Water scarcity Texas water for sale, plus it’s going away

[Snowcamo]

15 minutes ago, customboss said:

I love ya Bro but no idea what you stated.

If I were a corporation that had the government in my pocket, that would be my plan. 

 

[Atlas]

10 hours ago, KARNUT said:

I don’t believe anything that so called climate experts say about the environment. In my lifetime the threat of climate cooling was a threat, later global warming. Now climate change is all the rage. It’s usually about money or control. 

 

Maybe farmers are more your speed. They're basically saying the same thing about climate change but focus more on the immediate effects, along with the financial companies that insure the crops.

 

I can tell you're a headline reader and don't go much beyond that. The 70's "ice age" theory wasn't a consensus, but it was studied as a possible model at a time when data was still being collected on warming models.

[customboss]

46 minutes ago, Snowcamo said:

If I were a corporation that had the government in my pocket, that would be my plan. 

 

That makes sense because they DO have at least the executive and congressional leadership under control. So far majority of Supreme Court too. 
Thanks for clarifying. 
 

 

[customboss]

12 minutes ago, Atlas said:

 

Maybe farmers are more your speed. They're basically saying the same thing about climate change but focus more on the immediate effects, along with the financial companies that insure the crops.

 

I can tell you're a headline reader and don't go much beyond that. The 70's "ice age" theory wasn't a consensus, but it was studied as a possible model at a time when data was still being collected on warming models.

Exxon had internal studies that confirmed warming in early 70’s but sat on it. Now 36% of us don’t care. 

[KARNUT]

9 minutes ago, Atlas said:

 

Maybe farmers are more your speed. They're basically saying the same thing about climate change but focus more on the immediate effects, along with the financial companies that insure the crops.

 

I can tell you're a headline reader and don't go much beyond that. The 70's "ice age" theory wasn't a consensus, but it was studied as a possible model at a time when data was still being collected on warming models.

There isn’t much we can do about climate change. Yes the climate changes. I don’t disagree with that. Pollution we can fix that. And have. Changing the climate, ridiculous. Headline reader, please. .

[Atlas]

29 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

There isn’t much we can do about climate change. Yes the climate changes. I don’t disagree with that. Pollution we can fix that. And have. Changing the climate, ridiculous. Headline reader, please. .

 

We can fix pollution (and apparently already have?), but we can't slow the man-made contribution to warming? Hint: Pollution is one of the causes of climate change.

 

I'll bet when Texas sees freezing temperatures there are a lot of guys walking around saying "gee, I guess global warming isn't real!"

[Snowcamo]

21 minutes ago, Atlas said:

 

We can fix pollution (and apparently already have?), but we can't slow the man-made contribution to warming? Hint: Pollution is one of the causes of climate change.

 

I'll bet when Texas sees freezing temperatures there are a lot of guys walking around saying "gee, I guess global warming isn't real!"

Climate change is what it is. It's part of living on this land and has happened since the dawn of time. It goes from cold to hot. 

 

Cows farting or polution have zero to do with anything but air quality.  

 

Anyone who lives in the DFW can tell you, during the lock down the sky's were clear AF! Lmao  

[KARNUT]

9 hours ago, Snowcamo said:

Climate change is what it is. It's part of living on this land and has happened since the dawn of time. It goes from cold to hot. 

 

Cows farting or polution have zero to do with anything but air quality.  

 

Anyone who lives in the DFW can tell you, during the lock down the sky's were clear AF! Lmao  

It’s fun watching the gullible buy into the nonsense. Time and time again they shift the narrative to suit their agenda. Mostly for money. Remember Al Gore. He made millions off his Global Warming nonsense. Wasn’t New York supposed to be under water by now. I remember driving to work in the seventies. It was the coming ice age. It was everywhere. Then it changed. That was the beginning of my questioning so called experts. And it’s my opinion. Just like everyone else’s. 

[Atlas]

10 hours ago, Snowcamo said:

Climate change is what it is. It's part of living on this land and has happened since the dawn of time. It goes from cold to hot. 

 

Cows farting or polution have zero to do with anything but air quality.  

 

Anyone who lives in the DFW can tell you, during the lock down the sky's were clear AF! Lmao  

 

Yes, this is true. You understand the climate changes throughout time because scientists and researchers told you so. And you can find evidence that shows you how the landscape has changed over time where ice once was. But when the same scientists show you the alarming rate of change in the past couple hundred years, change that outpaces previous change and looks very different, you think it's a lie.

 

Furthermore, people who don't believe in man-made climate change because of political and financial motivations simultaneously ignore the effort to bury, discredit, hide, and alter the findings. Take notice of large oil companies quietly diversifying and investing in cleaner energy. If you believe money ultimately leads to the truth, then, why are the deniers ignoring this?

 

The gullible swallowed the 70's ice age theory hook, line, and sinker, pole. Nobody would have cared except the media reported it, and the gullible are still talking about it 40 years later because they assumed it was fact and now use it to discredit real data on warming models. It's ridiculous how people say they don't believe the media, and then use regurgitated fact (from the media) to refute new data. 

 

You are also correct about the huge impact just a few weeks of widespread habit changes cleaned the air. Lockdowns aren't the answer to pollution, but Covid offered a rare glimpse of what a cleaner energy future could look like for air quality. So we agree that man definitely has a controllable interest in our own air quality.

 

Should we talk about water next?

[Snowcamo]

3 minutes ago, Atlas said:

 

Yes, this is true. You understand the climate changes throughout time because scientists and researchers told you so. And you can find evidence that shows you how the landscape has changed over time where ice once was. But when the same scientists show you the alarming rate of change in the past couple hundred years, change that outpaces previous change and looks very different, you think it's a lie.

 

Furthermore, people who don't believe in man-made climate change because of political and financial motivations simultaneously ignore the effort to bury, discredit, hide, and alter the findings. Take notice of large oil companies quietly diversifying and investing in cleaner energy. If you believe money ultimately leads to the truth, then, why are the deniers ignoring this?

 

The gullible swallowed the 70's ice age theory hook, line, and sinker, pole. Nobody would have cared except the media reported it, and the gullible are still talking about it 40 years later because they assumed it was fact and now use it to discredit real data on warming models. It's ridiculous how people say they don't believe the media, and then use regurgitated fact (from the media) to refute new data. 

 

You are also correct about the huge impact just a few weeks of widespread habit changes cleaned the air. Lockdowns aren't the answer to pollution, but Covid offered a rare glimpse of what a cleaner energy future could look like for air quality. So we agree that man definitely has a controllable interest in our own air quality.

 

Should we talk about water next?

 

I like this,  give me a few to reply as I'm out and about.  

[Snowcamo]

26 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

It’s fun watching the gullible buy into the nonsense. Time and time again they shift the narrative to suit their agenda. Mostly for money. Remember Al Gore. He made millions off his Global Warming nonsense. Wasn’t New York supposed to be under water by now. I remember driving to work in the seventies. It was the coming ice age. It was everywhere. Then it changed. That was the beginning of my questioning so called experts. And it’s my opinion. Just like everyone else’s. 

 

If people only knew the lies told.

Some times you have to make it make sense. 

[Snowcamo]

10 hours ago, Atlas said:

 

Yes, this is true. You understand the climate changes throughout time because scientists and researchers told you so.

No, don't believe what scientists state as their "research" is funded from the same group that pushes the narrative.  It gets deep. Won't go there for the sake of this thread. Keeping it simple enough...

10 hours ago, Atlas said:

 

And you can find evidence that shows you how the landscape has changed over time where ice once was. But when the same scientists show you the alarming rate of change in the past couple hundred years, change that outpaces previous change and looks very different, you think it's a lie.

I agree humans destroy this land and water. The change in its condition will happen the more it is colonized, the more time passes and the way it's creator wants it to. Nothing stays the same forever.

10 hours ago, Atlas said:

 

Furthermore, people who don't believe in man-made climate change because of political and financial motivations simultaneously ignore the effort to bury, discredit, hide, and alter the findings.

Yes, I personally ignore anything they say. Again why should I pay any attention to facts biased toward a narrative?

10 hours ago, Atlas said:

Take notice of large oil companies quietly diversifying and investing in cleaner energy. If you believe money ultimately leads to the truth, then, why are the deniers ignoring this?

If you truly understood that companies and people with more money and less moral then you run the show...

Now make this make sense. Our country has oil, yet we buy elswhere. This land has no shortage of anything. Except humble people.

The government is full of folks with their hands in oil and oil companies have the governments hands in thier pockets. This is fact.

 

So yeah pay attention to an oil company secretly turning green. I mean didnt the gov want to go green? Its just not going to work.

10 hours ago, Atlas said:

The gullible swallowed the 70's ice age theory hook, line, and sinker, pole. Nobody would have cared except the media reported it, and the gullible are still talking about it 40 years later because they assumed it was fact and now use it to discredit real data on warming models. It's ridiculous how people say they don't believe the media, and then use regurgitated fact (from the media) to refute new data. 

 

You are also correct about the huge impact just a few weeks of widespread habit changes cleaned the air. Lockdowns aren't the answer to pollution, but Covid offered a rare glimpse of what a cleaner energy future could look like for air quality. So we agree that man definitely has a controllable interest in our own air quality.

 

Should we talk about water next?

Make it make sense k. Think, if the gov cared about going green... they would of converted to water power along time ago. Fact is there's ZERO money to be made in that respect. 

 

Let's see how the young black man who is turning plastic into petro succeeds in changing the world. That's the ultimate go green project for EVERY government. Issue is there's no money to be made then either as we would just use recycled plastic..

 

Having a non biased outlook on life will really help see through man's bull.

 

Water, let's go...  

Edited November 15, 2025 by Snowcamo

[Atlas]

2 hours ago, Snowcamo said:

Having a non biased outlook on life will really help see through man's bull.

 

Let me know when you get there.

 

Perhaps a more realistic goal is to recognize bias and how bias hardens opinions.

[Snowcamo]

3 minutes ago, Atlas said:

 

Let me know when you get there.

 

Perhaps a more realistic goal is to recognize bias and how bias hardens opinions.

 

Sorry no bias here.  Maybe if I was not speaking facts.  I get it though.  Have a great one.

Enjoy the weekend.

[Atlas]

On 11/15/2025 at 6:49 PM, Snowcamo said:

 

Sorry no bias here.  Maybe if I was not speaking facts.  I get it though.  Have a great one.

Enjoy the weekend.

 

Everyone has bias, and that's a fact.