Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I switched from a 2003 6.0 gas 2500 to the 2014 5.3. Rough numbers with just a 5 mpg improvement show a $1,000 annual fuel savings with 15,000 miles a year. I will most likely have less miles though as we drive our other cars more.

Posted

Ok, we returned from the trip that we went on. The raw data after filling up for the above pictures 380 miles total before starting trip. The truck took 19.5 gallons and mpg worked out to 19.48 mpg on the 1st tank. Here are some pictures of the trip that had about 250 miles of mountain driving and flat land driving the rest of the way for a total of 1154 miles. So it works out this way. 1154 - 380 = 774 miles for the trip. On the trip we burned 37.5 gallons of gas for a gas mileage of 20.64 overall.

 

The best of it.

 

 

 

The part that has the most wow took place on the flat land. It was a reduce speed zone that went forever. The posted limit was 55mph and I set the cruise at 57mph. The CHP had people pull over on both sides of the freeway. In case you can't read it because the road was rough. The current mpg on the left said 28mpg. The best at 50 miles was 25.7 mpg and the avg. was 25.7 mpg

 

 

 

For the best 25 mile club went to this picture. Cruise set at 70mph. That was on flat land driving near Delano, CA on Interstate 99 going to Bakerfield, CA.

 

 

 

impressive for sure. if you don't speed with these things, they are unbelievable.

Posted

Just picked up my new truck yesterday out of state so I had a 248 mile journey home. Its a 4X4 Denali with the 6.2 and once I was outside of St. Louis rush hour traffic I was running 75 to 80 most of the way home. Figured at the pump I averaged 18.48 MPG...Display showed 18.6. I am tickled pink with these numbers on a brand new truck that had 6 miles on it when I left the lot. The motor feels tight and I can only imagine it will get better with some mileage.

Posted

I got tired of the uphill battle with my fuel economy and basically got a buy back and got the 2015 2500 denali. Getting 3mpg better than my 2014 with 3.08 gears after the first 250 miles.

 

Sent from my SGH-I337M using Tapatalk

Posted

I got tired of the uphill battle with my fuel economy and basically got a buy back and got the 2015 2500 denali. Getting 3mpg better than my 2014 with 3.08 gears after the first 250 miles.

 

Sent from my SGH-I337M using Tapatalk

When did you do that?!

Posted

Monday. It sure feels Iike a truck with the 4 or so inches higher and the stiffer ride. Got 18mpg on the drive to town this morning. Woot!

 

Don't get me wrong, I know the truck costs more and the maintenance is more. I'm not thinking this will cost me less long term, but I made a sacrifice in usability with the last truck for fuel economy and was keeping my old 2500 for heavy stuff. Now I can sell it.

 

Sent from my SGH-I337M using Tapatalk

Posted

IMG-20140423-00121_zps1af115f7.jpgI thought I would chime in and share today's mileage. Just so it's known, my commute to work from my house is 3.5 miles of dirt road to 40 miles of freeway driving to 4 miles of light to light. I have a Silverado CC SB w/ 5.3 and 3.42's. My normal average has been consistently between 20 and 22 mpg hand figured at each fill up. I have now personally put close to 9k miles on my truck, so it has seen its share of full tanks to conclude the average. Today must have been a fluke or hte truck was in a really good mood. On the way to work this morning at mile 41 of my commute, I happend to look down and see my DIC showing....Well, if I say it you probably wouldn't believe it. So, the picture should say it all....

Posted

Well...since there is another recall...I'll be letting my dealer take a look at the mileage issue early.

 

Hopefully Friday or early next week.

Posted

2nd fill up on the new truck....18.1 hand calculated with the DIC showing 18.8. This is about 80% or so highway mileage. Not to shabby for a big ole 6.2L.

Posted

Mine's about 20MPG mix of highway/city/mountains, and I'm not babying it. If I did, it'd be a bit higher.

 

5.3L

Posted (edited)

Driving my 6.2 like a grandma still didn't get the ratings others have shown here. I get my best rating at about 45 mph with almost 30 mpg. My DIC best of 25 mpg is when stuck on a very long 55 mph highway. My DIC does jump around a little bit, but has averaged out to .5 mpg above actual usages. I'm still getting about the same mpg as my old 1995 Nissan V6 pickup I've had the last 15 years, so I'm happy about that when it's mixed with all of the extra room, four doors, towing capacity, payload, 4WD, and comfort. I think if the trans would just shift gears it could get better mpg and be smoother, coming from only driving stick shifts I expect it to be positive and this frustrates a lot. Here is my records so far with a mix of trying to get the best mpg and some playing in the mountains.

 

gallery_129354_2624_9995.png

Edited by Crf450r420
Posted

I average ~20MPG, city/mountains/highway combined. Not bad for a truck this size with a 5.3L engine.

My '02 w/4.8L averaged 16MPG on the same trips.

Posted (edited)

I completed a 172 mile drive with my best gas mileage getting 23.2 on a 50 mile average. I average the whole trip at 20.4 and that is with the new 6.2 L in a crew cab 2014 Denali 4x4 doing 70 miles an hour down the interstate and in and around Nashville. That's better then my F150 eco-boost i had. Very happy so far. My lifetime average for 552 miles is 17.3. Not bad

 

 

Sent from my iPad mini using Tapatalk

Edited by dodgehemi0

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   7 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,689 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
    • I went to the county a few years back to dispute my property taxes. To do that I hired an appraiser and a lawyer. The County Assessor wished to argue that the homes in my neighborhood the appraiser used were all 'distressed properties" and not representative of the "Market Average".    My response was," Of the 50 homes in our subdivision 43 of them were "distressed properties" under bank foreclosure and as such "Distressed IS the market". Lawyer about choked on his coffee and handed the Assessor the 'receipts'.    I won that case on the evidence provided by the Lawyer and the Appraiser.    We have the same thing going on here. My statements were based on the GOVERNMENTS NATIONAL DATA and yours on local markets in areas of your interest. They are both correct....   Thing is, this divergence was based on NATIONAL and not on LOCAL. I think you even understand that. But like you said, we are both stubborn and hardheaded.    I do not see any advantage to disengagement.  But that said we can step back to compose ourselves. 
    • Trust me I appreciate the comments and concerns. It's what I was looking for to help me evaluate the situation and what I want to do. I have decided to move forward with the BORA hubcentric slip on 3/8" (.375") with the extended lugs nuts. Fedex says they should be here Monday :). Meanwhile, the dealer got the remote start and Patriot spray in bed liner done over the last couple of days. Also, I installed an inline stop/start eliminator today. Starts back up in what whatever mode you shut it off in, so you don't have to hit the button every time you fire up.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...