Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

2022 Custom Model, Crewcab short bed 4x4.  It has the tri fold tonneau cover and the 6" steps.   Full tank of gas with my wife and I in it.  Maybe 100lbs in the back seat area with the seats folded up weighed on Thursday.  See the attached CAT scale ticket.  Second weigh in and pic was today, full tank of gas, wife and I, and our 2023 Grand Design 2800BH with a full fresh water tank (52 gallons, approx 420lbs) that is located directly in front of the campers axles.  It was an interesting test for me.  We never go dry camping, but might in the future.  Anyhow I was shocked at how much it weighed with a full tank of gas with just my wife and I in it.  We total 350 on a bad day...lol....So damn, the beast needs to go on a diet.....LOL!!!

20221215_153059.jpg

20221217_181130.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

For those of you that tow with these huge beasts, our camper weighed in at exactly 8klbs.  We towed it 255 miles today, got 8.6mpg on back roads and highway 280 heading towards Goodwater, AL.  Not bad at all in my opinion.  Never a problem with power, never a problem at all.  That thing will tow 8klbs. without even breaking a sweat.  I LOVE our beast!!!!  Best truck ever!!!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

Boy , that's a heavy truck! Is it a 2500HD? what engine? What is the GVW? My older trucks with lift gates and plow frames and tools are like 6200 with full tanks and me (275lb)

Edited by richard wysong
Posted (edited)
30 minutes ago, richard wysong said:

Boy , that's a heavy truck! Is it a 2500HD? what engine? What is the GVW? My older trucks with lift gates and plow frames and tools are like 6200 with full tanks and me (275lb)

Yup, just a plain jane 2500HD custom gasser.  She's a porker, but I love every ounce of her.....the beast as we call it.  Well I call it the big chicken, makes my wife laugh....lol...  I just saw on your profile that you live in Beverly MA.  I lived in Chelmsford back in the mid 80's going to aircraft school in Boston.  Very cool.  I was a mall cop at the Burlington mall back in 86.....LOL.......  I was best known as the guy who could open up any car door with a slim jim....lol....People would lock themselves out of their car, call mall security.  And it was me opening up their doors......great memories....and no I was never a thief or stole cars.  I had the gift of opening them up is all...lol.....We get up that way often for friends in Salem, NH.

Edited by Jettech1
Posted

They all weigh that much. You said with you and the wife and a bit of gear. Sounds right. My WT is 7,131 according to the door plaque. If I added my weight and wife’s plus a bit of gear it would be the same. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, Pryme said:

They all weigh that much. You said with you and the wife and a bit of gear. Sounds right. My WT is 7,131 according to the door plaque. If I added my weight and wife’s plus a bit of gear it would be the same. 

The reason I posted that is because I haven't seen anyone else's CAT scales numbers.  I was just surprised at how heavy they really are with 2 people, full tank of gas, and bit of gear in it.  My door decal says 7178, so going from that to 7780 just shocked me a bit is all.  My wife and I can makeup 350 of the extra weight plus the tonneau cover plus the 6" wide steps and a bit of gear, perhaps 100lbs or less.  Weird how the weight can add up quickly.

Edited by Jettech1
Posted

My 3500hd cclb srw slt with dual batteries, full tank, 200 lbs in the driver seat, 60 lb rubber mat in the bed, and minus the 75 lb tailgate has a front axle weight of 4440 and a rear axle weight of 3260 per a local certified truck scale.  
 

Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, Another JR said:

My 3500hd cclb srw slt with dual batteries, full tank, 200 lbs in the driver seat, 60 lb rubber mat in the bed, and minus the 75 lb tailgate has a front axle weight of 4440 and a rear axle weight of 3260 per a local certified truck scale.  
 

Sounds about right.  A little nose heavy (compared to mine) probably because of your dual batteries.  Your rear axle weight is kind of light with a long bed as compared to my short bed.  And I have the tri-fold heavy tonneau cover.  Interesting...But still right in the area of being quite close to the same.  Edit: perhaps the long bed puts a little more weight on the front axle due to it's extended length.  Hmmmm, food for thought....and thank you for replying....this is all very interesting to me....

Edited by Jettech1
Posted

I'm just curious as to what the GVW is on these trucks?  the payload on my 98 is 2400lbs  with a gvw of 8600 and on my 04 which is only 2wd it's 3300lbs with a gvw of 9300lbs. both trucks are single cab, 8ft beds with liftgates. It seems the 4 doors etc add quite a bit of weight so did they increase the GVW? In Massachusettes a truck over 10000 gvw needs a special inspection ($135) and has to have commercial plates. There may be exceptions though

Posted
3 minutes ago, richard wysong said:

I'm just curious as to what the GVW is on these trucks?  the payload on my 98 is 2400lbs  with a gvw of 8600 and on my 04 which is only 2wd it's 3300lbs with a gvw of 9300lbs. both trucks are single cab, 8ft beds with liftgates. It seems the 4 doors etc add quite a bit of weight so did they increase the GVW? In Massachusettes a truck over 10000 gvw needs a special inspection ($135) and has to have commercial plates. There may be exceptions though

 

20220901_185009.jpg

Posted

I hope that pic helps.  It's the one on my 2022 Custom model 2500HD gasser.

Posted
16 minutes ago, Jettech1 said:

 

20220901_185009.jpg

Close to the same as mine but your slightly heavier curb weight means you lost just a tad of payload. I can carry a few more cases for beer at 3,519 haha. Also with the plow prep my front end is 5,600. Otherwise identical plaques

  • Like 1
Posted

10650 GVW, payload 3472 give or take so they did raise the GVW to make up for the weight of the truck itself. I will have to research to see how the DMV is dealing with the heavier trucks. Last time I was doing inspections if you attempted to inspect anything over 10k the computer screen would turn red and then cancel the inspection and it would have to go to a commercial vehicle inspection facility

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, richard wysong said:

10650 GVW, payload 3472 give or take so they did raise the GVW to make up for the weight of the truck itself. I will have to research to see how the DMV is dealing with the heavier trucks. Last time I was doing inspections if you attempted to inspect anything over 10k the computer screen would turn red and then cancel the inspection and it would have to go to a commercial vehicle inspection facility

Very interesting.  Please let us all know what you find out.  Here in GA they could careless.  But I do know many states that go beserk with anything over 10k....

Posted
28 minutes ago, Pryme said:

Close to the same as mine but your slightly heavier curb weight means you lost just a tad of payload. I can carry a few more cases for beer at 3,519 haha. Also with the plow prep my front end is 5,600. Otherwise identical plaques

Ok you win with the beer comment....lol....my favorite beverage of all....well aside from Gentlemen Jack whiskey.  But beer is my life blood....lol....

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...