Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 hours ago, asilverblazer said:

I KNOW I can get 250K miles using GM's recommendation, with oil consumption.

 

Pepper is at 185,000 and uses no oil and the AFM is working perfectly ignoring the OEM recommendations for OCI and oil spec.  

 

Yes, yes.... you'd be right....Question still hanging is; for how long. :dunno: I can't read the future, but I can read a rocker box and a compression gauge and at somewhere around 165K it looked new: 

 

Not a brag...A result.

 

image.thumb.jpeg.a5892e80aa9ca969595c572462de83b5.jpeg

 

 

 

 

  • 2 months later...
Posted

After watching the video, guy mentions oil life monitor. Waiting near 0% and having 7-10000 miles. Sometimes up to 12000. And then wonders why it uses so much oil.

Posted
1 hour ago, Service1956 said:

After watching the video, guy mentions oil life monitor. Waiting near 0% and having 7-10000 miles. Sometimes up to 12000. And then wonders why it uses so much oil.

Audi allows high drain intervals. Their engines are known to coke the piston top down from fuel. 
Engine oil had nothing to do with this failure. 
 

 

  • 1 month later...
Posted

big fan of lake speed jr.  0-20 oil is a joke, it's epa oil, thinnest possible oil to get most mpgs for their fleet mpg and reduce fines.  do we care about that.....?  NOPE.

 

i used napa 5w-30 because the viscosity holds better than the barely 40w supercar mobil 1 and has more molyb in it according to tests.  i'm at 7500.  took out the oem at 1000, put in 0w-20 napa at 1000-5000, now running 5w-30 and will probably stick with it. instantly went quiet with the 5w-30 for what it's worth.  i might try a 5w-40 if i can find a dexos version of it.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

My Grandaughter stopped by to visit with her 09 Mazda 3 my wife found. We bought it for 500$ with close to 150K miles on it. That was 2021. Her Chrysler 300 was approaching 300K miles on it. We were worried this seemed better. To date she needed minor AC work. At first it had a transmission leak that resolved on its own. She uses the same Valvoline quick lube I use. It’s never had transmission service. She’s put over 100K miles on it. I get more convinced that more than oil change intervals, even transmission service. It’s what you drive that makes more difference. I remember her calling me saying her steering was acting up on the Chrysler. I told her get a turkey paster and pull out the fluid it and put new in, that fix it. My niece has the twin to my Ridgeline only it a SUV. Once I started messing with Hondas I became familiar with their maintenance. I asked my brother if the timing belt was replaced on his daughter’s SUV. He got it done right away at 140. At 200K it’s never had transmission service. Recently spark plugs. My list is very small on vehicles I’ll buy. I rather have tough vehicles that handle abuse. And treat them to frequent service. Than have to do it for them to survive. 

Edited by KARNUT
Posted
16 hours ago, Snow White said:

big fan of lake speed jr.  0-20 oil is a joke, it's epa oil, thinnest possible oil to get most mpgs for their fleet mpg and reduce fines.  do we care about that.....?  NOPE.

 

i used napa 5w-30 because the viscosity holds better than the barely 40w supercar mobil 1 and has more molyb in it according to tests.  i'm at 7500.  took out the oem at 1000, put in 0w-20 napa at 1000-5000, now running 5w-30 and will probably stick with it. instantly went quiet with the 5w-30 for what it's worth.  i might try a 5w-40 if i can find a dexos version of it.

AMSOIL's European 5w-40 is dexos 2, I know it's a diesel rating but in the dexos line and it's listed for both gasoline and diesel applications.

 

https://www.amsoil.com/p/amsoil-5w-40-ms-100-synthetic-european-motor-oil-afl/?zo=521390

  • Thanks 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Black02Silverado said:

But what about an oil listed for both gas and diesel?  Such as this.  

 

https://www.amsoil.com/p/amsoil-5w-40-ms-100-synthetic-european-motor-oil-afl/?zo=521390

 

I rewatched the video. Seems pretty straight forward. 

 

This oil you referenced is rated for allot of uses and among them the API category CF which is diesel and also obsolete and has been since 2009. So kind of a non question question. Having a rating is less important than have the right one, correct? 

 

BTW, @Snow White,  Dexos 2 isn't a diesel rating. Dexos D is. Dexos 2 is a 3.5 HTHS minimum spec. Like AECA C3

 

As far as why there are oils with duel ratings.... yea, I don't read tea leaves. I don't like marketers. I like results and lab data. Don't think I'll be much use on this question. 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

I rewatched the video. Seems pretty straight forward. 

 

This oil you referenced is rated for allot of uses and among them the API category CF which is diesel and also obsolete and has been since 2009. So kind of a non question question. Having a rating is less important than have the right one, correct? 

 

BTW, @Snow White,  Dexos 2 isn't a diesel rating. Dexos D is. Dexos 2 is a 3.5 HTHS minimum spec. Like AECA C3

 

As far as why there are oils with duel ratings.... yea, I don't read tea leaves. I don't like marketers. I like results and lab data. Don't think I'll be much use on this question. 

 

dexos 2 was what GM stated to use in their diesel engines like when I had me diesel Cruze, but then changed the specification to dexos D.  dexos 2 is being phased out by 2026.

 

You might of been thinking of dexos gen2, which there is now a gen3.

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Black02Silverado said:

dexos 2 was what GM stated to use in their diesel engines like when I had me diesel Cruze, but then changed the specification to dexos D.  dexos 2 is being phased out by 2026.

 

You might of been thinking of dexos gen2, which there is now a gen3.

 

Likely correct

 

Everything has an expiration date. Mine is sooner than later. 

 

I posted the video more for what one can learn from the implications then what he actually said. There was allot of meat on those bones. 

  • Like 2
Posted

emailed lake he said not to change viscosity without UOA.  was looking at valvoline VR1 and valvoline advanced.  only the 20w-50 has the correct NOOACK value.  VR1 is not good for catalytic converters I read?  outside of boutique oil, the napa version of valvoline seems really good.  i have 2500 miles to go before my 5k change.  it'll take 2-3 drains to get all the 0w-20 napa out of there.

 

getting 19mpg with a range installed, 3.5" ready lift, 33x12.5R22 nittos... hard to argue with that.  not that i care much about the mpgs but it's notable for others.

  • Like 1
Posted

@Black02Silverado

 

https://360.lubrizol.com/Specifications/GM/GM-dexos2

 

I think the difference is going to be in service on this one. Diesel oil? Yes and No...light duty automotive diesel, not OTR and yes, it has a minimum 3.5 HTHS as I thought. The list of approved oils is silly short in both weights. Here's one of them

 

https://www.castrol.com/content/dam/castrol/master-site/en/global-ia/home/africa/documents/products/edge-5w30-c3-pds.pdf

 

This is exactly what it says on the data sheet. 

 

Application:

 

Castrol EDGE 5W-30 C3 is suitable for use in automotive gasoline and diesel vehicles where the manufacturer recommends: ACEA C3, API SN/CF 5W-30 Lubricant Castrol EDGE 5W-30 C3 is approved for use in vehicles from leading manufacturers, please refer to the product performance section and your owners handbook. *GM dexos2TM: supersedes GM-LL-B-025 and GM-LL-A-025 : GB2E0209082

 

There is that obsolete CF classification again. Yet Dexos 2 approved for diesel nonetheless. 

 

So yea, it has a diesel certification and No it isn't useful as a universal diesel oil. Don't put it in you Cat or CUMMINS. 

 

Basically this is a Euro Spec ACEA C3 oil that won't kill a Cruze. 

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

just drained my Napa 5w-30 and put on a new WIX.  Waiting for the lab kit, forgot to order it before i did the drain but the drain is more important than letting the oil sit in a cleaned out vitamin water bottle with a cap for 2 days LOL.  (i used soap and water and rinsed it excessively).

 

i'll post the results as usual.

this will be a 5K OCI.

  • Like 1
Posted

Just sent my 3000 mi. 5w30 sample out yesterday. 6700 miles on truck. High copper on 1`st 2 samples. 1`st one done at 500 miles. It does have the extra coolers as it has the NHT package. So, maybe the cooler is the cause of the high copper. We`ll see. 5.3L

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,716 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...