Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Pic of shifter and infotainment center. I’m 6’ 2” and the screen is not blocked by the shifter with my seat set up for me.
 

 

3832FFB7-039A-40CA-A229-E9EE2266ADE5.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted
21 hours ago, BuckWallace said:

Looks tight! How much room you got in the front?

About 4' in front, but I have my toolbox there.

Posted
11 hours ago, Pryme said:

Dang that’s closer than mine is to the garage door. Is that a deluxe 30” blower??looks identical to my Ariens

Yes, its an Ariens

  • Like 1
Posted
16 hours ago, rjgvt said:

2024 AT4 HD, ordered Oct 5th and brought it home today. Already dirty on the ride home, winter in VT!

 

GM running boards and splash guards.

 

Adjusted air pressures to 60psi for all. Onstar shows orange for the rears but no TPMS error yet. If it does, I’ll change the placard pressures if the truck allows it with my Autel TS508. 
 

Barely fits in the garage, can’t open the tailgate. A lot longer than my 2018 Sierra 1500 SLE Double Cab.

 

ARE cap gets put on next Friday.

 

381DEB4E-35E8-41CA-A566-204E9D0CE773.jpeg

Did it come with the KO2s?

Posted

First post here,  I have a 2024 3500 HC Dually on order,  been at Order Status 1100 since 12/4....  The order form has it as a sold order and priority 1.   I'm like a kid at Christmas,  how much longer???   I'm not getting clear answers from the dealer.  

Posted
11 minutes ago, PSM450 - 831 said:

First post here,  I have a 2024 3500 HC Dually on order,  been at Order Status 1100 since 12/4....  The order form has it as a sold order and priority 1.   I'm like a kid at Christmas,  how much longer???   I'm not getting clear answers from the dealer.  

I’ve only ordered two vehicles in my life both my wife drove as daily, both were put up as an investment. One we still have. The first a 94 impala ss I read about in Hot Rod magazine. My local dealer didn’t believe me when I went in to order, they hadn’t been informed. That took about 6 months. We kept it 8 years. Traded for a new 6 cylinder Camaro for my son to go to college. Even trade. The second 2001 Acura Intagra Type R. That took a year. We still have it. It drives me crazy the waiting. I wouldn’t do it for a regular vehicle. I make better deals off the lot. 

Posted
23 hours ago, 453030 said:

Congrats!  Probably just the scale of the photo, but that garage door looks tiny.  Good thing you did not get the ZR2, I don't think it would clear!

Yeah, those 9' wide doors are tight with those mirrors. Gotta pay attention going in and out of those small doors!

Posted
2 hours ago, TripleBGM said:

Did it come with the KO2s?


Truck came with BF Goodrich KO3’s. They have the 3 peak symbol for snow and will get through winter with them. I had Nokian Hakkapeliitta LT3’s on my  1500 and will get another set of wheels and Nokians for the AT4 HD for next winter. 

  • Like 2
Posted
On 1/19/2024 at 8:03 AM, KARNUT said:

I’ve only ordered two vehicles in my life both my wife drove as daily, both were put up as an investment. One we still have. The first a 94 impala ss I read about in Hot Rod magazine. My local dealer didn’t believe me when I went in to order, they hadn’t been informed. That took about 6 months. We kept it 8 years. Traded for a new 6 cylinder Camaro for my son to go to college. Even trade. The second 2001 Acura Intagra Type R. That took a year. We still have it. It drives me crazy the waiting. I wouldn’t do it for a regular vehicle. I make better deals off the lot. 

I've heard this story fifty times .

Has nothing to do with the guys question. 

Idiot.

  • Like 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, dieselfan1 said:

I've heard this story fifty times .

Has nothing to do with the guys question. 

Idiot.

You really need to get a life. You must really be a miserable SOB. 

Posted

My first post to this forum.  I have looked back through this thread and am wondering what others got in the way of a build sheet when they walked away from the initial order meeting with the dealer.

I sat down with the salesman at my dealer in early November and ordered at GMC 2500HD AT4X.  With the salesman we spec'd it out with the exact options I wanted on the same build system you see when you go to the GMC website.  He printed everything out and I reviewed everything to confirm it was correct.  He told me that the sales manager, who wasn't there that day, would put the order into the actual ordering system.  I kept contacting him wanted to get a specific build sheet from the "real" ordering system so that I could see a list of RPO/LPO codes and confirm that everything was correct. He kept telling me that he did not have one yet.  On December 20th I got a generic email from GMC saying that the order was placed and gave me an order number.  I asked the dealer again to see a build sheet or order sheet showing the RPO/LPO codes so I could confirm the options were correct.  Got the same answer, we don't have that yet.  Finally managed to get a copy of the order from them, week before last.  It was printed out of their Vehicle Locator system.  And sure enough the order was incorrect.  So now the dealer is telling me they have no way to contact GM and get the order corrected, in fact they can't even cancel the order even though it hasn't been built yet and we don't even have a build date. Ironically, I got another generic email from GMC telling me that the order is still in process.  All of this seems very odd.  Dealer has been apologetic, isn't trying to force the truck on me.  They are trying a few more avenues of contact this week but it looks like I am going to have to start over with a new order and the dealer is going to have a $100k truck sitting on their lot in a small town.

Does this seem normal?  Is it normal to not get an actual "real" build sheet when you leave the order meeting?  Is it true that once the order has been accepted and an order number issued that nothing can be corrected and they order can't even be canceled?

TIA

Posted
53 minutes ago, Red Hawk said:

My first post to this forum.  I have looked back through this thread and am wondering what others got in the way of a build sheet when they walked away from the initial order meeting with the dealer.

I sat down with the salesman at my dealer in early November and ordered at GMC 2500HD AT4X.  With the salesman we spec'd it out with the exact options I wanted on the same build system you see when you go to the GMC website.  He printed everything out and I reviewed everything to confirm it was correct.  He told me that the sales manager, who wasn't there that day, would put the order into the actual ordering system.  I kept contacting him wanted to get a specific build sheet from the "real" ordering system so that I could see a list of RPO/LPO codes and confirm that everything was correct. He kept telling me that he did not have one yet.  On December 20th I got a generic email from GMC saying that the order was placed and gave me an order number.  I asked the dealer again to see a build sheet or order sheet showing the RPO/LPO codes so I could confirm the options were correct.  Got the same answer, we don't have that yet.  Finally managed to get a copy of the order from them, week before last.  It was printed out of their Vehicle Locator system.  And sure enough the order was incorrect.  So now the dealer is telling me they have no way to contact GM and get the order corrected, in fact they can't even cancel the order even though it hasn't been built yet and we don't even have a build date. Ironically, I got another generic email from GMC telling me that the order is still in process.  All of this seems very odd.  Dealer has been apologetic, isn't trying to force the truck on me.  They are trying a few more avenues of contact this week but it looks like I am going to have to start over with a new order and the dealer is going to have a $100k truck sitting on their lot in a small town.

Does this seem normal?  Is it normal to not get an actual "real" build sheet when you leave the order meeting?  Is it true that once the order has been accepted and an order number issued that nothing can be corrected and they order can't even be canceled?

TIA

Hi Red Hawk:

I'm new to all this and unfortunately can't say I have a firm understanding, but happy to share my experience. (Started on P.33 of this thread)

 

On October 2, 2023 I met with my small but reputable GMC dealer. I had already configured (built) the truck I wanted on GMC's website and was able to present a printout of the options / packages that I wanted. The dealer used that information to generate a "Deal Sheet" that listed the trucks configuration and the agreed price. It appears the "deal sheet" was generated internal to the dealer and was representative of the Window Sticker would be. I was required to check and initial each line item (option/package) on the deal sheet for accuracy, great idea in my mind. The deal sheet listed a specifically assigned "Deal #" & "Customer #". At that time I was informed clearly the dealer had no idea when my truck would be built.                            Fast forward .....

 

December 14th 2023 I got a call from my salesperson stating the factory had "picked up my order" (allocation assigned), however the 5th wheel / ball mount package was constrained, I hung up and drove to the dealer. While at the dealership the salesperson made a call to his GMC factory rep and told me he resolved the constraint. Also, I was told I could add a small option. The salesman presented me with a revised configuration that was generated on the corporate GM order Workbench system. The workbench order listed my newly assigned order number and "allocation group". I was once again required to check and initial each option/package line item for accuracy, again, good idea.

At that time no firm delivery date could be established, however a welcomed "wild ass guess" of about early March was offered. That estimate seems consistent with the what I am reading on this thread that it takes about 8-9 weeks after the factory picks up the order. Simply out of excitement I will likely reach out to my salesman for an update.

 

I hope this verbose response may offer some assistance, and maybe someone will chime in with additional information.

Posted
4 hours ago, Red Hawk said:

My first post to this forum.  I have looked back through this thread and am wondering what others got in the way of a build sheet when they walked away from the initial order meeting with the dealer.

I sat down with the salesman at my dealer in early November and ordered at GMC 2500HD AT4X.  With the salesman we spec'd it out with the exact options I wanted on the same build system you see when you go to the GMC website.  He printed everything out and I reviewed everything to confirm it was correct.  He told me that the sales manager, who wasn't there that day, would put the order into the actual ordering system.  I kept contacting him wanted to get a specific build sheet from the "real" ordering system so that I could see a list of RPO/LPO codes and confirm that everything was correct. He kept telling me that he did not have one yet.  On December 20th I got a generic email from GMC saying that the order was placed and gave me an order number.  I asked the dealer again to see a build sheet or order sheet showing the RPO/LPO codes so I could confirm the options were correct.  Got the same answer, we don't have that yet.  Finally managed to get a copy of the order from them, week before last.  It was printed out of their Vehicle Locator system.  And sure enough the order was incorrect.  So now the dealer is telling me they have no way to contact GM and get the order corrected, in fact they can't even cancel the order even though it hasn't been built yet and we don't even have a build date. Ironically, I got another generic email from GMC telling me that the order is still in process.  All of this seems very odd.  Dealer has been apologetic, isn't trying to force the truck on me.  They are trying a few more avenues of contact this week but it looks like I am going to have to start over with a new order and the dealer is going to have a $100k truck sitting on their lot in a small town.

Does this seem normal?  Is it normal to not get an actual "real" build sheet when you leave the order meeting?  Is it true that once the order has been accepted and an order number issued that nothing can be corrected and they order can't even be canceled?

TIA

 

 

the key aspect in your situation is that you mention it's a small town dealer.  they've probably ordered more vehicles in the past 3 yrs than they have in the past 20 combined (then again maybe they really churn them out).  I contacted a dealer in a 100k+ population city we've bought several vehicles from and texted the salesman the exact truck we're interested in ordering - it was four options.  He left two off when they gave me a quote.

 

To answer your question, yes, a build sheet with an order number is available very soon if not within 15 mins after they place the order.  Sounds like you did everything you could and possibly know more about ordering than the salesman.   The only thing I'd have done is go by the dealership and talk to the person that actually placed the order.  Small town dealers the sales manager probably wear 10 hats - doesn't mean they can't be knowledgeable about everything they deal with...but fifteen minutes on a forum and I knew more about GM's ordering steps/allocations/constraints/order numbers than almost every salesman I spoke with

 

there used to be users online that could take the order number you received on 12/20 and then give you your build sheet.  guess dealers started pitching a fit because buyers now knew when something was screwed up before the vehicle arrived.  GM put a stop to the online assistance from other dealers that weren't the selling dealer - think employees can still do it, but GM must have some harsh penalties if they get caught because it pretty much stopped all of a sudden a year or so ago

 

Hope they are giving you a heckuva deal.  There's a point when it's easier to go elsewhere (understand small town politics may play a part though)

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 473 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...