Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

295/55r20 Toyo AT2 Xtreme on Stock 20's, RC 2/5" Lift/Level. Truck is still under 1000km.

20150208_100453_zpsrhdqxaee.jpg

I haven't re-calibrated my speedo so the mileage should actually be a little better than what's displayed. I average 80% highway, 20% city.

2015-02-12%2013.02.07_zpscqa6hztm.png



According to my calculations... I'm displaying about 3.4% too slow, so that averages me approx. 19.3L/100km or 12mpg!
I'm surprised how horrible the fuel economy is, anyone notice an improvement as they got more miles on the truck?


Edited by hutch08
Posted

295/55r20 Toyo AT2 Xtreme on Stock 20's, RC 2/5" Lift/Level. Truck is still under 1000km.

 

20150208_100453_zpsrhdqxaee.jpg

 

I haven't re-calibrated my speedo so the mileage should actually be a little better than what's displayed. I average 80% highway, 20% city.

 

2015-02-12%2013.02.07_zpscqa6hztm.png

 

 

 

According to my calculations... I'm displaying about 3.4% too slow, so that averages me approx. 19.3L/100km or 12mpg!

I'm surprised how horrible the fuel economy is, anyone notice an improvement as they got more miles on the truck?

 

 

 

 

 

 

I saw a slow improvement as I got more miles on mine. I have only seen ppl go that far down in milage with MT tires at that size. Could the low milage also be because it is so cold where you are?

Posted

 

 

 

I saw a slow improvement as I got more miles on mine. I have only seen ppl go that far down in milage with MT tires at that size. Could the low milage also be because it is so cold where you are?

Quite possibly... temps are well below 0*C here, even dipping below -25 on occasion. That's below -10*F for you U.S folks. The cold weather in general combined with idle/warm-up time definitely does help.

Posted

Quite possibly... temps are well below 0*C here, even dipping below -25 on occasion. That's below -10*F for you U.S folks. The cold weather in general combined with idle/warm-up time definitely does help.

 

I know I personally can't stand the cold. I'll remote start the truck a few minutes ahead of time if it's even just 40-50*F outside. If itwere as cold here as it is inup north or even Canada, I think I'd go on vacation till winter was over [emoji16]

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I've put in E85 for the last three tanks and looks like I get between 10 - 11mpgs in this weather (-9 Fahrenheit this morning)

Posted

Winter has is upon us and my increased "warm up" time and crap fuel has killed mileage lately.

 

When I do take a road trip back home to MA (about a 2hr ride), I prefer to use 93 octane as I feel I yield better MPG. Typically I run 87 octane in town as that's 90% of my driving.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone

  • Like 1
Posted

I just noticed on a drive tonight that the engine would not go into V4 mode until the operating temp reached 210. It may say that in the manual or may be common knowledge but I never knew that. May actually explain some of the loss experienced during cold weather. It took my truck forever to warm up 2 degrees outside.

Posted

I just noticed on a drive tonight that the engine would not go into V4 mode until the operating temp reached 210. It may say that in the manual or may be common knowledge but I never knew that. May actually explain some of the loss experienced during cold weather. It took my truck forever to warm up 2 degrees outside.

My 08 does that too... Took it quite a while to switch into that tonight considering it's about 0F there tonight..going down to -8F.

Posted (edited)

I just noticed on a drive tonight that the engine would not go into V4 mode until the operating temp reached 210. It may say that in the manual or may be common knowledge but I never knew that. May actually explain some of the loss experienced during cold weather. It took my truck forever to warm up 2 degrees outside.

It's actually waiting for your tranny fluid to get up to temp. The colder it is outside, the higher your tranny fluid temp needs to be. On mine in extreme cold 0ºishF it needs to be above 113ºF. That can take 8-10 miles some times. This is my second winter, and if the air temp is around 32ºF, it might switch around 95ºF on the tranny fluid temp. There is a definite correlation between the two temps.

 

In the summer, mine will switch as soon as I get into 3rd gear and above 15 MPH. The tranny fluid is already warm enough, and the engine is no where near 210ºF yet.

Edited by Ventilator
  • Like 1
Posted

It's actually waiting for your tranny fluid to get up to temp. The colder it is outside, the higher your tranny fluid temp needs to be. On mine in extreme cold 0ºishF it needs to be above 113ºF. That can take 8-10 miles some times. This is my second winter, and if the air temp is around 32ºF, it might switch around 95ºF on the tranny fluid temp. There is a definite correlation between the two temps.

In the summer, mine will switch as soon as I get into 3rd gear and above 15 MPH. The tranny fluid is already warm enough, and the engine is no where near 210ºF yet.

 

Yeah I just noticed that again, I put my truck back in the garage and went for a drive and it was immediately going into V4 mode so I guess the garage keeps the fluid warm enough to instantly allow V4 more.......one more reason to keep em in the garage.

Posted

I know I've increased idle time in this weather. The darn remote starter needs to be able to just start the truck when you push the button no matter how many times you push it - two starts for 10 minutes each just doesn't come close to cutting it in this weather.

 

Either they should not limit it to two remote starts or they should've made the truck so it warms up sooner - a lot sooner. Seems like it takes this engine about three times longer to warm up than my old 2000 S-10 and 2003 Trail Blazer.

Posted

Yeah I just noticed that again, I put my truck back in the garage and went for a drive and it was immediately going into V4 mode so I guess the garage keeps the fluid warm enough to instantly allow V4 more.......one more reason to keep em in the garage.

 

 

Yes, the garage definitely helps.

Posted

I know I've increased idle time in this weather. The darn remote starter needs to be able to just start the truck when you push the button no matter how many times you push it - two starts for 10 minutes each just doesn't come close to cutting it in this weather.

 

Either they should not limit it to two remote starts or they should've made the truck so it warms up sooner - a lot sooner. Seems like it takes this engine about three times longer to warm up than my old 2000 S-10 and 2003 Trail Blazer.

All Aluminium Engine sheds heat very quick.

 

RT

Posted

Avg 19.5 MPG with true dual exhaust, CAI (Airaid), factory tires (soon to be upgraded to Michelins), 28k miles and 93 octane with 60-80 deg temps. 87 octane, below 60 deg temps and mileage goes down to 14-16MPG. Pulling horse trailer......11-12 MPG. Every once in awhile I'll get a good load of fuel and MPG will avg 22 for that tank. Driving 3 hours at 80 mph on freeway from Dallas after duals were installed I hit a "Best" of 26.1 MPG!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,863
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Bulldogger
    Newest Member
    Bulldogger
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 1 Anonymous, 836 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks, so being a different beast altogether, anyone know what the "optimal" temp is for the 10L80/90 for proper shifting?
    • How many years have I pointed out every point in that link to the folks here and been avalanched with criticisms and outright hostilities at times? I ran counter to even the great CUSTOMBOSS and Lake Speed Jr and the half dozen experts on YouTube and in the final.....GM, Physics (Stribeck) backs that Grumpy old Bear.    Honestly, I never said a thing engineering hadn't studied silly and laid in concrete during WWII. But I'm old, the information is old and yet, the Laws of Physics are eternal.    Okay there is one exception. I vehemently disagree with their use of the word 'tolerances' when what it meant is "clearance".   The clearance is the distance between two objects. The tolerance is the degree of acceptable variation permitted in that clearance. I.E., piston to bore clearance is 0.004" with a tolerance of +/- .0002" so the clearance is in specification if it lies between 0.0038" and 0.0042". Cutting that 'tolerance in half has ZERO impact on lubrication requirements. Makes for more difficulty in manufacturing.  But a tighter clearance 'MAY'. Depends on finish. Anyway....   It's one of those statements made by people to make themselves look smarter than they are to convince people who are as un-enlighten as they seem to manipulate their behaviors. But hey, the blind leading the blind puts them both in the pit. 
    • Out and about yesterday on a long Saturday drive I passed a lot of Shell stations. My preferred, so I pay attention. Lot's of small town Illinois so not six stations in three blocks like the city.    Everyone of them over a radius of say 100 miles had regular at $4.19 but one which was the one closest to home at $4.15. However Premium pricing varied greatly between 85 cents over regular to $1.50 over. I'm not counting the price of the station with the lowest regular so the reference is the same for the remainder and all within the same brand. However the spread discrepancy holds across all brands.     @txab, any thoughts on that? 
    • What are your thoughts? The Chevy Blazer relaunch was an epic case of 'lunchbag letdown'. Jeep Wranglers and Ford Broncos stick out like a sore thumb.    The AI photos do not look like a 'retro version', but shrunken Tahoes. Get away from the 'futuristic look'. I've seen two concepts. One had rectangular headlight like a Rivian and the other way to big should include dual round headlights like the early version.   If not this would look OK   At least it has GM styling (albeit the K2XX) A lot of the images floating around look like Bronco IIs or the current Bronco. Looking at the Broncos in my area (central Ontario, it seems to be a mix of 2 doors and 4 doors, 'mall rated' to ones that could go offroad.    I'm sure a AT4 and AT4X RPOs could be outfitted similar to a Rubicon if the braintrust understood the whole offroad scene. Crosing my fingers that if it does see the light that the front air dam/bumper doesn't extend below the center line of the tire...      
    • I saw this news earlier this year:   https://theautowire.com/2026/06/12/gm-kills-off-chevys-biggest-silverado-trucks-as-sales-collapse-and-factory-fallout-spreads/
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...