got for free and apparently it has more than scrap value? People collect them although mine isn't restored or anything. It's visually interesting (1930's Ritter) which is why I like it. And it IS decently comfortable if you kick back.   When a good buddy of mine saw it he said, let me guess, Atlas. It's a conversation piece? As in, you ask the questions, they do the talking?   Where do you hide the jar of teeth?   I would never.   

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...