Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I dropped it off with the dealership this morning. The end mileage average was 1581 miles, 16.8 mpg at 95% interstate driving.I stopped the sale so it's actually their truck. I told them they could fix it, sell it,auction it, whatever I didn't really care.

Sounds about right for an LT tire. Good luck to you and them. If they/you want closer to sticker mpgs, you'll have to drop to 265/65/18 tire with more of a highway terrain.

 

Sent from Tapatalk App - Samsung S6

Posted

40 psi is way too high on the stock P rated tires, especially for the back tire. You are just asking for problems on wet roads not mention the tire wearing out way too fast in the middle.

 

 

I'm running 22" terra grappler G2's 285/45/22 - consensus was these tires like 40~45 psi... Sorry I didn't mention that.

Posted

 

 

I'm running 22" terra grappler G2's 285/45/22 - consensus was these tires like 40~45 psi... Sorry I didn't mention that.

You are right, thought you were talking about the stock P tires. Go to Toyos website and download their inflation chart and it will tell you what psi you need to run.

Posted

Thanks all for the info.

You're welcome! And good luck with your next purchase, whatever that may be.

 

And FYI, since these new tires are lighter. my MPG went up 1-1.5 on the read out, which should translate to slightly higher on a hand calculation, which leaves me around 18-19 at around 72-75 mph

 

If you're looking for gas mileage, remember to go with the stock P rates tires, as they are lighter and a lot better on MPGs

Posted (edited)

I don't know if it is these 6 speed transmissions or what but on my last truck (2002 - 4.8- 4.10 gears) I only lost about 1/2 mpg and same as my previous work trucks when going to an LT AT tire. My latest work truck is F150 and it lost 2 mpg when going to an LT tire (5.0 3.55 gears). I like the AT look but I don't really "need" an AT tire. I have been looking at the Cooper ATP's sold at Discount Tire. They are a P rated tire and I found out the weight 42 lbs in a 275/65/18. The stock 265/65/18 sra's weigh 35 lbs so hopefully it won't be too big of a hit on gas mileage when I finally get rid of these crapyears.

Edited by tnchevy
  • Like 1
Posted

I don't know if it is these 6 speed transmissions or what but on my last truck (2002 - 4.8- 4.10 gears) I only lost about 1/2 mpg and same as my previous work trucks when going to an LT AT tire. My latest work truck is F150 and it lost 2 mpg when going to an LT tire (5.0 3.55 gears). I like the AT look but I don't really "need" an AT tire. I have been looking at the Cooper ATP's sold at Discount Tire. They are a P rated tire and I found out the weight 42 lbs in a 275/65/18. The stock 265/65/18 sra's weigh 35 lbs so hopefully it won't be too big of a hit on gas mileage when I finally get rid of these crapyears.

 

My first tire change was from the GY 265/65/18 to Cooper ATP 275/65/18. It was about a 1mpg hit.

Posted

My 275/70/18s are at like 55 lbs. So they are very different from the stockers but they still are not bad at all for being a 10 ply
My 285s were 65+lbs...

Posted

 

My first tire change was from the GY 265/65/18 to Cooper ATP 275/65/18. It was about a 1mpg hit.

Is that after you account for the 3% size difference? I was hoping for 1/2 mpg hit with those tires but glad you chimed in, probably will end up getting them anyway. They are about the only P rated AT tire that I like the looks of. I also really liked the AT3's I had on my 2002 model and the ATP's look very similar. The downside is that the nearest DiscounTire is 2 hours from me.

Posted

Is that after you account for the 3% size difference? I was hoping for 1/2 mpg hit with those tires but glad you chimed in, probably will end up getting them anyway. They are about the only P rated AT tire that I like the looks of. I also really liked the AT3's I had on my 2002 model and the ATP's look very similar. The downside is that the nearest DiscounTire is 2 hours from me.

 

I drive mostly city though, I bet you get better highway.

 

Order them from DTD and then have a local shop put them on.

  • Like 1
Posted

I will never go the mail route again with tires. I did that with a set of Nitto Terra Grapplers through discounttire and 3 out of 4 of them were pretty bad out of round. Had to have them road force balanced with a lot of weight.

Posted

I'm running 22" terra grappler G2's 285/45/22 - consensus was these tires like 40~45 psi... Sorry I didn't mention that.

most p ratted tire have a max psi cold around 40 to 44 so yes 40 is fine
Posted

So the other day (and in the wrong thread) some people were talking about MPG loss due to "winter mix" fuel. Not sure the validity of this but I have noticed a 2 MPG drop over the last month or so. Well yesterday I bought Mobil gas and I noticed today my mileage is back up to mid 17's where it used to be...

 

Does anyone know if different companies use different additives/winter blends etc...? I know they all say their formula is the best and I remember reading a study that Shell had the "best gas" but what do you all think? Or was I just driving like a masshole for the past month...?

Posted

Winter blend does in fact lower your MPG...but also keep in mind that lower outside temperature, remote start etc will also have an effect on it. And yes to my knowledge they all use a slightly different formulation of winter gas.

 

Not 100% about in the US but in Canada Shell is the only station to offer ethanol free gasoline which will raise your MPG, since ethanol burns faster than gasoline.

  • Like 1
Posted

This was taken last week when I filled up. So far I have put this many miles on the truck. Hopefully it stays like this. We will see.

 

20151207_161200_zpsonvtzqrk.jpg

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...