Jump to content

Hard to start after sitting for 2+ days


Recommended Posts

Posted

My 99 with 5.7L has become difficult to start when it has been sitting for a couple of days, or more. Normally, I'd say I crank it for about 1 second and it fires right up. When it has been sitting for a couple of days, and I crank it for 1 second (I let off the starter out of habit), it seems to fire on a couple of cylinders, but that's it (it's like I *almost* cranked it long enough, but not quite). I can try cranking it for 1-2 seconds 5 or 6 more times and it won't start. If I crank and hold it for at least 5 seconds, it will finally start. When driving it daily, or maybe letting it sit for one day, it starts right up with the normal crank time.

 

The last time this happened, I just kept cranking after the first attempt. It took well over 10 seconds of cranking, but it finally started. It kind of reminds me of the 'vapor lock' symptoms of the 70's.

 

Anyone had a problem like this? Any idea what's going on?

 

I first noticed the problem this summer, during a camping trip, so it's not a cold weather issue.

Posted

Have you tried just turning the key to "On", let the system reprime, then try to start? If it fires right up I'd say your fuel system is losing it's prime. Also you could have the battery load tested. Your battery might be getting weak.

Posted

I'll second '06Sierra on begining with the fuel system. Those symptoms were the earliest warning I got of the impending fuel pump failure on my '99 'Hoe 5.7. Then again, gradual fuel system pressure loss can be as simple as a worn/faulty gas cap.

Posted

With no more information, I would also guess fuel pump. My brother in law just had the same symptoms on his 1999 or 2000 CK with 5..7 and replaced the fuel pump for a cure.

Posted

Thanks, all, for the replies. The fuel filter was changed out last year, so that *shouldn't* be the problem. I was wondering about fuel pressure. I had the fuel pump replaced about 8-9 years ago as an (incorrect) attempt to fix the problem with the fuel gauge, so it's not the original.

 

I hadn't thought about the fuel cap. I realize the system is pressurized and that the fuel pump is engaged when you turn the key on. So, the next time I try to start it after it's been sitting for a few days and it doesn't start after the normal crank time, I should turn the key back to on for, say 10 seconds? If it starts during normal cranking after that, does it likely mean that the fuel pressure is dropping way down over a period of 2-3 days? Is that what you mean by "losing its prime"?

 

Maybe a fuel pressure tester is the right next step? I would have to buy one. Do you just attach it at the fuel rail and test the pressure there? Is the pressure regulator an easy part to get at on this model year?

 

The battery is not new, but I figure if it can crank for 10-15 seconds, it's still in good shape.

Posted

You didn't say how many miles that you have but if it is a high mileage engine, sitting for a few days will allow most of the oil to run off the cylinder walls and rings. You could be starting to experience low compression at start up.

 

You may want to perform a cold compression test after the truck sits for a few days.

 

If you can crank the engine for 15 seconds, it's not a low voltage issue. The voltage only gets lower as the engine cranks, so you have higher voltage the 1st few seconds. You say that is has to crank longer then it starts, so that's not the issue.

Posted

Yup that's what I meant by losing prime. As far as exact hook up to check pressure I'm not sure but it sounds right to hook up to the rail. Sorry I can't really help you on the rest of your questions. I'm stilling reading the Chilton's to learn about my truck. Most of what I've learned about GM trucks has been from this forum.

  • 10 months later...
Posted

This problem has continued from time to time over these many months. It does seem to be getting more predictable after it has sat for a few days. I finally got a fuel pressure tester and hooked it up before I started it (I think it's been sitting for 4-5 days). I was kind of surprised to see the fuel pressure come right up to just over 60 PSI when I turned the key on (so it seems to be priming just fine). While cranking, the fuel pressure stayed above 60. When it finally started, it ran rough for a about 15 seconds before smoothing out. While running, the fuel pressure is about 54 PSI.

 

One thing to note: when I first tried to start it and cranked for the usual 1-2 seconds before 'letting go' of the key, it seemed like it kept firing a single cylinder every second, or so (kind of like dieseling, but much slower than I'm familiar with--the engine wasn't really running at all). It fired 5-6 times before I finally turned the key off.

 

BTW, it took me a while to find the Shrader valve because it's hidden behind some hoses, but it's on the fuel supply line near the rear of the driver's side valve cover (in case this helps someone else).

Posted

You didn't say how many miles that you have but if it is a high mileage engine, sitting for a few days will allow most of the oil to run off the cylinder walls and rings. You could be starting to experience low compression at start up.

 

Yikes, wavery! That's kinda scary (especially approaching Halloween as we are :-) but you could very well be right. It has over 160,000 miles on it.

Posted

1st thing one moring try disconnecting the line to the fuel pressure regulator. If it is wet with gasoline, replace it with a new AC Delco unit.

 

Then report back to us the next moring you try and start it...

Posted

1st thing one moring try disconnecting the line to the fuel pressure regulator. If it is wet with gasoline, replace it with a new AC Delco unit.

Then report back to us the next moring you try and start it...

 

 

What he said.

Posted

I've had a hard time figuring out exactly where the fuel pressure regulator is, despite having BOTH a Chilton manual and Factory Service Manual. I just can't find a decent diagram in the FSM that shows where the regulator is.

I *think* it's on the driver's side top of the engine, but it has a breather tube to the valve cover (which the regulator on my older GM car doesn't have).

I think you mean to disconnect the vacuum line to the pressure regulator--that's connected on the side, right? About a 1/4" diameter black tube kind of pointing toward the left-front of the truck, right? When I disconnected that (and it's hard to get off), I didn't see any fuel come out.

Also, I can't find in the manuals where it says what the fuel pressure is *supposed* to be. Is 60 PSI too high? Or normal? In my other GM car, the fuel pressure is supposed to be about 40 PSI. What kind of problem would too high fuel pressure cause? Would it make the engine hard to start?

Thanks for the help... sorry for the delay in replying (been out of town).

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I started it two separate times in the past week after it sat for more than 3 days each time. It fired right up each time, so that makes me think it's not as likely it's a compression issue because low compression would be a pretty consistent thing, right?

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I believe fuel pressure should be between 55 & 65 on this engine. I have the same year/engine and mine is typically ~62.

 

Here is a good video on fuel pressure problems on this truck:

 

 

(From the description) They go over:

1. How to test a fuel pump relay in a power distribution box.

2. Power side switched circuit design description and operation.

3. Bias voltage on an output. How and why is it used.

4. Fuel pump power and ground testing.

5. How to manually jump a fuel pump from the fuse box

6. How to measure fuel pump current flow.

 

I am not in any way connected with those who made this video, I just found it interesting and helpful.

 

I am having the same trouble with my truck. Another thing that I have checked so far is the Engine Coolant Temperature sensor. It is in the front of the engine, near the thermostat. It can be checked by taking an ohm reading on the sensor leads. Your Chilton's should have the correct resistance for various temperatures. You can also check the wires of the lead to be sure you have 5 volts there.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Lake Speed is drumming up business for his company just by being in the spot-light so he has a vested interest in stoking the 0W-20 fire.  IMO  
    • I knew when I bought my truck that it had off road hill decent or craw control or whatever they call it and rolled my eyes at that but it gets throw on with other options my truck has, I just never had a heads up if the highway speed regular cruise setting had anything to do with the brakes and that took me by surprise. If you've ever been to the top of Pikes Peak and watched those ahead of you on the way down with their brake lights on constantly, one can guess they are probably not gearing down or not enough anyway if their vehicle will allow and a good reason their is a brake check spot part way down where they use an infra red heat gun to check how hot ones brakes are front and rear.    Your right that once one gets out of the front range by Denver and I've not been on that stretch of 285 between Denver and Fairplay myself but I know its high and Fairplay at 10000 feet, Buena Vista at 8000, it drops a bit from there but then your going back up and over the 11000 pass and Durango is at 6500 . So yes your definitely right that 6500 and a lot higher is the theme of going anywhere out in that direction from Denver but hey, the down hill sections give fantastic fuel mileage !.    I don't even look at the fuel pumps for what premium costs here, since I live on a farm and up to this point get fuel delivered I am rarely in front of a fuel pump and when I am, I am often using card lock bulk fuel stations so it tells me what the price is AFTER I buy the fuel. Looking up on gas buddy and converting to US gallons but in Canadian dollars, regular on average of the prices listed was around 5.95 and premium is around 7.00 . That was one reason I did not go for the 6.2 half ton aside from its lack of carrying/towing if one was going by the rule of using premium fuel and until recently one could only buy regular farm gas if playing the few cents off game for farm dyed fuel for a "farm licensed pickup". But yes I hear you on the fuel price difference and like the diesel theme with it often being more expensive then gas it doesn't have quite the charm to it either as it once did although right now here for some reason the price of diesel has come down more so its now inline with the price of regular gas. 
    • I agree with this assessment. As you know I’m testing longevity with vehicles for the first time. I have a few vehicles I passed to kids and grandkids. We’re all past 100K miles some approaching 170K. I’m the only one doing 5k oil changes. The rest whatever the minder says. I’m the only one doing frequent transmission service. My odyssey the trip vehicle at 200K will be finished as a trip vehicle. I recently changed to high mileage oil, Valvoline. I can’t get past the fact that all manufacturers want to claim long service life. I just don’t make sense that they would go with low weight oil for mileage. While sacrificing longevity.
    • There's absolutely a mountain of profit in catering to the "I do my own research" crowd, people who are certain they know better. And I don't mean there isn't data to support that 0w40 produces less wear product than 0w20 in an engine like the 3.0 Duramax, that only feeds them the assurance they need. Again, my whole thing with oil selection is, sure, 0w40 or 0w30 produces less wear product. Are we talking the difference between the engine lasting only 100k versus 200k? Or are we talking more like, if the engine will already go 350k on a good 0w20 regimen recommended by the OE, is using 0w40 going to get us to 355k, assuming we can even get the rest of the truck to last that long, meanwhile sacrificing the first 5y, 100k in powertrain warranty. The answer isn't easy, there are tradeoffs.   I willfully use 0w20 Dexos D for this reason, knowing that a 0w40 will produce slightly less wear. I don't believe the delta in wear product is meaningful over the lifetime of the engine, and I place much more importance on driving style and overall feeding and care of the engine as a whole. It's the mentality that someone can abstain from alcohol their whole life which is an amazing boost to health by itself, theoretically. But if they're sedentary, that lifestyle choice will most likely kill them young despite their other, concerted efforts. Maybe someone doesn't drink AND they are the perfect picture of health and activity AND they use 0w40 AND they treat their engine perfectly. If living until 130 years is the goal, sure, do that. But it's going to be a really old truck falling apart around a good engine for that last 30 years, without a doubt.   I watched Demonworks' other video on the 100k+ 3.0 Duramax that had dealer 0w20 changes on what appears to be OLM-prescribed intervals (8-10k).   The QR codes are still present and readable on the main bearings. That's how little wear it has.   That's not proof that anyone else should stick to 0w20, but it's confirmation, for me, that 0w20 is perfectly acceptable to use in these engines.
    • 1Based on independent testing of OE 0W-20 in the Peugeot TU3M Wear Test as required by the dexos1 Gen 2 specification.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...