Jump to content

Ihsi Rates Sierra/silverado "poor" For Side Impact Crashes.


Recommended Posts

Posted

This can't be good press for GM

 

http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2009/autos/...sh_tests/2.html

 

Front impact: Good

Side Impact: Poor

Whiplash protection: Acceptable

Stability Control: Optional

Top Safety Pick: No

While they earned the top grade of "Good" for front-crash protection, General Motors big trucks got a "Poor" rating from the Insurance Institute for side-impact protection.

 

The problem, according to the Institute, is a weak side structure combined with the absence of body-protecting side airbags. These trucks do have head-protecting side airbags and those worked well, but those airbags don't protect ribs and internal organs.

 

The Silverado and Sierra earned top ratings for both front and side impact protection from the federal government's National Highway Safety Administration, which uses different tests from those used by the Insurance Institute.

 

"IIHS tests are valid and we do pay attention to them," GM said in a statement responding to the Insurance Institute, "but it's also important to understand the results of a single test do not determine whether a vehicle is safe or not."

 

GM will be making changes to these trucks for the 2010 model year that will allow them to perform better on the Insurance Institute's tests, a GM spokeswoman said separately.

Posted
I'd rather be in my truck then a Mini Cooper or one of those fuggin' Smart Cars if I got t-boned.

 

 

I agree, I wouldn't want to be in one of those is I T-Boned them with my truck either!!

Posted
I'd rather be in my truck then a Mini Cooper or one of those fuggin' Smart Cars if I got t-boned.

 

 

I agree, I wouldn't want to be in one of those is I T-Boned them with my truck either!!

 

 

Got that right!

Posted
i really could give two shits about crash ratings.

 

Yeah, until you've been in one, flown to Shock Trauma, and spend the next four months 'learning' to walk again. Then you start to care, trust me I have the Titanium to prove it!

Posted
i really could give two shits about crash ratings.

 

Yeah, until you've been in one, flown to Shock Trauma, and spend the next four months 'learning' to walk again. Then you start to care, trust me I have the Titanium to prove it!

 

 

 

Amen. No one cares about stuff like this until a semi plows in to them at 65 MPH. This stuff matters. I've been there.

Posted
i really could give two shits about crash ratings.

 

Yeah, until you've been in one, flown to Shock Trauma, and spend the next four months 'learning' to walk again. Then you start to care, trust me I have the Titanium to prove it!

 

 

 

Amen. No one cares about stuff like this until a semi plows in to them at 65 MPH. This stuff matters. I've been there.

 

 

+1

Posted

I looked at the IIHS tests and noticed a substantial difference in their tests. They tested the Tundra DoubleCab, but chose the Chevy Crew Cab. The test sled for side impact hits the rear cab wall of the Tundra, but misses it on the Chevy, meaning that full force goes to the doors and the center pillar. Hardly a fair comparison. Another important point: the NHTSA safety tests give the Silverado/Sierra twins 5-stars front and side impact. Go figure...

 

That said, all new vehicles should come standard with a full complement of air bags and head restraints. How can GM sticker a medium-optioned 4wd truck at almost $40k and not have full safety options included?

Posted

I'm watching the video and I'm not noticing much of a difference between them. The Silverado did seem to cave more, but its not like the barrier was on the driver's lap. After that severe of a wreck anyways I don't think you'd walk away. Look at how bad the neck on the dummy snapped sideways, even in the trucks with curtain airbags. Also, some people take crash tests too serious. They don't necessarily show what will happen in the real world. No two crashes are alike. I'm not excusing GM's poor showing, and congrats to the F150, Tundra, and Ridgeline (did they really include it in a large pickup comparison???). Just saying that even after watching that I'm not regretting buying my Sierra and if I had to do it over again, I still wouldn't buy another truck.

Posted
I'd rather be in my truck then a Mini Cooper or one of those fuggin' Smart Cars if I got t-boned.

 

Exactly...I can't imagine why anyone would drive a Smart car. I can't see you having a chance if you were hit by anything of any considerable size. Swatting a fly comes to mind...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 2024 l8t . Ac has never felt really cold even new. But lately it seems a little warmer. When it gets in the upper 80s and a little more humid it just does not keep up. And sometimes at idle it gets warm. My wife's 2008 envoy is better. My son's 2016 is colder. I have an apointment for a third try Monday the 29th at a third dealer to try and get cold ac before my warranty is out. The first two told me something about so many degrees under ambient temp blah blah blah seemed like they didn't want to mess with me. This was set at low. Max air fan speed high. 87 degrees and a little humid.   .
    • It isn’t all that bad in the world with purchasing power versus quality. My first car had just basic equipment. My oil choice was conventional oil. The life expectancy was around 100K miles. During that time you could expect to change all the accessories. Today with inflation you can buy the equivalent. It comes fully loaded with 4 doors. The life expectancy passes 100K miles replacing no accessories. If reaching that milestone is your goal you simply follow the recommended service intervals. If you want more miles simply do more maintenance. When in doubt you can check the internet or YouTube for information. The selling of any product hasn’t changed since the beginning of time. The power of the buyer has. The price of the product hasn’t changed much with inflation. The buying public wants more. Competition and the buying public has put the sellers in a box. The greed is on both sides. You can still get more for less. You just have to do with less. That used to be popular. The buying public has changed . It’s the sellers that are trying to keep up. As Grumpy tries to inform the readers in this case with maintenance. If you want more. More effort is required. That information wasn’t available this easily just a few years ago. I believe the public has more power. Getting information is easier.
    • Gentlemen, I'm new to this forum. My question is, I thought I have read somewhere that the rear wheel liners for 2024- 2026 GMC Sierra HD3500 DRW can/will fit the 2023. I can't seem to find that information again and wondering if anybody has any knowledge if these will work or not with the 2023? Part# is 84892542. Thank you for any information. The GMC parts counter wasn't able to give my any definitive answer? 
    • Spacers aren’t safe anyway, so you’re better off just buying something else.  
    • Its because they have thread locking compound on them. I would bet money that they are actually reusable and not a literal TTY bolt because GM and most other OEMs don't trust techs and the end-user to apply thread locker properly in the same way they don't trust anyone to solder properly (and instead instructing crimps everywhere). Torque To Angle =/ Torque To Yield.   If you think dealerships or any technician replaces every 'discard' bolt in every procedure, I have a bridge to sell you.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...