Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
43 minutes ago, maronha said:

 I guess if I went with 285 they wouldn’t stick out? I can live with just a slight poke. Hell maybe I will get some fender flares at some point. How far out do they stick out about an inch?

I think it’s less. I looked for a picture but didn’t see any I’ll get one for you in a day or so. My truck is currently getting some cosmetic repairs and new bumper installed so I’m in our 2500hd. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, 5RWill said:

I think it’s less. I looked for a picture but didn’t see any I’ll get one for you in a day or so. My truck is currently getting some cosmetic repairs and new bumper installed so I’m in our 2500hd. 

Sounds good. I think I’m just going to go with the 295 and call it day. I start looking into things and I just rack my brain to no end.  

Posted

I have the Eibach Pro Truck Stage 1 kit set at 2-1/2” of lift. The tires are 285/65/18 on 18x9 wheels with +12mm offset. The edge of the tread sits flush to the tops of the fenderwells. A 295 on a 0 offset would stick out another 17mm or roughly 3/4”. 
 

My next tires will probably be 295/70/18 

IMG_9458.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, HoosierZ said:

I have the Eibach Pro Truck Stage 1 kit set at 2-1/2” of lift. The tires are 285/65/18 on 18x9 wheels with +12mm offset. The edge of the tread sits flush to the tops of the fenderwells. A 295 on a 0 offset would stick out another 17mm or roughly 3/4”. 
 

My next tires will probably be 295/70/18 

IMG_9458.jpeg

Looks great did you have to install a rear block? 

Posted

Thanks. 
I replaced the stock rear blocks with 2” blocks. It has 1-1/4” of rake measuring from the ground to the tops of the fenderwells. 

IMG_1437.jpeg

Posted
8 hours ago, HoosierZ said:

I have the Eibach Pro Truck Stage 1 kit set at 2-1/2” of lift. The tires are 285/65/18 on 18x9 wheels with +12mm offset. The edge of the tread sits flush to the tops of the fenderwells. A 295 on a 0 offset would stick out another 17mm or roughly 3/4”. 
 

My next tires will probably be 295/70/18 

IMG_9458.jpeg

 

Great looking set up! I like that front bumper on your truck. Is that the stock set up for the 2016 Z71?  Earlier today I ordered up the Hankook's in 295, so no turning back now.

 

Question do you know how far your front sits from ground to the fender well? After making adjustments on my front coilover my front is sitting at 40'' from ground to fender. My rear sits at 38.25''. Thats with my worn out tires I should say. So, to get level I need to add another 2'' to the rear. What size of block do I need to get level? How big are the stock block on our trucks?

Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, maronha said:

 

Great looking set up! I like that front bumper on your truck. Is that the stock set up for the 2016 Z71?  Earlier today I ordered up the Hankook's in 295, so no turning back now.

 

Question do you know how far your front sits from ground to the fender well? After making adjustments on my front coilover my front is sitting at 40'' from ground to fender. My rear sits at 38.25''. Thats with my worn out tires I should say. So, to get level I need to add another 2'' to the rear. What size of block do I need to get level? How big are the stock block on our trucks?

 The front bumper had the plastic pieces removed and I made a custom skid plate to fill the center. I also replaced the flimsy plastic wanna-be skid plate/ splash shield with the aluminum GM skid plates. 
 

My front measures 39-1/2” to the fenderwell with my nearly worn out tires that measure 32”. The rear fenderwell measures 40-3/4”. 
The stock lift blocks measure 1-3/16”. 

IMG_9478.jpeg

IMG_8784.jpeg

Edited by HoosierZ
Posted
16 minutes ago, HoosierZ said:

 The front bumper had the plastic pieces removed and I made a custom skid plate to fill the center. I also replaced the flimsy plastic wanna-be skid plate/ splash shield with the aluminum GM skid plates. 
 

My front measures 39-1/2” to the fenderwell with my nearly worn out tires that measure 32”. The rear fenderwell measures 40-3/4”. 
The stock lift blocks measure 1-3/16”. 

IMG_9478.jpeg

IMG_8784.jpeg

 

That is excellent work on that skid plate! Thanks for that other info. I will have to measure my rear blocks and see if they are the same. I am going to assume I will need to 3-inch block to get my rear level.

Posted
23 hours ago, HoosierZ said:

Thanks. 
I replaced the stock rear blocks with 2” blocks. It has 1-1/4” of rake measuring from the ground to the tops of the fenderwells. 

 

Awesome, did you adjust the eibach's at all? Just ordered the pro-truck 2R suspension. Is it hard to install a rear block? I'm going to install the coilovers myself, but wasn't sure about the rear. I have bilsteins at 1.85" that pretty much leveled my truck. 

Posted
2 hours ago, 5RWill said:

Awesome, did you adjust the eibach's at all? Just ordered the pro-truck 2R suspension. Is it hard to install a rear block? I'm going to install the coilovers myself, but wasn't sure about the rear. I have bilsteins at 1.85" that pretty much leveled my truck. 

Mine are set at the lowest setting at 2.5”.  The Stage 1 kit consists of their shocks with multiple snap ring grooves like the Bilsteins to adjust the lift height. At their lowest setting with the stock springs, the ride height is stock. With the springs included in the Pro Truck Stage 1 lift, the lowest setting is 2.5”  of lift and the 2nd groove is 3.2”. They don’t recommend using the 3rd or 4th groove. 

Rear blocks are easy to install. Do one side at a time to keep the axle from getting away from you and disconnect the shocks to allow the axle do drop away from the springs. 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, HoosierZ said:

Mine are set at the lowest setting at 2.5”.  The Stage 1 kit consists of their shocks with multiple snap ring grooves like the Bilsteins to adjust the lift height. At their lowest setting with the stock springs, the ride height is stock. With the springs included in the Pro Truck Stage 1 lift, the lowest setting is 2.5”  of lift and the 2nd groove is 3.2”. They don’t recommend using the 3rd or 4th groove. 

Rear blocks are easy to install. Do one side at a time to keep the axle from getting away from you and disconnect the shocks to allow the axle do drop away from the springs. 

 

Gotcha I'll have to see what the coilovers do when I install them out of the box then adjust from there. 

Posted
On 11/19/2023 at 7:35 AM, HoosierZ said:

I have the Eibach Pro Truck Stage 1 kit set at 2-1/2” of lift. The tires are 285/65/18 on 18x9 wheels with +12mm offset. The edge of the tread sits flush to the tops of the fenderwells. A 295 on a 0 offset would stick out another 17mm or roughly 3/4”. 
 

My next tires will probably be 295/70/18 

IMG_9458.jpeg

 

Hey I really like the look of your truck. 

 

How is the ride? Like a brick, plush, better then the other lift struts that always get recommended? 

 

I'm looking for something that will ride smooth.

 

Thanks

Posted (edited)

Need to order new TPMS for the new wheels. I know they are 315mhz. Anyone have the correct part number? When I look up on GM pats website I get this number GM 84413350. That doesn't seem to line up with all the numbers when I search other sites like tpms.com. I reached out to them to make sure I order the correct ones.

 

Edited by maronha
Posted
34 minutes ago, maronha said:

Need to order new TPMS for the new wheels. I know they are 315mhz. Anyone have the correct part number? When I look up on GM pats website I get this number GM 84413350. That doesn't seem to line up with all the numbers when I search other sites like tpms.com. I reached out to them to make sure I order the correct ones.

 

I have a friend that works at the chevy parts department.  I gave him my VIN and he gave me the correct part number for my TPMS.  I then found them on eBay for $40 for all 4.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Looks tight. Not a lot of working room. Hows yous knuckles?
    • Spot on. The government makes ridiculous mandates, and this causes manufacturers to jump through hoops for every TENTH of a MPG. Main reason quality is in the toilet and prices are in the stratosphere.   The gov't tightened the MPG requirements so much 5 years ago that the only way manufacturers could meet these absolutely ridiculous numbers was to go all EV. Hence the push.     Nobody hates good MPG, Atlas - nobody is "whining". Your side has that trait all locked up. What a stupid argument attempt!   What I particularly hate is the government meddling in the free market system. Had this system been allowed to work as designed and intended by our Founders, cars and trucks would be hitting numbers that would blow our minds, all while costing 30% LESS. Not only that, but engines could probably hit 150k miles again without needing major internal surgery.   My forty year old Ford 302 has 312k on it. Wonder what changed?🤔
    • The BORA 3/8" spacers arrived yesterday along with the extended lug nuts. I got the front wheels changed out today, but was overheated and covered in sweat so bad, I figured getting both front wheels done was a win, and took a cool shower. Hopefully, I'll go out tomorrow morning before it gets into the 80+ temps and do the backs. After getting the first wheel snugged up, I backed out one of the lug nuts then hand turned to count threads. I believe I stopped counting around 12-13, so I think I'm good there.    
    • My fullsize truck is averaging over 26mpg so I'm pretty happy with the increased fuel economy targets. When I had my gas Silverado (2020 5.3) it was averaging 21. Again, for a fullsize truck, that's very different from the 12-15 these things used to get 30 years ago.   Whine all you want, increased MPG is a good thing.
    • That is a fair point, and I think an OBD-first proof is probably the right next step. I agree that the value is not the hardware box by itself. The marketable part would be the software: always-on capture, baseline learning, event reduction, system-specific reports, and alerts. Also agreed that if an OBD device is always plugged in and has local storage, it should not miss the event in the same way that a scanner plugged in after the fact would. The only thing I would not want to assume yet is that an ELM327-class device gives all the late-GM data needed at the rate needed. Standard OBD live data, DTCs, freeze frame, Mode 6, VIN, and calibration information are definitely the right starting point. GDS2 also proves that a lot of useful ECM data can be viewed through the DLC without needing a DTC first. The question I need to test is whether the data needed for a useful GM V8 event report is actually available through the DLC, and at a useful sample rate: - misfire counts / roughness by cylinder - AFM/DFM state - oil pressure and oil temperature - fuel trims - voltage / reset context - U-codes and communication events - calibration / software information - whether these are standard PIDs, enhanced DIDs, Mode 6 data, GDS2-only data, or not available So I think the right benchmark is: 1. Build the OBD-only version first. 2. Keep it plugged in and logging locally. 3. Compare it against GDS2 / freeze frame / HP Tuners or another higher-end logger. 4. Measure which parameters are available and at what update rate. 5. Only justify ECM-side hardware if it captures useful evidence the OBD version cannot. So you may be right: the consumer product might simply be an always-plugged-in OBD event recorder with much better reporting. A question for you: when you say ELM327 devices can already deliver all the data needed, do you mean generic OBD Mode 01 data only, or GM enhanced data as well? For a useful GM V8 report, would generic OBD data be enough, or would you expect the tool to include enhanced items like misfire by cylinder, AFM/DFM state, oil pressure/oil temp, U-codes, and calibration information?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...