Jump to content

10W30 in a 2011? Seriously?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I use full synthetic to . Wall mart offers some great deals on oil sometimes .

 

 

Gotta love Wally world. But my buddy works at a Canadian tire oil change spot and he always fill with full syn... I pay for the cheapest stuff... Always works out to be cheaper and I don't have to lift a finger!

 

I dont trust other people changing my oil . Like in canadian tire and wallmart they dont get paid enough to do a good job and might not tighten up something right .
Posted

I use full synthetic to . Wall mart offers some great deals on oil sometimes .

 

 

Gotta love Wally world. But my buddy works at a Canadian tire oil change spot and he always fill with full syn... I pay for the cheapest stuff... Always works out to be cheaper and I don't have to lift a finger!

 

I dont trust other people changing my oil . Like in canadian tire and wallmart they dont get paid enough to do a good job and might not tighten up something right .

 

 

You can't beat the 5 qt jug of Mobil 1 at Wal-Mart for price. Also, I would encourage everyone to actually research the oil life system that GM has come up with. If you're changing the oil before that light comes on you're really doing it too much. The OLM tracks engine temperature/rpms/miles. It by no means looks only at miles/kms. I've had it come on at 5xxx, and as far out as 8xxx when driving nothing but highway across U.S.

Posted

I know the oil life indicator does more than chek how many miles, but I still am a believer in changing your oil at regular intervals and keeping it clean. Fresh and clean oil will always be better than trusting a computer to tell me how good my oil is. I don't think te truck had a lab under the hood to test my oil every 1000km.

Posted

I know the oil life indicator does more than chek how many miles, but I still am a believer in changing your oil at regular intervals and keeping it clean. Fresh and clean oil will always be better than trusting a computer to tell me how good my oil is. I don't think te truck had a lab under the hood to test my oil every 1000km.

 

 

+1

Posted
I don't think the truck had a lab under the hood to test my oil every 1000km.

 

 

I'm sure there was quite a bit of oil sampling going on during the developmental stages of the system to determine the proper algorithms for change interval. That said, I still go for a fixed interval of 5k or one year; that one year usually rolls around first, so time is my main parameter.

Posted

The OLM does NOT just monitor engine revolutions. Each specific engine has a stored maximum "bank" of set engine duty cycles (revolutions) between OCIs, reset by the user at time of service. Each time the PCM fires, it subtracts the number of revolutions from the bank. When the bank = 0, the "Change Engine Oil" or oil light illuminates. Outside air temp, coolant temp, cold soak time, throttle load, vehicle speed, etc. are all accounted for in an effort to predict oil temperature, which in turn assess an exponential penalty factor. If the oil temp is above or below the standard algorithm allowance, the amount of degradation increases and is subtracted from the bank value at a higher rate. Hence, if you drive short trips in cold temps, the OLM ticks away faster. If you track your Vette with high rpm/loads, the OLM ticks away faster. If you tow, well you get the idea...

 

The ONLY thing the OLM cannot account for is a mechanical engine fault. If you have a leaky air filter or a coolant leak, the OLM will never know or change it's signaled OCI. This is where and oil condition monitor would be superior. GM chose this route for simplicity/cost. They are willing to stake a 5yr/100K powertrain warranty on it, so it can't be too terrible.

 

IMHO, the intervals are a bit on the high side, usually signaling for a change right at the time the oil is spent. I prefer a buffer of 10-20%, but have no qualms about going to 0%. I have yet to see a bad UOA by following the OLM

Posted

On my change oil thing I have to reset it every time ? So I dont believe it is that advance .

 

 

EXACTLY!...........If it really operated the way people say it does, there would be no need to reset it, it would know the oil is clean, new and not broken down, it would reset itself like the fuel gauge miles to empty does.

 

Change your oil as often as you like, it's your truck, take care of it.

Posted

On my change oil thing I have to reset it every time ? So I dont believe it is that advance .

 

 

EXACTLY!...........If it really operated the way people say it does, there would be no need to reset it, it would know the oil is clean, new and not broken down, it would reset itself like the fuel gauge miles to empty does.

 

Change your oil as often as you like, it's your truck, take care of it.

 

 

Apparently you don't understand how it works. Nowhere does it state the OLM samples oil. When you reset the OLM, it's the equivalent of the fuel gauge sensing a fueling event has occurred. So you would have a system that self detects when the oil has been drained and replaced? It's far much simpler to reset it yourself.

 

The OLM does not sample or test your oil at all. Period!

 

Have a UOA performed sometime and see what a reasonable OCI is. 5k-6k is well within reason for today's vehicles and modern oils, whether dino or synthetic

 

Your last sentence is the best thing you've said in that post. Change as often as you like.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,015 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...