Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm moving forward with a new truck purchase in the next few weeks and struggling to decide which engine to go with. I live in CA and don't tow. Typically drive 20,000 per year. My typical commute is 35 miles each way with 90% country roads at 55 mph and freeway at 65 mph, a combo of the two. I do get up the mountains frequently so the extra torque from the 6.2 and 3.0 appease me. I do understand having the turbo will be helpful at elevation compare to a NA engine. 

 

I was initially all set on the 6.2 but with the recent notice from NHTSA, It's got me thinking twice. 

 

Never owned a diesel and don't feel overly confident I can feed it the proper/required diesel living in California. 

 

What would you all go with? Trim level wise going RST or LTZ. Deals seem to be better on the LTZ with the 3.0. 

Posted

I have a 3.0 and 16,000 miles later I am still amazed at the fuel efficiency over my 5.3 Avalanche I had previously.  I know gas prices are a different world on your side of the country but I ran a spreadsheet for almost 15,000 miles and came up with about 30% more cost efficient across all types of driving versus my Avalanche.  I see a roughly 50% increase in fuel economy so the 30% number takes into account the higher cost of diesel versus regular unleaded.  At typical highway speeds (I don't drive more than 70mph typically), I'm at more than 31mpg.  Around town is about 22mpg.  I know you mentioned not towing, but apples to apples towing, I was right on 50% more mpg with the same load over the same trip.

 

One thing I did not calculate is DEF usage but to be honest, it's so minimal of an expense that it's not worth factoring in.  

 

I think you'd find the fuel economy for your typical commute would be fantastic in the 3.0... I have the older 3.0 in my refreshed '22 and I've only heard that the newer is better in every way (including more power).

 

As for trim, I'm very happy with my Z71 RST, just enough bells and whistles without being a sticker shock situation.

Posted
Just now, N715DP said:

I have a 3.0 and 16,000 miles later I am still amazed at the fuel efficiency over my 5.3 Avalanche I had previously.  I know gas prices are a different world on your side of the country but I ran a spreadsheet for almost 15,000 miles and came up with about 30% more cost efficient across all types of driving versus my Avalanche.  I see a roughly 50% increase in fuel economy so the 30% number takes into account the higher cost of diesel versus regular unleaded.  At typical highway speeds (I don't drive more than 70mph typically), I'm at more than 31mpg.  Around town is about 22mpg.  I know you mentioned not towing, but apples to apples towing, I was right on 50% more mpg with the same load over the same trip.

 

One thing I did not calculate is DEF usage but to be honest, it's so minimal of an expense that it's not worth factoring in.  

 

I think you'd find the fuel economy for your typical commute would be fantastic in the 3.0... I have the older 3.0 in my refreshed '22 and I've only heard that the newer is better in every way (including more power).

 

As for trim, I'm very happy with my Z71 RST, just enough bells and whistles without being a sticker shock situation.

 

Thank you for your post! What kind of diesel do you have in PA? 

Posted

The 5.3 now and the 5.3 in your older Avalanche is not a good comparison in mpg. My 5.3 on a 650 mile trip got 25-27 mpg and around town it gets about 18- 20 mpg and iam not that easy on the peddle, yes the diesel will get a little better but you have to figure in the up charge for the diesel.

 

Posted

Standard ultra-low sulfur diesel is everywhere here (I think this is the same you'd have in CA).  In the winter, most stations switch to a winterized blend of #1 and #2 but I haven't noticed any difference in fuel economy or how the engine runs.  I typically fill up at one of the truck stops a few miles away as their prices are consistently less than your run-of-the-mill convenience store.  

 

 

Posted
Just now, Silverado4x4 said:

The 5.3 now and the 5.3 in your older Avalanche is not a good comparison in mpg. My 5.3 on a 650 mile trip got 25-27 mpg and around town it gets about 18- 20 mpg and iam not that easy on the peddle, yes the diesel will get a little better but you have to figure in the up charge for the diesel.

 

 

What year Silverado do you have in your 5.3 and trim level? And I would agree, the 5.3 with the 10 speed is a night and day difference compare to the 2004 and 2012 I had. 

Posted
Just now, N715DP said:

Standard ultra-low sulfur diesel is everywhere here (I think this is the same you'd have in CA).  In the winter, most stations switch to a winterized blend of #1 and #2 but I haven't noticed any difference in fuel economy or how the engine runs.  I typically fill up at one of the truck stops a few miles away as their prices are consistently less than your run-of-the-mill convenience store.  

 

 

 

We have very few #2 diesel stations left in the state from my research. It's all bio or renewable diesel. The owners manual states you can run up to B20 but it's recommended to use a condition or fuel additive with it. 

Posted

My other 5.3 was a 2019 with the 8 speed and I replaced it with a 2025 5.3 with the 10 speed, the 2025 hasn't been on that trip yet so iam expecting a little more but honestly I don't worry about mpg.

Posted
39 minutes ago, Z71RAD88 said:

 

We have very few #2 diesel stations left in the state from my research. It's all bio or renewable diesel. The owners manual states you can run up to B20 but it's recommended to use a condition or fuel additive with it. 

Hooray for the People's Republic of California! 🤣

Posted
Just now, PunchT37 said:

My ‘25 LT 2wd 5.3 with 3.42 gears has done this, at least at times. 
 

 

E36D1F76-2641-419B-94D2-A9312AF38EE2.jpeg

 

Wow. Impressive. Thanks for sharing. 

Posted

My '23 3.0L has done this -- for 28,000 miles. 

This is all fuel used. 

Hand calc numbers are a little better than the DIC numbers. 

Lifetime average is at 29.2 usmpg.

 

image.png.9ccd2c72c11b3124374136aeb977b378.png

Posted
Just now, redwngr said:

My '23 3.0L has done this -- for 28,000 miles. 

This is all fuel used. 

Hand calc numbers are a little better than the DIC numbers. 

Lifetime average is at 29.2 usmpg.

 

image.png.9ccd2c72c11b3124374136aeb977b378.png

 

The 3.0 fuel mileage is absolutely unreal. Glad GM still has this as an offering in the half ton market. 

Posted

My last 3 trucks, '12, 17 and 21 were all 6.2l.  My 2024 I got the 3.0L diesel for the fuel economy.  I have 2 friend who bought earlier versions, 2020 and a 2021, both GMC's and they tell me no complaints. Granted this owners have kept their trucks stock, no suspension lifts or big tires. Like me they have them for basic transportation.

 

 

2024 GMC Sierra Denali Window Stikcer.pdf

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.3k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,717
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Tiffanyrose
    Newest Member
    Tiffanyrose
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 1 Anonymous, 1,025 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I tried tapping it.  This might sound like a dumb question, you should feel vibration or some type of noise when it turns on? Can someone please verify? Thank you all!
    • I feel better now for my own view point and actions or lack there of towards the dealership service theme reading your post and others. GM corporate is who offers the two free oil changes on the HD trucks and I bought my truck in Feb of 2025 and those oil change offers run out within 2 years I believe and I highly doubt I will be using either one of them. I had asked if I could officially give those free services to another customer ( a friend ) and they said no, its all a GM corporate thing based on the vehicle in question. What that service advisor did however was go into a little story about how such and such customer was denied engine warranty because he had done his own oil changes because then they are not documented ... you see where that goes and so an employee playing the game of scaring the customer into having the service work done there most certainly triggered my thought process. At a later date I did talk to the person who handles warranty claims at the dealership and she said to be sure to document the oil changes and keep receipts for the oil and filter ( coped the receipts from cases of Mobil oil and case of filters I bought from them ) and the vehicles VIN, the date of service, mileage etc and staple that together as a record I would give them if that was ever needed and I keep my own log book for services for each vehicle as well. Oh and about 8 months after I bought the truck the dealer starts calling me to offer a maintenance service since they haven't seen my vehicle show up on their system ... for the mere fee of 300.00 Canadian to change the oil and rotate the tires and a few other minor checks and I declined the offer, I get the call again a couple of months later for the same thing and she could tell I was not interested and she asked if they should take my name off the call list and I said yes, do that !.    By the way did you happen to keep your factory oil filter to open it up and see the surprises inside as I expect some will show up as per the odd little sliver of metal shaving and particles that the filter does trap along with bits of grey silicone sealer that come off of the inside edge of mating surfaces. I have cut open every filter so far on my truck although few miles but have changed the oil often and the second filter was vastly better with very little of anything, that first filter was the unsettling one as I expected it would be. 
    • I get why they do this…but man…not ideal. I only extract on inboard boat engines because the drains are buried and even then I hate it because it’s easy to leave a quart behind with that method.   They should market it as an “oil refresh” not oil change!
    • I only get oil changed where I can watch. Valvoline pulls through the dipstick into a see thru glass. When done they show me the dipstick. About the only way they can mess up is using the wrong oil. But that secret wouldn’t stay secret long. Honda uses TQ wrenches on everything. You can watch through a plate glass window. Discount tires does that with tires. Trust but verify. 
    • I would not argue that with you. It would be pointless to argue against the truth and you speak the truth.    My question and in fact the entire point of this thread is an exploration into the levers of wear which happens no matter how well we maintain our powertrains.    Some of these levers we exert a good deal of influence over which can and do result is lower wear, longer powertrain life. Some others we are sort of stuck with.    An engine is typically done when the ring to bore seal no longer is able to do the job effectively. Normally the first thing to go in a engine otherwise well maintained and adult driven is this seal.    Looking into the means, methods, products and attitudes that influence the rate of wear seems a worthwhile inquiry to me.     
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...