Jump to content

Is your GMT-900 using oil  

1,555 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Where can we find this TSB? My buddy has to get his fixed and doesn't want to have fight the dealer. If he has to fight to get it fixed under warranty he'll be driving a Blue Oval.

 

Got the document .. thanks... it will come in handy at the next dealership visited. The one I bought the truck from is still quoting I need do the consumption tests..

Edited by DataSponge
Posted

O.K. Here is the information you people want to see. In Google Search, punch in..... Document ID: 3242444. It is the first topic on the list. (PDF# 100601008G EngineOil Consumption on Aluminum Block/Iron Block). It will give you 8 pages of detailed information that mechanics need to properly service this problem. Including Build Prior dates to inform you that it may be possible that some 2011 already have the updated parts!

 

Now on the first page, under "Condition", last sentence reads: It is no longer necessary to have the customer return multiple times to have the usage verified.

 

I came back to add that if using Firefox, the document will download to "Downloads" in the tools tab.

THANKS!

Posted

 

Almost 77,000 miles.

 

Thanks. I was curious; some others with higher mileage have said that after their piston rings got clogged up, the top-engine cleaner/new valve cover/oilpan deflector fix did not stop the oil usage--they still had to get new rings. Good luck and please keep us posted.

Posted

Reading over the TSB reaffirmed the procedures I have taken early on with my engine.... installed a PCV oil catch can and disabled the AFM function. Maybe would not have had any issues anyway, but just giving me an edge.

  • Like 1
Posted

Going for the valve cover, decarb and pan pvc fix. Service mgr said it has stopped the problem on all they have done. Will see. May take your advice and add catch can after the repair.

 

Good news is my friend went from an '11 to a loaded '14 SLT CC. Been driving it for 6 months. No issues what so ever. If I can get this one down to about 1/2-3/4 qts per 5,000 change may keep. If not,'15 if I can find the scratch.

Posted
I have a 2000 5.3L iron block. 201,000 miles and i use conventional motor oil. No oil leaks.

 

Great to hear your gmt800 isn't using oil. this thread is related to gmt900 trucks many differences in the engines between the models (AFM)

 

 

Ryan

Posted

Great to hear your gmt800 isn't using oil. this thread is related to gmt900 trucks many differences in the engines between the models (AFM) Ryan

Wait. I prob should have posted my poll answer.

Every 3K I use about 1.5 - 2 quarts of oil.......

Posted

Wait. I prob should have posted my poll answer.

Every 3K I use about 1.5 - 2 quarts of oil.......

The poll is about GMT900 trucks.

 

Still sorry to hear that your engine uses so much oil though.

 

so long

j-ten-ner

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

My 09 Tahoe has been consuming about a quart every 3,000 miles. It started kicking out smoke when I start it (48,000 miles) so I took it in. They are going to install the deflector and clean the engine. I will be out of warranty very soon so I'm worried about it. Any advice?

 

ETA: I also have an 09 Silverado but it has an iron block and isn't consuming any oil. Is there anyone with oil consumption that has an iron block?

Edited by pezboy
Posted

I just added the Range module Wednesday. I am at 1000 miles on my current oil change which I found is when the consumption begins. I will let you all know what I find. I am currently at 106,500 miles.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Currently at 107250 and down 1/2 qt. the range seems to slow the consumption a bit but not eliminate it. I do not have any AFM rattle which is a plus.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,778
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    daveishi
    Newest Member
    daveishi
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 1,057 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...