Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Some people love their vehicles. My wife says unless I can find a low mileage replica. A new engine, transmission or paint job is going to happen with her car if necessary. It’s a high mileage cream puff worth about 6K. The new replacement is about 60K. So a 10K engine and transmission replacement, no problem. 

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, asilverblazer said:

As an example, Grumpy, If, someone hit your truck and caved in the driver's door to the point it won't open and close. Repair estimate in the 4-5K maybe as high as 10K range. What would your course of action be? 

 

 

Fix it. :) 

 

Cost tells me what someone else want's. Worth is what others will pay. I don't pay much attention to worth. Worth retail? Wholesale? Private sale? Auction? Salvage? Insured total? 🤔 All are different but it's same vehicle. They exist to make someone other than me money on that trade/purchase. :idiot:Value? That is mine to determine.

 

Value is personal and her value to me is more than her worth to anyone else. Value isn't shared experience like the market is. Part of that value is in knowing that each time I put the key in her she will cost me money and that number is far lower than anything currently being build that would be a direct replacement if there were such a thing. There isn't. But that's just part of it. 

 

I bought that truck for about 50 cents on the dollar with thirteen hundred miles on it. It was headed to auction. "Nobody" wanted it. YUCK A 6!! RCSB with a 300 hp V6. My best current dealer offer was recently a few thousand more than it listed for. "Somebody" wants in now but not beat to crap and worn out. She's not for sale. But tell ya what. If she got bumped for a $10K, that cost and what I paid for it is still less than that offer. As impressive as that is....I don't care about that. 

 

She is reliable, economical in every sense of the word, sharp and fun to drive. What are they selling now that would tempt me? Nothing. They don't build this truck anymore. I can add another but not replace her. Priceless. 

 

And still, if it were compacted between to Semi trucks, unfixable. She already owns me nothing. I'm not out a penny. That sir is value. IMHO. 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
  • Like 1
Posted

Local Chev dealer sent me an e-mail with their featured vehicles. Every single one of them was an $80K+ p/u truck and sure enough when we drove by there this am on the way to an early am med procedure for my wife, same ones were lined up front row.  I would dehydrate so I wouldn't have to pee for a good while, buy a base Stingray C8, drive the snot out of it and have some fun before they had to use an engine hoist to get my old bones out. I'd rather take the depreciation on a "lightly used" life long dream than pay $80k for a gussied up utilitarian vehicle.

  • Haha 1
Posted

I let my family members buy them now days. They come over to let me drive them all proud. I thrash on them for a few minutes. Hand them back and happily drive my payment free old stuff. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
17 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Fix it. :) ...

 

...And still, if it were compacted between to Semi trucks, unfixable. She already owns me nothing.

Not faulting your opinion, the problem I have with 'fixing it' is that they are never the same afterwards. 

 

I factor repairability in there somewhere. Watching crash test videos, seeing the impact literally ripple from bumper to bumper, it'll never be 'straight' again. It becomes a sad story of "it was such a great truck..." I worked hard on it, took care, of it, maintained it well, it looked great... 

 

I suppose that's when you land at your last point. To me it's hard to walk away from a certain level of 'investment', whether it's taking time to fix, maintain and repair an otherwise 'unseemly' vehicle. I've had several experiences finding myself with vehicles that I put quite a bit into, time, repairs, maintenance, effort, improvements, $. For various reasons, they're no longer around, some I made money on, some I lost, some I broke even. Some I'm glad are gone, some I wish I'd kept, none of them I HAD to get rid of. Circumstances at the time just didn't warrant keeping them in the driveway. I've found that regardless, most of them aren't in my driveway much past 5 years. My favorite and best was around for about 15 years.

 

However, the current fleet, the Yukon my wife drives, and the Silverado look like they'll surpass the average, nothing new is compelling enough. 

 

The Yukon though is starting to show some age, door dings, fading plastics, more rattles, wear on the interior surfaces all cosmetic, but soon will follow drivetrain wear, wheel bearings, cv-boots/shafts, ball joints, tie-rods and bushings, many non-serviceable, 170k miles, 10 years old, close to the point where the maintenance tab is going to go up, marketable value is about to go off a cliff. To me, its end of life soon, the minor cosmetic issues will start becoming eyesores. Minor complaints will become major annoyances with no practical resolution. Finding interior rattles, nope. Recovering arm rests, new steering wheel cover, polishing or replacing plastics, fix all the door dings for a new one tomorrow. (Things a new one would be subject to, too.) Death by a thousand annoyances or one major item (a locked-up engine from poor maintenance :lol: ).

 

Just lease one. :D

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, asilverblazer said:

Not faulting your opinion, the problem I have with 'fixing it' is that they are never the same afterwards. 

 

There are a few situations where I walk away. Flood or fire damage and major hail damage. The afore mentioned trapped between two semi trucks and rolled into a ball of tin foil. Tornado and flipped on her top. :crackup:

 

But those are also salvage situations. Have an uncle that bought a 36 Ford with a 60 horse flathead that transplanted the motor/trans into numerous vehicles eventually logging a million on the power train. Valves were lapped about 300K miles. Eventually it ended up as a working display for the Anamosa School district's auto shop program. Finally laid to rest when he was. It was his first ride. 36 C cab. 

  • 1 month later...
Posted (edited)

I Wouldn't Know Where to Begin 

 

Oh I know where I would begin but I'm just one of over eight billion people on this rock. Eight billion versions of where the goal post is. How large it should be. How far to kick from. What ball is the right ball. Elevation. Age.....are you getting the point? It isn't about disagreeing with one individual. It's about agreeing only with one individual. One's self.

 

Agreement comes when multiple people hold the same point. THAT is the goal of an education. Building the Social Contract. That thing that allows us to all read this sentence. We've agreed on the alphabet and how to arrange those letters into words we agree upon whose meanings hold true for everyone entering into that contract. Those words arranged into a sentence form an idea and several sentences strung together in a paragraph convey an argument for or against or inform the reader of a state, condition or perhaps reveal a things nature. Paint a word picture. Make oneself known. 

 

This contract is not limited to words although they are often explained by words. Things like numbers and their usefulness. Physics, Chemistry, Medicine, Music, Art and so on. 

 

The frequency of middle C (C4) is 261.63 Hz is a first principle, not a suggestion. We build on that to make music we all can enjoy even if we all can not compose or play. You don't have to master it to make it enjoyable and useful. 

 

So why is the Beginning so difficult? Why is agreement so elusive?

 

Everyone "Signs" the contract (when receiving that education in obtaining it)  but fewer and fewer in this world have any intention of living by that contract. They find exploiting that contract more advantageous. Disruption. With intent. Without intent. In Ignorance. In your face. With a double dog dare you. With a hold my beer. In resistance to that contract and in spite how it looks on us. It permeates the very air we breath. 

 

In this way the contract is subject to advantage. Abide by it when it serves you, disregard it when it doesn't. Unpredictable and self-serving. Corrosive.....Toxic........

 

It says a lot about a persons character to disregard the contract, the truth, first principles. None of it good. 

 

:rant:

 

 

********************************************************

 

https://medicine.yale.edu/news-article/character-vs-personality-who-we-are-and-who-we-aspire-to-be/

 

Just an interesting article. 

 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
Posted

Disassembly may be Required!

 

Every blender makes claims but do  you ponder those claims? What was really said? Was it true?  Motive for saying it? What does in infer?  Is that inference true? 

 

Let's do one. 

 

Claim: Made from shear stable base oils. 

 

What was said: Base Oils are shear proof.

 

Was it true: Yes.  ALL base oils are Newtonian. 

 

Motive / Inference: To imply the fully formulated product is Shear Proof

 

Is the Inference true?: Most fully formulated multigrade oils contain Viscosity Modifiers or VM's, sometimes called VII or Viscosity Index Improvers. There are four types. One is in fact shear proof but it also has a bad effect on extreme cold flow and is restricted to use in specialty oils. A second has limited shear called a 0-5 SSI polymer. Meaning its shear is limited to a range of zero to five percent as reported by the ASTM D6278 Shear Stability Index test. A few high end oils, like Torco SR-5, use them and brag about it profusely. Actually all that use it point it out. The last two shear dramatically and are often marketed as a 'feature' of the product aiding the oil to meet fuel standard requirements of ever stricter rules. One shears more than 5% and the other up to 20%. As you make guess, cost is directly linked to shear down and as such the majority of oils use the cheapest organic polymers sold to make grade and pass stringent tests. 

 

PPD's or Pour Point Depressants also shear a bit, only a few percent and hide inside the 0-5 SSI capabilities. 

 

The blender knows he can not out engineer Stribeck. Physics is not a suggestion. But he can wordcraft the unsuspecting toward believing a false claims INFERENCE. This is LEGAL. It is COMMON, and it is EFFECTIVE. 

 

 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thrust bearing is a very small window.  But nice try.   Turbo oil filter?  Haven't seen any failures.  Change your oil more frequently.  Use a better oil than the factory oil.  
    • There is a p/n called out in the one PI that GM has.  Curt 57003 inline load adapter that is used for LED trailers that are having trouble with these newer trucks.  No cutting, no splicing, etc.  GM did update the lighting module around 2023 to better pick up trailers with LED lighting, but it still can happen.     Here's the link to the Curt site for it - 7-Way RV Blade LED Electrical Adapter (Not a Wiring Extension) SKU #57003 by CURT   The PI I am referencing - MC-10208985-9999.pdf   Its not just a GM deal either.  Newer Fords and Rams have this same problem.       In another PI, they recommend that the trailer has a Pollock brand 7 way on it as that is who makes the truck sides for the OEMs.  GM is also big on making sure the trailer is trouble free.  So no wiring issues, all lights are functional, better quality 7 way plug, etc.     The other PI I am referencing - MC-10178359-9999.pdf   The model year range is older but it is the current PI for 2014-2026.  It calls out the Pollock RV HD 7 way they recommend.  
    • That's part of the problem...the EGR has already been replaced, and I've already had the complete intake assembly removed, and the EGR passages were clear at that time. That leaves wiring, PCM, or another variable that I wasn't expecting. Best I can tell, it's not wiring or the PCM, so I'm grasping for straws.   The PCM uses the MAP reading to confirm the requisite loss of vacuum in the manifold when the EGR activates. Since that's vacuum related, it involves a lot of other systems which could play a role.   The overall diagnosis has to be considered too. The fuel lines in the intake had rubbed through and were dumping fuel into the intake, drowning the cylinders in fuel, and putting raw fuel into the sump and cat converter. The fuel system has been fixed but the complete path of damage may not be. If the cat was damaged and melted the internals, it could be partially obstructed and also playing into the EGR issue.   I'm retracing my steps; trying to go back to thinking thinking Horses not Zebras based on the clues I've been given. These engines aren't *that* complex.   Could it be, now that the truck is running well, that carbon and crud from being run with the fuel system in disarray is now dislodging and clogged my clean EGR passages where I can't see?  That's what the code is actually saying. The flow is restricted, dummy. Retrace step 1.   I may just need to remove the lower intake again. Before I do that I'm going to try removing the EGR and running the engine for a few seconds to see if it will blow anything lodged in the egr passages out through the open ports.     That's been helpful in the past. For the spider injector, there's no guarantee I'll get a working one. The spider I have seems fine now that the high pressure fuel line isn't making an early delivery via large hole. SO at least I'm not marooned and looking for one of those.   Row52 (dot com) is also a good one for watching for vehicles at local yards.  
    • Disassembly may be Required!   Every blender makes claims but do  you ponder those claims? What was really said? Was it true?  Motive for saying it? What does in infer?  Is that inference true?    Let's do one.    Claim: Made from shear stable base oils.    What was said: Base Oils are shear proof.   Was it true: Yes.  ALL base oils are Newtonian.    Motive / Inference: To imply the fully formulated product is Shear Proof.    Is the Inference true?: Most fully formulated multigrade oils contain Viscosity Modifiers or VM's, sometimes called VII or Viscosity Index Improvers. There are four types. One is in fact shear proof but it also has a bad effect on extreme cold flow and is restricted to use in specialty oils. A second has limited shear called a 0-5 SSI polymer. Meaning its shear is limited to a range of zero to five percent as reported by the ASTM D6278 Shear Stability Index test. A few high end oils, like Torco SR-5, use them and brag about it profusely. Actually all that use it point it out. The last two shear dramatically and are often marketed as a 'feature' of the product aiding the oil to meet fuel standard requirements of ever stricter rules. One shears more than 5% and the other up to 20%. As you make guess, cost is directly linked to shear down and as such the majority of oils use the cheapest organic polymers sold to make grade and pass stringent tests.    PPD's or Pour Point Depressants also shear a bit, only a few percent and hide inside the 0-5 SSI capabilities.    The blender knows he can not out engineer Stribeck. Physics is not a suggestion. But he can wordcraft the unsuspecting toward believing a false claims INFERENCE. This is LEGAL. It is COMMON, and it is EFFECTIVE.         
    • I don't recall ever dealing with one on an '06 and back. It may not even exist on that. I can't remember for sure.   Any kind of ice in or after the evaporator is normally due to low charge with both a clutch-cycling orifice tube system, and a TXV system.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...