Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Looking to trade my 22 Refresh Denali and see that SLT/LTZ loaded come in at $86K and Denali $93K High Country $90K (no ARC is likely price difference).

 

I see why elevations and the like are $3K-$4k less than SLT/LTZ but what does the Denali/HC give me for the next $4k-$6K????

 

The 22 Denali with 80,000km is co9ming back at $54K trade which seems low but I did get GM preferred when I bought it.

 

 

Is the preferred pricing form GM the best discount I am going to get in Ontario Canada? I see big discounts in the US threads????

 

 

 

Posted

When I ordered my '23, I wanted Max Trailering, which wasn't available on the Denali, plus HUD, which wasn't available on the SLT or lower, and I didn't want the spray-in bed liner, which was standard on the High Country.  So I went with an LTZ and am happy with that. 

  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, d15nonvtec824 said:

If you already have refresh model, then why trade in?  are you after a certain motor?

 

At 80,000km and 2 yrs old (even though 3 model yrs now) and yes looking to get into a 3.0 like I ordered but could not get during COVIS (waited 9 months for the dealer build I took to come in). Price will start to drop more now as 25s come out and mileage creeps out so seems to be the best time to flip.

Posted

I originally wanted a Denali to replace our 2017 Canyon Denali.  When shopping for the new truck my "must haves" were 3.0 liter diesel, Max Tow and Standard Bed - everything else was negotiable.  I wanted a few features available on the Denali like HUD and retractable side steps, but I couldn't get a Denali with Max Tow which led me to the SLT.  I was stuck on GMC mostly because I wanted to purchase again from Laura near St. Louis.  I also just liked the look of the GMCs better than the Chevys.  For those reasons I really didn't look at an LTZ or High Country, even though I could have gotten the retractable side steps with the LTZ and I think I could have gotten Max Tow and the side steps on a High Country.  Now 5 months and 6K miles in I am very happy with my decision.  My SLT has all the luxury features I wanted with the Premium Plus Package and nothing I really didn't want.  Buying at Laura worked out as I was able to get a great deal on price again.  I also was able to get the sunroof I wanted and the color (Volcanic Red) I wanted.  The retractable side steps would have been nice, but just something else I'd have to service and probably repair at some point.  We recently drove a Silverado LT rental while on vacation for the week and the lack of features compared to our Sierra SLT were very noticeable.  I really think from a price vs features standpoint the SLT and LTZ really hit the sweet spot.  Denali or AT4 and High Country are great and have more nice to have features but the cost of entry is really quite a bit more and I'm just not sure they'd have worth the extra cost to me.

  • Like 2
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 11/21/2024 at 11:37 AM, Port Tack Farm said:

I originally wanted a Denali to replace our 2017 Canyon Denali.  When shopping for the new truck my "must haves" were 3.0 liter diesel, Max Tow and Standard Bed - everything else was negotiable.  I wanted a few features available on the Denali like HUD and retractable side steps, but I couldn't get a Denali with Max Tow which led me to the SLT.  I was stuck on GMC mostly because I wanted to purchase again from Laura near St. Louis.  I also just liked the look of the GMCs better than the Chevys.  For those reasons I really didn't look at an LTZ or High Country, even though I could have gotten the retractable side steps with the LTZ and I think I could have gotten Max Tow and the side steps on a High Country.  Now 5 months and 6K miles in I am very happy with my decision.  My SLT has all the luxury features I wanted with the Premium Plus Package and nothing I really didn't want.  Buying at Laura worked out as I was able to get a great deal on price again.  I also was able to get the sunroof I wanted and the color (Volcanic Red) I wanted.  The retractable side steps would have been nice, but just something else I'd have to service and probably repair at some point.  We recently drove a Silverado LT rental while on vacation for the week and the lack of features compared to our Sierra SLT were very noticeable.  I really think from a price vs features standpoint the SLT and LTZ really hit the sweet spot.  Denali or AT4 and High Country are great and have more nice to have features but the cost of entry is really quite a bit more and I'm just not sure they'd have worth the extra cost to me.

Yeah I was thinking I wanted Max Tow as well but in the 3.0 babymax option I think gearing goes from 3.23 to a 3.42 so not a big change really for all I tow.....  Also the Denali I think adjusts suspension (shocks only I guess) to help trailering from the video I saw from TopTruck. Still that ARC being part of an almost $6K MSRP jump is tough when looking at the differences.....which am still doing.

 

Dealer was trying to tell me Denali keeps a couple % better resale value so with Denali keeping 75% means losing 25% of a $92K truck vs with SLT keeping 73% and losing 27% of an $86K truck - its a wash so they say and you drive a better truck???

Posted (edited)

2025 order guide

 

Max Tow (NHT) with 3.0 gets 3.73's

image.thumb.png.f2139b8f550563e9474f49060d4b41f7.png

 

Edited by redwngr
Posted (edited)

It depends on what options you want on the truck. 

 

Some stuff standard on Denali is optional on SLT (Adaptive cruise for example)

 

Some stuff optional on Denali is not available on SLT (HUD for example) --- so it's not possible to option and SLT to have all equipment available on a Denali.

 

Some stuff optional on Denali is standard on Denali Ultimate (supercruise, powersteps and sunroof are examples)

Some stuff optional on Denali Ultimate is not available on Denali (carbonpro box for example) 

 

And some stuff available on SLT and Denali is not available on Denali Ultimate -- standard box (6.5') for example.  

 

and so on....

 

 

I really like HUD (rpo UV6) but want 18's rather than 20's (and refuse 22's)

HUD won the argument and so have Denali instead of SLT.

I don't want a sunroof, refuse to run the shortbox and detest 22" wheels,  so the Denali Utimate out of consideration. 

 

Previous truck, the dealer any my wife convinced me to add a sunroof. In a weak moment I agreed.

It was rarely ever opened, and ti never stayed open for long.

 

When ordering this truck, dealer and I had a conversation about adding sunroof.

Sorta like the Denali/SLT discussion that @TJL72 had with his dealer.

Dealer says first question his 'buyers' ask is 'does it have a sunroof'.

I say 'and how much more do they pay for a sunroof'? 

Turns out it's less than the option cost... 

 

 

 

Edited by redwngr
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, TJL72 said:

Yeah I was thinking I wanted Max Tow as well but in the 3.0 babymax option I think gearing goes from 3.23 to a 3.42 so not a big change really for all I tow.....  

 

 

What do you tow and about how much does it weigh?

Edited by newdude
Posted
9 hours ago, newdude said:

 

 

What do you tow and about how much does it weigh?

Trailer  probably 2,500 lbs (7x22 snow w 5’ v- nose. 4 sleds another 2,500 or so which would be 5k-6k total weight of trailer?

Posted
10 hours ago, redwngr said:

2025 order guide

 

Max Tow (NHT) with 3.0 gets 3.73's

image.thumb.png.f2139b8f550563e9474f49060d4b41f7.png

 

Ok then - I guess I got it backwards!!  Seems steep for the diesel….. and I thought when i did the build that’s what it told me.  Guess I’m would rather use the X-31 package than the max tow. 

Posted
1 hour ago, TJL72 said:

Trailer  probably 2,500 lbs (7x22 snow w 5’ v- nose. 4 sleds another 2,500 or so which would be 5k-6k total weight of trailer?

Do you tow it with the '22 5.3?

I'd guess it has the 10 speed?

Does it struggle?

Is it max tow? 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I have a 2024 Denali Reserve Pkg 3.0L 4wd CC.  Did not want the Ultimate because Super Cruise is not supported in this area of the US and I drive mostly local 2-lane rural blacktop.  I ordered it but salesman (friend) entered it as a stock order so I would not have to put a deposit down.  GM was pushing allocations on them as they are only a GMC dealer now that GM pushed them to give up Buick or invest millions of $$ in EV infrastructure to sell <100 Buick's annually.  Got supplier pricing, roughly $10 off with incentives and GM card earnings and $500 veterans incentive.....Only towing I do is a 7x14 Aluma trailer hauling a 2022 RZR XP 1000, approx. 4,000 lbs +-  4 months from order acceptance to delivery.  I traded in a 2021 Denali 6.2L and got $43,000. A similar truck but an SLT would have been in the high 30's I was shown at the time Aug. '24.

2024 GMC Sierra Denali Window Stikcer.pdf

Edited by Z45
  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
On 12/2/2024 at 10:13 PM, redwngr said:

Do you tow it with the '22 5.3?

I'd guess it has the 10 speed?

Does it struggle?

Is it max tow? 

 

 

 

 

Yes I have towed with it a and the 5.3 few times - yes 10 Spd and no its not max tow -  it doesn't struggle as it has the numbers but eats fuel which is why I want the 3.0.

Edited by TJL72

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • No ETA is available for that engine at the moment in the GM system.   I would start at the dealer.  Try and talk to the parts manager or service manager and see if they can start a CX Connect case and get an ETA from GM on when engines may be available.  If they just check Parts Workbench and say "no eta", they aren't trying hard enough.  They need to do a CX Connect and chat with DPAC to find the ETA.      
    • I would have to read back to get a better picture in my mind of some of the other comments and what they were using for a driving scenario they based the fuel mileage off of. That is why the fuel mileage conversation is extremely difficult to make fair comparisons from. If I was to be living in town and only driving around town, light to light and some longer stretches that doesn't have a light every block, and the usual stop at a grocery store and the bank and so on and so forth, my fuel mileage even during the summer time would be so bad with my truck I don't even want to know how bad it would be !. Then add in winter time and idling to warm it up to clear the windows and driving through snowy streets etc, large heavy trucks with gas engines have NEVER been worth crap for fuel mileage and why some little pot licker of a car with wheelbarrow tires and a 1300 cc four cylinder non turbo engine was the ticket to using a mere fraction of the fuel over a full size pickup.    By the way my truck has the 34" tires as its a HC but not the BFG KO3 tires ( that was an option for my truck but the sales guy couldn't figure out what the tires actually were so that never got on the order until it was too late to change the truck order ). So what fuel mileage your getting actually sounds good for "town driving" and with my truck when I go to town the fuel mileage keeps increasing as I get closer to town because it takes quite a while to get the driveline oils warmed up ( and why it always shows better fuel mileage on the return trip from town because its already warmed up ) but once I am in town that fuel mileage average just keeps dropping the more I mess around town and then has to recover back to something reasonable again by the time I get home for an over all average.    I'd be curious what your sticker says for the factory weight of your truck, mine is close around that 7700 lb due to the options it has. But anyway the long and short is, vehicle weight, higher rolling resistance heavy tires and a hefty driveline and a relatively large gas engine make for crap fuel mileage in stop and go scenarios, all one can do is drive it easy off the line at each stop and as my dad had said over the years, drive like a raw egg is under your foot and that's the best one can do. Years back with a carbed engine and if the carb was getting a bit out of tune etc as would the ignition system, the fuel mileage on pickups with larger engines was just awful compared to what your getting. We pay the fuel price penalty for driving HD trucks over some little vehicle, that is the reality. 
    • We had two Toyota’s with that engine in the mid 80s. We had 50 gallon fuel tanks, a toolbox full of tools, an air compressor and assorted parts for our equipment. We beat those up and down pipeline ROWs until we started buying diesel trucks. Then they became parts runners and first vehicles for our teenagers first cars. Our shop Forman wrecked them both two years apart when we hired him out of high school as an apprentice. Good thing he’s an excellent mechanic. It took awhile before he could be called a good driver.
    • $4.26 85 oct 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...