Jump to content

Tighten Gas Cap message


Recommended Posts

Posted


My 2004 Yukon Denali (w/6.0) has the tighten gas cap message irregularly. I bought used and was OK for 4 months them the MIL light came on. I have a scanner and the P0455 code registered.

The gas cap was not original so bought the NAPA Stand cap and put it on. Not the fix. I then used silicon spray on the first cap to allow smoother seating and made sure tight, was trouble free for a couple days then P0455 set again.I used the scanner to erase the code and I retightened it and was good for a couple days then the tighten gas cap message appeared. No code.

 


So I relented and bought the correct AC Delco cap. Same message. I then took off he vent valve solenoid assembly from evap tank and cleaned the filter and dust
from it and check the solenoid for function w/12 volts. happily I reinstalled it and it just told me to “tighten gas cap”. Hoses and lines looked good at the evap canister etc. and fuel tank fill lines.

 


Next: ??? Maybe the purge valve solenoid up front? Have a smoke test? Funny it set the codes real fast at first, then just the message.

 



Posted

Don't mean to hijack the thread, but this is sort of related. When did GM change the style of their gas cap on these trucks? My 2011 had the traditional cap that when turned to tighten would click, click, click, click, etc. On this new '13 when I turn it get one click and that's it. You could continue to turn, but no more clicks. I'm sure it's right for this truck, but in a world of un-tightened gas caps just one click kind of leaves me wanting more.....seems insufficient even though I know it's right.

Posted

 

My 2004 Yukon Denali (w/6.0) has the tighten gas cap message irregularly. I bought used and was OK for 4 months them the MIL light came on. I have a scanner and the P0455 code registered.

The gas cap was not original so bought the NAPA Stand cap and put it on. Not the fix. I then used silicon spray on the first cap to allow smoother seating and made sure tight, was trouble free for a couple days then P0455 set again.I used the scanner to erase the code and I retightened it and was good for a couple days then the tighten gas cap message appeared. No code.

 

 

So I relented and bought the correct AC Delco cap. Same message. I then took off he vent valve solenoid assembly from evap tank and cleaned the filter and dust

from it and check the solenoid for function w/12 volts. happily I reinstalled it and it just told me to “tighten gas cap”. Hoses and lines looked good at the evap canister etc. and fuel tank fill lines.

 

 

Next: ??? Maybe the purge valve solenoid up front? Have a smoke test? Funny it set the codes real fast at first, then just the message.

 

 

 

 

my problem after 2 smoke tests, replacing 2 valves turned out to be rust holes in the filler nck. the rubber hose was covering them so the smoke did not get out.

Posted

The 2004 Denali has now set the P0455 code again. I have read numerous blogs and forums relating to this and of course, they first point to the gas cap, which I am sure it is not. The purge valve, normally closed creates the vacuum for the test (besides drawing vapors into the intake) then closes (no power) for the test. The vent valve (in back) normally open (no power) closes to seal for the test when activated. I intend to test these valves on bench for function. Without dropping the tank, I can then only suspect a hose, or the pressure sensor. Next chance will pour over this again, do the tests on the solenoid valves, check all visable hoses. I may have to indulge making my own smoke tester and see how that goes. I know the factory techs probably have a shortcut or probable cause for this so wondering if anyone has this insight. I don't give up easily and am relentlessly a DIY guy. I have the manuals for this vehicle and I am using the Innova 3130c for code retrieval and erase. The $$$K scanner I do not have. Suggestions?

Posted



I will end this post with my fix to this problem.

It was the canister vent valve located at the rear of the vehicle. I took the valve off and bench tested it with a vacuum source.

 

 

Drawing through the vent tube side (to gas tank) of the valve I engaged the solenoid a dozen or more times. First only clicking of the solenoid but was still able to draw a reduced
amount of air through when energized (the leak). After working it several times and some silicon spray the valve closed on energizing and sealed. I reinstalled the
valve and drove it about 6 miles and the MIL light went off.

 

 

As I mentioned earlier the valve was very dirty and dusty when first removed. I assumed a grain of dust prevented full movement of the solenoid valve to close.

 

 

P0455 large leak: although gas cap was the message (probably the most common) it was the valve that wouldn't seat.

I will replace the valve with a new one, they're cheap enough. -oldchev :happysad:

  • 3 months later...
Posted

i had 3 cracks in my purge valve shown there, got a replacement (the cheap one without the relocation kit, it's the old suburban one) took off the valve and swapped it out, then got the light, had to replace the stupid hose shown.... used 1/2" hose didn't even need clamps it was so damn tight to get on..... still waiting after a month for the light to come back on, fingers crossed but my repair looks just like that.

  • 6 years later...
Posted

What do you do when you have replaced everything?  Thinking about replacing evap solenoid again. To see if got bad one.   Would love your thoughts. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Whoever greenlighted the work truck matte black front bumpers on every trim but the AT4X should be fired!  I was hoping that was an AI mistake, but just realized they were on every model of the 2027 Silverado too.     Some parts of the interior do look premium, but the Denali Ultimate dashboard looks like an afterthought.  At least they appear to have lost the microfiber the high end Silverado models showed, but the '27 High Country dash looks better than the Denali.  
    • New member here. I am researching a read-first event-recorder concept for late-model GM V8 trucks. This is not a sales post. There is no product link, price, preorder, or mailing list. I am trying to determine whether the underlying problem is real before building anything.   Has your truck ever had a brief problem such as: - rough running or a momentary misfire - an oil-pressure warning or unusual pressure event - reduced power or a brief stall - a U-code or lost-communication problem - a symptom that disappeared before the dealer or independent shop could reproduce it   If so, I would appreciate the following details: - year, model, engine, and mileage - what happened and under what conditions - whether a DTC and useful freeze-frame data were stored - whether the shop was able to reproduce it - what the eventual confirmed repair was, if known - what additional information would have helped the diagnosis   The concept being evaluated is a removable leave-in recorder that continuously retains a rolling window from before and after an event. It would not tune, reflash, clear codes, or change the vehicle calibration.   I am also not claiming that it could predict lifter failure or see every internal ECM variable.   The real question is whether continuous event history would add enough useful evidence beyond freeze frame, GDS2, and existing scan tools — or whether it would simply be another unnecessary gadget.   For owners and technicians, which problem would make something like this genuinely useful: 1. intermittent misfire or AFM/DFM-related behavior 2. oil-pressure events 3. lost communication or electrical faults 4. none of the above Please be blunt. Negative feedback is just as useful as positive feedback.
    • No tears over the SLE and SLT trim levels disappearing but I kind of loathe the "Elevation" name. It's a truck--skip the elegance.   The slab-dashboard design is decidedly different. Almost has a Hummer flavor to it. "Professional Grade" seems to be leaning very white-collar, tech-driven these days moreso than blue-collar, functional design.   The Silverado would be my choice between the two new trucks. Pleased with the engine lineup in both. The GMC is a little "too much" for a truck, IMO, and the Denali borders on ridiculous - but I do know there are buyers for luxury trucks out there. It's just not my speed.
    • Your safety is of utmost importance, @joshua1221, and we understand the importance of having all your lights working in your truck. If you have not already, we highly encourage you to bring your concerns to the attention of your local GM dealer. They are in the best position to diagnose your concerns as well as confirm the compatibility of the mirrors with your truck. Additionally, we would like the opportunity to explore any way we may be of assistance. When you have a moment, please visit: https://s.gm.com/support-request and fill out the support request form with all pertinent details. This form helps our team gather the right information and ensures your request is routed appropriately.
    • - I like the outside but not as much as the Chevrolet.  They ICE'd the EV styling and it works, but I think exterior goes to Chevy on this one.     - SLE and SLT dead = Not.  Surprising.  Fits into the rest of the GMC lineup like this which (aside from Pro) matches the rest of the family.  Elevation, AT4, Denali.     - Interior.  Sophisticated Malaise era.  Why do I say Malaise?  Drawn with a ruler.  Rectangles everywhere.  Looks very premium though.    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...