Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 7/15/2025 at 9:32 PM, C/K Man said:

So, if the Corporate Average Fuel Economy requirements are essentially eliminated, what does in mean for the next generation Silverado/Sierra? 

 

At least 3 more years of confusion. :( 

Posted

The only thing that happened was the EPA rescinded California's waiver to set stricter emissions standards than Federal. And fines are on hold/delayed for not meeting the escalating fuel economy standards set forth in the next few years.

 

That doesn't preclude any automaker from following a higher standard than Federal, which many of them are doing as a course of business anyway. Many of the automakers still need to meet European fuel economy and emissions targets, at least there are people with brains still running things over there.

 

Stellantis' decision to kill its 5.7 was unrelated. It was brought back under a change of CEO, not government regs. Nobody except the Hemi diehards cared, it wasn't a great engine anyway. Too bad they aren't replacing it with something better that doesn't eat cams.

 

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Don't believe what you read on the internet.....

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Atlas said:

The only thing that happened was the EPA rescinded California's waiver to set stricter emissions standards than Federal. And fines are on hold/delayed for not meeting the escalating fuel economy standards set forth in the next few years.

 

That doesn't preclude any automaker from following a higher standard than Federal, which many of them are doing as a course of business anyway. Many of the automakers still need to meet European fuel economy and emissions targets, at least there are people with brains still running things over there.

 

Stellantis' decision to kill its 5.7 was unrelated. It was brought back under a change of CEO, not government regs. Nobody except the Hemi diehards cared, it wasn't a great engine anyway. Too bad they aren't replacing it with something better that doesn't eat cams.

 

 

Low quality materials across the board on all manufactures is the issue and sadly it's only going to get worse all in the name of saving money. If you want a new vehicle and want it to last, you basically need to pull the engine and transmission and update it with quality parts, but then who can afford that?  Welcome to the world of disposable vehicles. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted (edited)
17 hours ago, Black02Silverado said:

Low quality materials across the board on all manufactures is the issue and sadly it's only going to get worse all in the name of saving money. If you want a new vehicle and want it to last, you basically need to pull the engine and transmission and update it with quality parts, but then who can afford that?  Welcome to the world of disposable vehicles. 

 

 

Per AI

 Planned obsolescence is a business strategy where products are designed to become obsolete (either through malfunction or becoming outdated) relatively quickly, encouraging consumers to purchase replacements. This practice is often criticized for its environmental impact and for potentially exploiting consumers by limiting the lifespan of products. 

 
Edited by Z45
Posted
1 hour ago, Z45 said:

 

 

Per AI

 Planned obsolescence is a business strategy where products are designed to become obsolete (either through malfunction or becoming outdated) relatively quickly, encouraging consumers to purchase replacements. This practice is often criticized for its environmental impact and for potentially exploiting consumers by limiting the lifespan of products. 

 

 

19 hours ago, Z45 said:

Don't believe what you read on the internet.....

 

Wait! WHAT? 

 

No, no, I get it, but that was just to easy.   :crackup: Sorry 😬  Don't believe the internet just the AI on it. Got it.  :)

 

AI is dead on this time. It understands business when It says this. A person is an idiot when they say it's true. 

 

Here's my unsolicited take on things like C.A.F.E.

 

Goals are good. Goals that improve life; better. Goals that create impossible situations to favor one sector over another, bad and I mean really bad. They are not 'fixing' anything. Air quality improvement was a headline story over COVID and people still drove, just less so. The lesson was NOT elimination. It was reduction. Reduction to a point the earths natural defensed can handle it. But that requires not just regulations, sensible regulation, but also cooperation and kids people don't want problems fixed when it imposes on their 'right' to do as they please instead of 'do as they ought'. 

 

:rant: 

Posted (edited)

Some people are just silly. You ask the government to fix anything it start off good usually. You ask the government to make a hammer better. They’ll start a think tank, establish two organizations spend billions. And finally eliminate the hammer. They can’t make the hammer better they claim. Instead they make you use a special nail gun. It’s powered by electric. You get electric from a coal generated plant. All the while the hammer manufactor  is making the hammer better to keep up with the competition. Even though you can get a government discount to buy the electric nail gun. After a few decades they realize the electric nail gun actually creates more pollution. The hammer meanwhile becomes more efficient. 

Edited by KARNUT
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

The Endangerment Finding was an attempt to advance a political agenda with junk science.  It too is gone for good.

Posted
1 hour ago, swathdiver said:

The Endangerment Finding was an attempt to advance a political agenda with junk science.  It too is gone for good.

"Traditionally, Republican administrations have believed in trying to reduce the regulatory burden, but I think they've paid more attention to the concerns of the business community," Holmstead says. "And I don't want to suggest that the Trump administration is impervious to those concerns. But for ideological reasons, they are doing a number of things that U.S. business is not supportive of."

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, swathdiver said:

junk science

Business doesn’t care what the right calls things. They don’t want to re-tool. 

  • Haha 1
Posted

I doubt we'll be seeing deleted diesels and carbureted V8's in new vehicles from the factory. This whole undoing is a scam...our nation has grown and has experienced unprecedented wealth accumulation since the Endangerment Finding, so I'm not really sure why we can't make money AND protect our air and water. At any rate, this is another disruption for businesses and investors as it just creates more near term uncertainty, and a higher likelihood that things will snap hard in the other direction again soon.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Atlas said:

I doubt we'll be seeing deleted diesels and carbureted V8's in new vehicles from the factory. This whole undoing is a scam...our nation has grown and has experienced unprecedented wealth accumulation since the Endangerment Finding, so I'm not really sure why we can't make money AND protect our air and water. At any rate, this is another disruption for businesses and investors as it just creates more near term uncertainty, and a higher likelihood that things will snap hard in the other direction again soon.

Indeed. Laws of physics won’t hold off long. 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, customboss said:

Indeed. Laws of physics won’t hold off long. 

 

Which one? LOL


Poop rolls downhill? What goes up, can definitely come crashing down? The wheels fall off the clown car eventually? Pedophiles will burn in hell?

Edited by Atlas
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I like the idea.  I would pick diesel if I had a choice. I need pictures though.
    • I've installed cheap eBay new aftermarket digitizers before.  They work.  Did a bunch of Cadillac CUE (aka Cadillac's MyLink) for someone years ago.  They all worked fine after the repair.    That number 22740886, that is a component part # for GM.  You can use it to search, but its not something that's obtainable at the dealer level.     So pretty much any of these will work - 2015 Colorado Digitizer for sale | eBay
    • Black bumper and the later years Z-71 style color matched grille.
    • You can install tailpipes that direct the exhaust sideways vs the OEM one that goes straight back. There are several on the market, do you own research. HOWEVER, you need to make sure the Venturi vents are still intact, otherwise it will throw a engine code. There is a sensor somewhere that detects back pressure on the exhaust. And if it doesn't collect the correct metrics, it will throw the truck into limp mode. 
    • "Teardown" is complete. Head surfaces are clean and ready, new intake is prepped and ready. Coolant drained and water pump is removed, radiator is removed, new hoses and pump are ready.   The replacement intake is also from a '95 (with I think 260k, the odometer said). Noticeably less pitting where it covers the rear coolant passages. I'm not sure if that's a tribute to more frequent use, more frequent coolant changes/upkeep, or if the intake was machined at some point. But it appears I found a good one.   My coolant hoses were original, and the lower hose still retained the factory spring inside. It's not really rusty, but it's got deposits all over it. Unsure if I should re-install it (will thoroughly clean it first). Someone said hose technology has gotten better since 1995 (has it?) and I don't need the spring. I think modern EPDM is what made those hoses last from 1995-2026, so it's a question of how much suction can the water pump really pull, and will it collapse the hose without a spring?   I'm stopped and waiting for parts, however.   When I first brought the truck home, the fan was intermittently hitting the radiator shroud. I could see someone had monkeyed with the shroud (put a bunch of cardboard as a spacer between the upper/lower shroud halves. Someone said the motor mounts have likely failed and the engine has sagged. I wasn't sure I believed that. The engine is really solid in its mounts: To remove the old intake I *just* nearly permanently welded to the heads with freshly cured RTV and gasket snot two weeks ago, I literally had to use the arms on my lift and a chain with a bolt attached to the intake to pull it loose. It almost picked the front of the truck off the ground before ....scuuuuuuuuuuup.... I could actually hear the gaskets tearing and it broke loose and the whole truck settled back down. Motor barely moved.   SO, those parts I'm waiting on... The lower radiator mounts/bushings had completely failed. The radiator needs to be insulated from the rad support, and the bushings help the rad stand at the correct height. The plastic "baffle" was also destroyed at some point. Someone had attached the shroud to it incorrectly, overlapping a joint that should have been underlapped, creating another suspect issue potentially causing things to hit the fan. Broken tabs, side is busted off, and it's perma-formed/bent where it was jimmied incorrectly.   The baffle? Unobtainum. Long since discontinued from GM, of course. Aftermarket/capa/chinese? Also unobtanium. In GM's infinite wisdom, it appears there are at least two different variations whether the Blazer is 2 or 4 door, and I can't yet tell if they shared the same part with the S-pickups. Plan B, if I can't find a viable used one, will be to create a bracket to re-assemble the critical joint I need to seal a gap with the shroud. But that will bug me, it won't be...perfect.   The water pump bolts appear to have been installed with...plumber's putty. I guess, sure, if it works...? I've found a few "backyard fixes" like that. Someone's been here before....   If I can't find someone to jam bamboo under my fingernails to fill my free time this week I think I'll install the driver's power window motor and replace the rear door speaker that's inop. I've got a genuine GM "9.5" ohm working replacement. Why GM used a non-standard resistance....nevermind. Of course they did, you can get more sound from a cheap factory amp that way.   And the saga goes on...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...