Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yeah its not the fastest but I came from an 09 manual gt and I still feel like this is a bit quicker. Really want to go to 3.73s or 4.10s but want to find a setup that isn't whiny/noisy. Y'all know of any?

I personally like Richmond... I have set 100's of them up with ZERO issues.

 

RT

Posted (edited)

I personally like Richmond... I have set 100's of them up with ZERO issues.

 

RT

Thanks bro. Sorry but do you know what rear end these trucks have. Im about to google richmond Edited by Slo281
Posted

Here's my mileage for the year. Calculated at every fillup. No cherry picking 5 mile down hill coasting. :drool:

With the exception of the initial tank of 87 and two tanks of 87 when I had to fillup with out corn juice nearby, every tank has been E85.

 

(google drive link...)

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hMS7q555NoW6MTXWyWI9ckqCsP0PD6sHvBrrCdbQZpc/edit?usp=sharing

Wow, dipping down into the 10's. Mines still pretty new (2014 dbl cab, 4wd, 3.08). First 4 tanks of 87 I averaged 15.5. My last 4 tanks of E85 I've averaged 13.6.

Posted

Gathered this info when I was looking to trade in my 2005 for a 2014 and noticed most on the lots had 3.08's. My 2005 w/ 3.42's always felt strong pulling my ~4000lb 18.5' boat so I wanted to make sure I was getting something I felt was going to be similar. The 6 speed with 3.08 gears of my 2014 is better in every gear vs the 4 speed with 3.42 gears that was in my 2005. I added larger tires on both so you can see the real ratio with those.

 

6 speed (265/70R17, 31.6")

1st: 4.03 x 3.08 = 12.41

2nd: 2.36 x 3.08 = 7.27

3rd: 1.53 x 3.08 = 4.71

4th: 1.15 x 3.08 = 3.54

5th: .85 x 3.08 = 2.62

6th: .67 x 3.08 = 2.06

 

6 speed (285/70R17, 32.7")

1st: 4.03 x 2.98 = 12.00

2nd: 2.36 x 2.98 = 7.032

3rd: 1.53 x 2.98 = 4.559

4th: 1.15 x 2.98 = 3.427

5th: .85 x 2.98 = 2.533

6th: .67 x 2.98 = 1.996

 

4 speed (265/70R17, 31.6")

1st: 3.06 x 3.42 = 10.465

2nd: 1.75 x 3.42 = 5.985

3rd: 1.00 x 3.42 = 3.42

4th: .70 x 3.42 = 2.394

 

4 speed (285/70R17, 32.7")

1st: 3.06 x 3.3 = 10.098

2nd: 1.75 x 3.3 = 5.775

3rd: 1.00 x 3.3 = 3.3

4th: .70 x 3.3 = 2.31

 

Pretty interesting data to me.

Posted

Last fuelly fill up 19.9 mix of city and highway on 93

You must live somewhere warm.

  • Like 1
Posted

Fall and winter on winter blend 87 octane. 5.3 w/3.42. Michigan weather. Pic taken last night.

post-130182-0-05688200-1422008490_thumb.jpeg

post-130182-0-05688200-1422008490_thumb.jpeg

post-130182-0-05688200-1422008490_thumb.jpeg

post-130182-0-05688200-1422008490_thumb.jpeg

Posted

18.3 average over 28k miles January 2014 to January 2015. I have some tanks where the average is very good and then when I hook up my enclosed trailer/do a lot of off roading and idling on the farm the average goes way down. If I were using this full size 4x4 truck simply as a car I think that 21 average would be very easily attainable.

  • Like 1
Posted

18.3 average over 28k miles January 2014 to January 2015. I have some tanks where the average is very good and then when I hook up my enclosed trailer/do a lot of off roading and idling on the farm the average goes way down. If I were using this full size 4x4 truck simply as a car I think that 21 average would be very easily attainable.

If I was using mine as just a car, pretty sure mine would be in the 23-24 MPG average range on summer blend. Some tanks it is.

 

My best tank MPG so far was 26.3 MPG, my worst was 17 MPG last winter.

 

I still have one of my old trucks in the barn that gets used for the odd jobs and some of the dirty work on the property. She's 22 and I just can't get rid of the old girl. Even though others have come and gone. Don't tell anyone, but it's a Furd.

Posted

post-125185-0-72650200-1422164602_thumb.pngpost-125185-0-74591500-1422164614_thumb.png

 

5.3 4x4 3.42 with small lift and 34" tires, pretty happy with 20mpg overall for the first 37K miles. The OnStar app says 21, but it rounds up; the actual number is 20 point something, and the truck computer is a bit high (measured mileage at the pump is about 1/2 mpg lower than the truck says), so 20 is realistic. For those wondering about the displayed recommended tire pressures, that's what I had the dealer program in to the truck's BCM during one of the software upgrades. I picked low numbers so I wouldn't get nuisance lights during the winter when the tire pressure naturally drops. I actually run the pressures shown with an empty bed, load range E Toyo all-terrains.

post-125185-0-72650200-1422164602_thumb.png

post-125185-0-74591500-1422164614_thumb.png

post-125185-0-72650200-1422164602_thumb.png

post-125185-0-74591500-1422164614_thumb.png

post-125185-0-72650200-1422164602_thumb.png

post-125185-0-74591500-1422164614_thumb.png

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

Did a trip from Columbus Ohio to the Chicago west suburbs earlier this week. Between Columbus and Indy, I got around 17-18 mpg, but there was a pretty decent crosswind.

 

Got some pretty good mileage between Indy and home driving between 70-75mph,. using 89 octane from a Shell Station on the east side of Indy. I was impressed, I might have been able to get close to 500 miles on the tank if I had to keep going at that rate. Not bad for winter gas, and about 20-25 degrees outside, plus I was hauling about 300 lbs of extra weight in the back of work stuff. Not to mention i had TONS of ice and snow frozen to my truck from my driving through winter storm Juno on my way to Columbus a few days before, so I wasn't as aerodynamic as normal.

 

Also I have AFM turned off via Blackbear tune. So the truck was in V8 mode the entire time. Also happy to report my new Corsa muffler was not annoying at all at highway speeds, sounds perfect.

 

These were taken about 10 miles from home. My 400 mile best actually went up to 19.2 by the time I was home. Forgot to snap a pic.

15dc8851f62add35aec924caf979e243.jpg3b08f5b1e1aa67ef840b42e8b0e60fcd.jpg78e69664b55a9fd38769b05575e5dede.jpg0c7114dcd277fc67e70c5f8492995cbd.jpga186ae3e840fb10e1391e5548f203089.jpg




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by fondupot
Posted

You guys are getting some great fuel economy. For you guys with 15-30k on the trucks did it start out that good or slowly increase as you put more miles on the truck?

Posted

You guys are getting some great fuel economy. For you guys with 15-30k on the trucks did it start out that good or slowly increase as you put more miles on the truck?

 

 

mine has 15K and it slowly went up for me.

Posted

You guys are getting some great fuel economy. For you guys with 15-30k on the trucks did it start out that good or slowly increase as you put more miles on the truck?

 

Hard to say. I haven't taken many road trips in my truck. Most of my driving is around town. But generally i get 16-17 around town. and 20-22 on the highway.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,902
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Newest Member
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 279 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • are there any codes? with lots of rust, perhaps disconnect/clean both sides of the connection/examine cable ends (the wires) for corrosion going into the sheath & replace if necessary/reconnect ALL the power AND ground cables between the battery, engine, frame, cab, fuse box and starter charm.li (website) has a no-start diagnostic procedure you can work through to get it working.
    • Its no wonder you've gravitated to the oil types and brands you have in later years after trying certain brands and one being a specialty oil or at least very hard to come by up here and the other would have been a commonly found oil of the era and the vastly different outcomes as a result to using the vehicles in question the same distance for an OCI . It shows what marketing hype can do without actually having the product to back up the claims and that is no different now with the insane claims that are written on the side of a bottle of oil from some of the off the shelf oils.    What has surprised me and I was already finding this out before I bought my truck with the GDI engine, that this newer fancy technology that seemingly would suggest better fuel economy/emissions with this high pressure spray of fuel is not in reality kind at all to the engine or at least the oils life. Yet they insist on claiming long OCI with this technology just like they did with the port or similar type fuel injection systems when in reality its a step back in oil life to have a GDI system.    I think the mistake your making Grumpy is that your not sending your samples to Blackstone and getting the feel good glowing report that you can run it another 1000 or more miles and then send another sample where they say run it yet another 1000 miles and on and on it goes until your sending in something that looks a lot like road tar and then they may suggest you change your oil within the next 1000 miles 😆
    • I am guessing that engines of that design back then had a better ability to be abused and survive longer than a new design engine with the long timing chain and the overhead cams and phasers etc. But I would never guess that an engine could go that far and not fail spectacularly or at least die a slow death. 
    • In the 80's 90's I'd run Honda's 7,500 miles between changes using Red Line HP 5W20 and do it for hundreds of thousands of miles with issues. Back in the day it was an SAE 20 with the HTHS of a SAE 30 and SN add load. It was also very polar. Oxidation VOA was over 120. Besides those motors were SPFI and lean burn tech. I could have likely run it longer but never did.    We had a Toyota bought new I ran on Pennzoil's latest and greatest synthetic of the day with "Penthane". A made up word for a very low dose of PAO. Tried 7,500 mile OCI's in that Group III/VI chemistry and the rings tapped out at 90K. Rocker box wasn't as bad as the one Punch put up but it wasn't good either. Also a SPFI motor.    I'm around 3,750 across the board on these GDI monsters and the oil it tapped out by then usually on TBN/TAN crossover and color. Red Line HP Euro.    The AMSOIL SS brochures tell you to follow the OEM values for the service class but that it can be run up to 25K if monitored. I can't imagine what motor could go that distance and not tap out. I've never owned one.    Yes, I know. Lot's of people do. I'm just not going to be one of them. 
    • I knew a guy in the early 80's that bought a new Monte Carlo and ran it a 100,000 miles without ever changing the filter or the oil. Just kept adding. It looked like that inside.     
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...