Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, asilverblazer said:

Interesting, I haven't heard any rumors or information about the displacement changes on the 5.3 and 6.2; along with nothing new about the 8.3 diesel.

 

I wonder if the 6.6 currently in the HDs will be moving down to the light duty, which would be odd because all the tuning and engineering done on that engine was not done for the light duty consumer.

I dont have info on the details of the 6.6 in the 1500's other than the displacement and it will have AFM/DFM crap on it and likely a sizeable EGR so if its the same as the one used in the HD it will ruin all that makes the L8T good. 

The 5.3 and 6.2 are gone, not just changed. 

The 8.3 Duramax is entirely new and will have changes to the charge air cooler system along with other items. 

 

Posted
44 minutes ago, C/K Man said:

Both the Chevy and International versions of the joint venture trucks use the current Duramax. 

I believe it is detuned from the pickup application. Thats been common for the Dmax in applications other than pickups. 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, 64BAwagon said:

I believe it is detuned from the pickup application. Thats been common for the Dmax in applications other than pickups. 

 

 

Yes but it is a different RPO code due to there being a smaller turbo, different fuel injectors and different state of tune. 

 

Prior generations carried the same RPO code as the pickups and de-tuned but LBZ was skipped.  They used the LB7 2003-2004, the LLY 2004.5-2006 and then went straight to LMM for 2007-2009.   

Edited by newdude
  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted

'If it's not broke, why fix it?'

 

My pet peeve is the 'chrome' inlay in the floor trim for the front doors. I can see if a person isn't careful w/ their boots getting in & out they will be scraped up in no time.

 

Does GM's braintrust not know that some of us use them as trucks, not cars?

  • 2 months later...
Posted

Do not lower the trucks, clearance is one of the top needs for people who buy trucks to use them for their intended purpose. 🤔

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Black02Silverado said:

I wonder if the rear window leak will be finally fixed?

 

Is it around the outside where the glass meet the body (not the @ the sliding portion)? If yes, maybe tell the beancounters 'X' amount of urethane is required to effect a proper seal...

Posted
1 hour ago, Black02Silverado said:

I wonder if the rear window leak will be finally fixed?

 

25 minutes ago, revrnd said:

 

Is it around the outside where the glass meet the body (not the @ the sliding portion)? If yes, maybe tell the beancounters 'X' amount of urethane is required to effect a proper seal...

 

 

 

Posted

In reference to Ford offering 2 tone paint I just saw an F150 with charcoal as the primary upper & lower colour & red for the secondary. It's probably too late for the body design to be changed, but I find 'the swoop' on the 1500 fender & door doesn't lead itself to a 2 tone paint, unless it was the less popular version from back in the day where the lower portion of the truck was the secondary colour.

Posted
On 7/22/2025 at 3:16 PM, revrnd said:

Not sure where you get that from the article...

Totally 180. I

messed up. 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I prefer the rear HDMI ports over what appears to be a copy of a C4 ZR1 exhaust tips on a pickup.

 

No doubt the new engines will be great. Not excited that the interior appears to favor a giant open billboard screen for the instrument cluster versus the nicely inset and shrouded cluster the trucks have today.

 

The rear window appears to be fixed, it's a one-piece rear glass design with a portal for the center opening section like the Fords have. It's probably more cost effective to build that way, too.

 

Going from a 327 back to a 350 or 400 V8 should make a lot of the oldtimers happy 😉

Posted
30 minutes ago, Atlas said:

Going from a 327 back to a 350 or 400 V8 should make a lot of the oldtimers happy 😉

Im not sure if any of the braintrust realised that some people would be disappointed when the base V8 was reduced to a 5.3, probably not born when 327s were common. Likely never heard of 'bigger is better' either.

 

Only thing I can think of is to differentiate it from the 6.0 L which were never offered in the half tons.

 

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,837
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    bellssn690
    Newest Member
    bellssn690
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 901 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Yes, and also pulling heavy trailers or a large camper up steep grades as well as descending grades such as the more rustic off road camping locations and using engine braking with that low gearing as well as soft ground can just suck the power . I realize pickups these days tend to have an over all lower first gear ratio compared to automatic transmission pickups from years back so that has helped a lot in its ability in high range but there comes a point if in four wheel drive the torque runs out at the wheels, certainly with a gas engine. They don't put two speed transfer cases on pickups for a cool factor, they have a function if one needs that massive torque to the wheels that high range can't deliver. 
    • Notes 7/18/2026   3,400 miles on this batch of Mobil 1 Euro 5W40 since the GDI pump replacement. Alcohol runs very clean when ring seal is tight and the sump isn't getting hosed with fuel. Checked oil level at fill up today as is my practice and grabbed a white Kleenex to look at the color. What color?  I was going to change it but.....  
    • 4 low is really nice on steep boat ramps. 
    • Interesting, I suspect I would have fueled up in Lee Vining as the day prior I would have filled up either in Laughlin or near there and maybe again before I entered Death Valley and once out the other side late that evening as I kept on driving into the night up near Lee Vining. Next morning I most likely fueled up in LV before heading over Tioga Pass into ( as I refer to it as "Yose .... Mite" 😁 ). And again that was 19 years ago but the price then must not have jumped out at me like the 5 bill a gallon theme of nutty cult hippy country Big Sir or head so far up their rear Aspen. I'd be curious to know where the highest prices are in the lower 48, I probably would not be far off to guess somewhere in Cali forn ie. Coldfoot and Prudhoe bay may have those prices beat but that is a whole other world up there and when prices are more normal elsewhere that is about what they can be up there I believe in no mans land. Anyway interesting that the 395 corridor is hosing people and the thing is, its tourist season and its not like there are a lot of competition options when driving up that highway from what I could see. Yup, big ole Boaterhomes and various other RV's ahead and behind me at the Yosemite entrance gate and they have to get their fuel somewhere.  
    • Those can be high, as well as the big California cities. The ones that will pop your eyes out are the 395 corridor on the Eastern side of the Sierra Nevadas. Lee Vining, $7.19 for regular and $8.89 for diesel is what the Google said right now.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...