Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The owner's manual is very vague when it comes to using a WDH. It essentially states that a WDH is not required at all unless using MT or OOR tires, then only after 10,000#s. What are OOR tires anyway, AT tires? I've never heard tires called that before...

 

Anyway, then looking at the trailering info on my door it states that my tongue weight limit is 1450#s. Ok, but if using a WDH doesn't that increase the maximum tongue weight to around 2000#s? If not, then there are 3/4-ton trucks out there with much higher allowable tongue weights than our 1-ton trucks. 4k# payload but 1450# tongue weight?

 

I'm looking at conventional hitch toy haulers and most of them are already close to 1450# dry tongue weight and some are over that. But according to my door sticker my "1-ton" truck can't tow them.

 

What gives?

Screenshot_20230219_185920_Microsoft 365 (Office).jpg

20230129_154442.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

I'm just going to assume that so long as the tongue weight stays under 1450# as shown by using scales then I'm good to go.

 

A WDH will transfer some tongue weight to the axles on the truck and the trailer, and it will show on the scales. But the amount of weight transferred will depend on the WDH and on how well it was installed. I guess GM doesn't want to give blanket numbers like other manufacturers. But they could state it like I did above so people don't get confused like I did. Other vehicles I've owned stated dead tongue weights and distributed tongue weights.

 

A 1-ton truck should be able to tow any conventional hitch trailer IMO.

  • Like 1
Posted

Remember the manual covers DRW trucks, which is why it mentions up to 20,000 lbs. For an SRW 3500, the maximum conventional trailer weight is 14,500, and max tongue weight is 1,450.
 

In my opinion there is no need to use a weight distributing hitch on a 3500hd SRW at all.  The hitch tongue weight limit is 1450 for an SRW, and the payload of the truck is typically about 4000 lbs.  

 

For a 10,000 lbs trailer as an example:  Without a wdh, with 1000 lbs on the hitch about 4 feet behind the rear axle, you are putting about 1200 lbs on the rear axle and taking about 200 lbs off the front axle, are fairly close to an ideal 50/50 front/rear weight distribution, and haven’t even “leveled” the truck yet even if you carry another 600 lbs in the bed. 
 

A big benefit of not using a wdh is you are less likely to overload and fail your trailer frame going over dips, driveways, or sudden transitions to a steep incline.  
 

Every pound you pull on the WDH chains is reacted by the ball, and significant additional bending load is added on the trailer A-frame at the front of the trailer due to the torque from the wdh. That is where you will sometimes see frames bend or break. 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted

But it makes no sense to limit the tongue weight to 1450#s. Dual wheels or not, it's the same frame. The tires, wheels, axles and suspension on a SRW are more than capable of holding more than 1450#s or else the payload would have to be less. Weight is weight, no matter where it comes from. The class V hitch itself is good for 2000#+. It's the exact same hitch and frame on SRW, DRW, Gassers and Diesels. DRW are needed to support the tongue weights of heavy 5th wheel and gooseneck trailers, which can get much heavier. Chrysler and Ford tongue weights are much higher for their 1-ton trucks (1800#-2700# on class V hitches SRW).

GM also does not have the tongue weights listed anywhere I can find other than a sticker on the truck (Chrysler and Ford is no problem). This is complete BS since a 1-ton truck should be able to tow every conventional trailer available. People buy the truck expecting to tow something since the trailer weight is well within limits and then find out the tongue weight limit is pathetic. There are conventional toy haulers out there with a dry tongue weight of 1600#s. I know people whom have a conventional toy hauler with a 1900# wet tongue weight.

Also, on some trailers having 10% of the weight on the tongue is not enough. It's fairly common to need 12%-13% for a smooth ride. That reduces the towing capacity down to around 11,000#s instead of 14,500#s.

I don't want to use a WDH, but I'm going to use this truck for the reason I bought it.

Posted
13 hours ago, Another JR said:

A big benefit of not using a wdh is you are less likely to overload and fail your trailer frame going over dips, driveways, or sudden transitions to a steep incline.  
 

Every pound you pull on the WDH chains is reacted by the ball, and significant additional bending load is added on the trailer A-frame at the front of the trailer due to the torque from the wdh. That is where you will sometimes see frames bend or break. 

For me this is where things start to get into a gray area in my mind.  You are absolutely correct of a WDH putting more stress on the trailer frame.  I use one with our camper but it's a WDH with sway control bars, not the chains.  I haven't tried towing our camper which has 1k tongue weight and another 7k on the axles without it.  I might just try it out because I've read horror stories of the front frame on campers bending and cracking due to the use of a WDH.

Posted

I’m only familiar with some of the wdh and antisway systems out there, so I don’t know exactly what you are describing. Maybe a photo or product name?  I’m just curious to learn more. Thanks. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Another JR said:

I’m only familiar with some of the wdh and antisway systems out there, so I don’t know exactly what you are describing. Maybe a photo or product name?  I’m just curious to learn more. Thanks. 

This is the one we use.  https://www.etrailer.com/Weight-Distribution-Hitch/Fastway/FA92-00-1000.html

 

But I'm still curious as to how our camper would tow without using it.  I bought a fastway 12k hitch the other day.  I think I'll try just using that on our next outing to see if the WDH really makes a difference.

Posted

Here’s something interesting.  My 2500 is rating for a heavier gooseneck trailer and high hitch weight on a gooseneck that the door sticker posted above.  Bumper trailer rating is the same.  
 

 

6AD234D1-8FA0-4E0C-B260-5C056F5B4BF5.jpeg

Posted
5 minutes ago, Harv3589 said:

Here’s something interesting.  My 2500 is rating for a heavier gooseneck trailer and high hitch weight on a gooseneck that the door sticker posted above.  Bumper trailer rating is the same.  
 

 

6AD234D1-8FA0-4E0C-B260-5C056F5B4BF5.jpeg

That is correct.  The towing limits and tongue weights are higher using a 5th wheel.  Here's my sticker, same as yours. 

20220901_185009.jpg

Posted
Just now, Harv3589 said:

I just thought it was interesting that my 2500 had a higher gooseneck capacity than a 3500

I didn't catch that part.  That is interesting and somewhat confusing.

Posted

It’s because the limiting factor in the case of the gooseneck is the 24,000 GCWR. The 3500 weighs a little more, so it comes off the trailer weight. 

  • Like 2
Posted

Sorry if I came off a bit abrasive. I was a little upset when I was posting last night. I meant no offense to anyone here.

 

This is one of the toy haulers I am considering. As you can see the dry weight is way under my towing capacity, but the tongue weight is really close to my limit. This is the shorter one of the bunch. The longest one has a 1600# dry tongue weight. I do not like being so close to my limits when the trailer is dry.

 

Now, with toy haulers the "toy" gets loaded in the rear and that will reduce some of the tongue weight. How much depends on how much weight gets added to the rear. But there are variables which will constantly change as well. Such as this trailer has a 100 gallon water tank. Whether it is full or empty is going to change the tongue weight. If that water is in the black and grey tanks it is going to change the tongue weights. The trailer has a 40 gallon fuel tank too. How much weight is stored in the front storage area, as well as other stuff stored in all areas of the trailer is going to change tongue weights. The list goes on.

 

The point is, there are times when it's entirely possible to be a few hundred pounds lighter or heavier than the dry tongue weight. I plan to adjust rear weight as needed to keep my tongue weight in spec.

 

However, what if I wanted the 29TRX? It's dry weight is also under 10k#s. That's well within my towing capacity. But the dry hitch weight is 1600#s. So, while I could add my toy to the rear and probably get the tongue weight under 1450#s, I couldn't ever tow the trailer dry without being over the limit. Hence my anger. I would like the larger trailer, but It's too tongue heavy...

 

Screenshot_20230220_171107_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20230220_171123_Chrome.jpg

Posted
6 minutes ago, Dr1ft3r said:

Sorry if I came off a bit abrasive. I was a little upset when I was posting last night. I meant no offense to anyone here.

 

This is one of the toy haulers I am considering. As you can see the dry weight is way under my towing capacity, but the tongue weight is really close to my limit. This is the shorter one of the bunch. The longest one has a 1600# dry tongue weight. I do not like being so close to my limits when the trailer is dry.

 

Now, with toy haulers the "toy" gets loaded in the rear and that will reduce some of the tongue weight. How much depends on how much weight gets added to the rear. But there are variables which will constantly change as well. Such as this trailer has a 100 gallon water tank. Whether it is full or empty is going to change the tongue weight. If that water is in the black and grey tanks it is going to change the tongue weights. The trailer has a 40 gallon fuel tank too. How much weight is stored in the front storage area, as well as other stuff stored in all areas of the trailer is going to change tongue weights. The list goes on.

 

The point is, there are times when it's entirely possible to be a few hundred pounds lighter or heavier than the dry tongue weight. I plan to adjust rear weight as needed to keep my tongue weight in spec.

 

However, what if I wanted the 29TRX? It's dry weight is also under 10k#s. That's well within my towing capacity. But the dry hitch weight is 1600#s. So, while I could add my toy to the rear and probably get the tongue weight under 1450#s, I couldn't ever tow the trailer dry without being over the limit. Hence my anger. I would like the larger trailer, but It's too tongue heavy...

 

Screenshot_20230220_171107_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20230220_171123_Chrome.jpg

I commend you for doing your research on the weights.  So many times people are out there saying...oh yeah, my ford escape tows 12k pounds no problem....lol....but seriously I do commend you for trying to figure out the weights to stay within the ratings of your truck.  That makes you a safe guy!!  I love that!!

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have a 2018 Silverado Custom with 156k on the odometer. In the last month I've replaced the plugs, wires and the driver side engine mount. My wife just returned from a trip of about 1500 miles and told me the brakes are making a grinding noise when applied. I drove it and looked it over and this is what I found with the driver's side rear rotor.   I'm going to order new pads and check about having the rotor resurfaced. Hopefully this is easier than the last 2 jobs.   Peace  
    • Any update if the new valve cover help with the oil consumption?  I have a 2014 GMC sierra and my truck is consuming a lot of oil so I’m wondering if replacing the driver side valve cover will stop some of the oil consumption. Thanks 
    • I bought belts and pulleys for my '20 L5P at Rock Auto a couple years ago. I have used them for many years, and almost always save significant money, especially when I buy maintenance stuff ahead of time.   They carry many OEM parts, which is all I use unless an aftermarket is shown to be same/superior, or if it is an insignificant part or unavailable OEM part anywhere else. RA is usually lower priced, often by a bunch, but parts are sometimes unavailable or out of stock, and I do shop around and sometimes find better prices at other sites.   Be aware that you pay shipping, and if you buy multiple items and they are coming from different warehouses, the shipping can kill the advantage. Planning ahead is best if possible.   If you have a transmission service in the near future, check out their OEM (AC Delco ULV) fluid, usually MUCH less than anywhere else.
    • New member here, very long time occasional guest. Saw this thread, thought it would be a good time to contribute someting. It is only my experience and not a claim that everyone will have the same.   I bought my '20 3500 L5P new and have put 99.9% (literally) of it's current ~400k miles on it myself, with over 50% of that towing loads between 4k to 15k, and to me this truck has been nothing short of amazing. For the first 235k I had zero issues, and from there until 321k I replaced a NOx sensor, two failing glow plugs, and three of the notorious injector connectors. I believe this truck is in part, a testament to good luck, but also good care and following a decent maintenance schedule (I also keep meticulous records.) As a result, it looks as good as a well cared for 70k rig, up and down, inside and out.   At some point before that 321k mile mark I began to get a little spooked about the 10L1000, especially the valve body. Word of mouth about potential issues prompted me to jump on the net to sift through all the noise and determine what all the fuss was about. I routinely take long trips, coast-to-coast and points in between, so roadside breakdowns can be '...a thousand miles from nowhere' and a bit of a challenge, and though I had no issues, my guard was up and activated.   And then I stumbled across a chance to salvage some parts off a new 2025 that had been wrecked in transport. I grabbed a few wear items (alternator, pulleys, etc.) and on a whim asked what the ten speeder would cost me. It was cheap...really cheap. I knew some changes had been made in the '24+ version 10L and were supposedly not compatible, but I called service/parts at my local Chevy dealer and asked why and they didn't know. A call to a well known aftermarket transmission outfit revealed it was very likely it would be fine, but to them not 100% sure.   Because it was cheap (really cheap) and I was spooked, I took the chance. Had it installed by a local shop and it worked like a champ, shifted just like the original. At it's first service at 37k, I had the shop put in a Next Gen valve body kit, which after some initial hiccups and rough shifts, smoothed out though with somewhat firmer shifting.   All that said, I have a very serious concern about my newer transmission as just two weeks ago it suddenly began to exhibit a strong reluctance to engage forward or reverse. It was a bit past due anyway so I took it in for service. The reason it was sticking was due to 'glitter' in the fluid clogging the filter...not good folks, often indicates a converter giving out. We ended up going ahead with the new filter and fluid, first to see if it would move and shift, and then if so buy me a little time. It did, and I've driven it over a thousand miles and it is shifting smooth, no noises or slipping. Regardless, it looks like a third gearbox is in my future so I can resume taking long trips with some confidence. In the very short term, my curiosity will have me examining the fluid to check how much glitter has reappeared.   An earlier poster had alleged, in the context of 10L100 failures, that it is another example of how we seasoned citizens somehow descend into hysteria, lose control of our senses, and react irrationally after brief encounters with the idiocy of the internet infosphere. Let me say (and I have used and abused said internet since it's infancy) there is no segment of the populace that has a corner on over-reaction to digital garbage. Just as my offering of experience in this arena is purely anecdotal and should not be considered gospel or all-encompassing, I believe it is still worthwhile information to consider, along with other relevant anecdotal experiences about things like complex transmissions, especially when balanced with other sources.   So to answer the original question, yes I got high miles out of my first 10L, trouble free for 321,000. Now I really wonder how much longer it would have went. Did I 'overreact' to the internet ghouls by replacing a 'good' one with a 'bad' one? Maybe. Who knows, the thing might have taken a puke a 100 miles later. So I'll just fix it again, then move on and start thinking about all the other stuff that will eventually wear out. It still has the original brakes (they're at ~60%), original injectors/pump, turbo, water pump, etc....pretty much original everything. Knock on wood.
    • At peak temperature.  They get to cool down and warm up more, especially those with the external cooler.  I have three GMT900s and one of them has over 225K on its original transmission.  Fluid gets changed about every 36K miles, all of it.     It's not the bean counters, it was the government.  They had to meet CAFE standards and other government requirements.   To get around that, we tune them and modify them to our liking.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...