Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

You could always go with the Rancho quick lifts

 

and get the roughest ride ever...had them...never again.

 

Whether you use spacers or super stiff strut (aka Bilstein), you are standing your truck up on it's tippy toes. With spacers, when your front strut flexes, it's doing it with stock spring (or strut) tension, so I find the ride just like stock, except if you hit the top or bottom stops, then it's jarring. I don't have Bilsteins, but since they achieve their lift via increased spring tension, they are going to ride rough.....just like my Rancho Quick Lifts did.

 

Do what you want with your money, but why spend hundreds, if not thousands (ie ICON) just to achieve 2.5"?? Put some spacers in and call it a day. Save your money for a truck lift or tires/rims.

Posted

 

and get the roughest ride ever...had them...never again.

 

Whether you use spacers or super stiff strut (aka Bilstein), you are standing your truck up on it's tippy toes. With spacers, when your front strut flexes, it's doing it with stock spring (or strut) tension, so I find the ride just like stock, except if you hit the top or bottom stops, then it's jarring. I don't have Bilsteins, but since they achieve their lift via increased spring tension, they are going to ride rough.....just like my Rancho Quick Lifts did.

 

Do what you want with your money, but why spend hundreds, if not thousands (ie ICON) just to achieve 2.5"?? Put some spacers in and call it a day. Save your money for a truck lift or tires/rims.

Exactly [emoji1303]

 

 

Sent from my treestand using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

 

and get the roughest ride ever...had them...never again.

 

Whether you use spacers or super stiff strut (aka Bilstein), you are standing your truck up on it's tippy toes. With spacers, when your front strut flexes, it's doing it with stock spring (or strut) tension, so I find the ride just like stock, except if you hit the top or bottom stops, then it's jarring. I don't have Bilsteins, but since they achieve their lift via increased spring tension, they are going to ride rough.....just like my Rancho Quick Lifts did.

 

Do what you want with your money, but why spend hundreds, if not thousands (ie ICON) just to achieve 2.5"?? Put some spacers in and call it a day. Save your money for a truck lift or tires/rims.

 

FWIW the ranchos come with their own sets of springs. Finally found Spurshot's post on the matter. Fact of the matter is without spending money on a proper lift the ride is going to change and even then it's going to change for better or worse will be up to the driver to decide. Problem is it's hard to take the preference/perspective of anyone else because we're doing this for our own personal trucks and it's not like most of us want to buy both just to figure it out. My bilsteins are stiffer than my ranchos that came on the truck but they're considerably more stable and nowhere near as bouncy. I like this thus prefer my Bilsteins. They especially are more comfortable off road when going down turn roads on the farm i'm not bouncing everywhere.

 

 

The lower spacer is limited in thickness by the clearance/interference of the attaching bolt/nut with the axle (on 4wd trucks). Otherwise, there is no functional difference whether the spacer is on top of the coil over shock assembly or the bottom.

Bilsteins do not "pre-load" the spring any more than a stock shock assembly, when the truck is setting on the ground. It's a misconception. Think about it. Any stiffness increase from installing a Bilstein 5100 at its highest setting is from the increased angle of the A-arms which effectively reduce the mechanical leverage of the A-arm acting on the coil over assembly. A spacer will cause the same condition for the same lift.

Your biggest concern with "leveling" should be running into the limit of travel on the upper ball joint. That puts you into either limiting the lift or replacing the upper control arms with revised ball joint angles.

 

 

 

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/168768-leveling-bilsteins-vs-lift-kit/?p=1563456

Edited by 5RWill
Posted

 

and get the roughest ride ever...had them...never again.

 

Whether you use spacers or super stiff strut (aka Bilstein), you are standing your truck up on it's tippy toes. With spacers, when your front strut flexes, it's doing it with stock spring (or strut) tension, so I find the ride just like stock, except if you hit the top or bottom stops, then it's jarring. I don't have Bilsteins, but since they achieve their lift via increased spring tension, they are going to ride rough.....just like my Rancho Quick Lifts did.

 

Do what you want with your money, but why spend hundreds, if not thousands (ie ICON) just to achieve 2.5"?? Put some spacers in and call it a day. Save your money for a truck lift or tires/rims.

Oh I don't use them... I have the 2" RC level and it rides just fine.

Just offering something else that would give that amount of lift...

That's all!

Posted

This can be done with no problem. I ran that size tire on my 2 inch rc level before I lifted my truck. Most you will have to do is tie back the fender liner. There are plenty of examples of this set up in this thread. I still have pics of mine in my gallery.

 

looks good. HOW do you like the westin pro traxx ??? I thinking 4" ones . Thanks

Posted

 

Finally found Spurshot's post on the matter.

 

His post makes no sense and is counter to the Billstein webpage. He says stiffness comes from the "increased angle of the A-arms" ???

 

Per Bilstein:

"The lift on the 5100 Series leveling shocks is achieved by increasing the preload on the factory coil." <---in other words -- STIFFER.

 

There is a factory distance from the top of the strut mount to the bottom mount on the A-arm. Anything you do to increase that distance is going to change the ride.

 

Increase it with spacers -- you limit travel, so when you go over a speed bump or a pothole, your suspension bottoms out on the stops before it would normally than stock. Otherwise, during normal driving, the ride is stock....it has to be because you haven't changed the stiffness of the original strut.

 

Increase it with a replacement strut, like a Bilstein, you don't lose as much travel, but the truck weighs the same and the Bilstein is only .5" longer than the factory strut, so any lift above 1" (.5" longer strut = 1" of lift) is achieved by a stiffer strut than stock. That has to result in a stiffer ride than stock; there is no getting around that. In fact, the Bilstein, by being .5 to .75 longer than stock, has some of the same characteristics of a small spacer.

 

My Z71 struts are pretty stiff, so with a RC level kit, I've maintained my stock ride for 95% of the places I drive. The last thing I want is for a stiffer ride and less lift for a lot more money, not only in parts, but in labor.

 

This post isn't intended to bash the Billy Lovers....just to give folks new to trucks some perspective.

Posted (edited)

The way i understood it was that he was saying preload is a misnomer. How is the truck lifted once the strut is put into place? It isn't the length of the shock it's the spring perch and the spring. Hence the simple fact that you can get the 5100s and have no lift at all. The spring displaces the same due to the exact same force of the truck weighing down on the spring with the same spring constant that is representative of said spring. The spring that has been preloaded lifts the truck and the only load is that of the truck, that is now lifted. If the spring remained compressed (as it were before put in the truck) there would be no lift. The spring constant doesn't change because the perch is moved up.

 

This is how i had interpreted at least. Or maybe my interpretation of pre-load is just off.

 

http://www.zoomsquared.com/technical-information/coilover-spring-preload-explained

 

The ride is more stiff but so are the spacer kits i've ridden in. No truck leveled i've ridden in road as it did before the lift. That includes two RC leveled truck, one coil spring spacer leveled Ram, and my truck with the bilsteins.

 

And no worries the bilstein guys like bilsteins, RC guys like RCs, and hell if you can afford it i'm sure the Icon/Fox guys like their stuff. They all accomplish what most are wanting: a better looking truck.

 

I wish i could test my z71 struts to verify them against some standard because mine felt bouncy as hell. Like cross a railroad track and your jumping in the seat and the bed is swaying everywhere.

Edited by 5RWill
Posted (edited)

Alright. Did 5100s on top setting. Noticeably stiffer coil on shitty road. SoCal highways are just bouncy the entire way. You feel it. 3rd setting from bottom, softer ride on same roads, but still too much more my liking. Mind you, I'm running KO2s for both settings. Went back to ranchos with readylift 2.25 and noticed an improved ride. Didn't feel like the dash was going to fall apart.

 

I will say I liked the bilsteins for the composure they provided. The ranchos definitely drop off over a speed bump and things of that nature whereas the bilsteins kept the wheels planted. But the crappy SoCal roads just made for a jarring ride. I'm sure the bilstein at stock Height with spacers would be the best bet. My plan is 5100 stock setting with the 1.5" on top spacer.

 

I also want to note that bilsteins at third setting (1.25") looked really good for leveling and I could barely notice the difference in appearance from highest setting. In my opinion, 1.5" is plenty fine for a level. If you say it's not level after a 1.5" level, it's probably because you know it's not the standard 2".

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by g.mando1
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

The way i understood it was that he was saying preload is a misnomer. How is the truck lifted once the strut is put into place? It isn't the length of the shock it's the spring perch and the spring. Hence the simple fact that you can get the 5100s and have no lift at all. The spring displaces the same due to the exact same force of the truck weighing down on the spring with the same spring constant that is representative of said spring. The spring that has been preloaded lifts the truck and the only load is that of the truck, that is now lifted. If the spring remained compressed (as it were before put in the truck) there would be no lift. The spring constant doesn't change because the perch is moved up.

Yes, by moving the perch up you are simply lengthening the strut by moving up the position of the spring.

 

I'm sure the bilstein at stock Height with spacers would be the best bet. My plan is 5100 stock setting with the 1.5" on top spacer.

A popular four-wheel drive shop I called said the same thing. I have gone with 1.5" bottom spacers and will replace the shocks if the need arises.

Edited by Donstar
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Alright. Did 5100s on top setting. Noticeably stiffer coil on shitty road. SoCal highways are just bouncy the entire way. You feel it. 3rd setting from bottom, softer ride on same roads, but still too much more my liking. Mind you, I'm running KO2s for both settings. Went back to ranchos with readylift 2.25 and noticed an improved ride. Didn't feel like the dash was going to fall apart.

 

I will say I liked the bilsteins for the composure they provided. The ranchos definitely drop off over a speed bump and things of that nature whereas the bilsteins kept the wheels planted. But the crappy SoCal roads just made for a jarring ride. I'm sure the bilstein at stock Height with spacers would be the best bet. My plan is 5100 stock setting with the 1.5" on top spacer.

 

I also want to note that bilsteins at third setting (1.25") looked really good for leveling and I could barely notice the difference in appearance from highest setting. In my opinion, 1.5" is plenty fine for a level. If you say it's not level after a 1.5" level, it's probably because you know it's not the standard 2".

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Guess I'm just used to mine. It's just not that rough to me, i'm also running stock tires still so maybe my opinion changes vastly after i get new tires and rims. My dads F250 is what I would describe as rough. Thing is freaking miserable. You do feel small bumps in the road with the Bilsteins but I love mine on the farm if I feel like hitting the back roads and having a little fun. Much more so than my ranchos. Though I never used my ranchos with spacers. Of the two I tried on previous model trucks i didn't really like. Different strokes for different folks as they say.

 

So you got rid of your Bilsteins and went back to ranchos rather than lowering the Bilsteins and using spacers with them?

Edited by 5RWill
Posted

What's up everybody newbie here. Does anyone know what set up would ride better as far as comfort, 2.5" front level with 5100s on lowest setting or 2" front level with 5100s on second setting which would be roughly 2.6"? Thanks in advance

Posted

What's up everybody newbie here. Does anyone know what set up would ride better as far as comfort, 2.5" front level with 5100s on lowest setting or 2" front level with 5100s on second setting which would be roughly 2.6"? Thanks in advance

 

The mid setting is 1.25" of lift I believe, so paired with the 2" would give you 3.25"....I wondered about this set up but with a diff drop and new UCAs. Otherwise you're angles would be horrible....

  • Like 1
Posted

The mid setting is 1.25" of lift I believe, so paired with the 2" would give you 3.25"....I wondered about this set up but with a diff drop and new UCAs. Otherwise you're angles would be horrible....

Yeah that would be too much I don't want anything higher than 2.5". I think I'm gonna run the 2.5" level with the shocks on stock setting for maximin comfort I think

Posted

I was fine with the 1.25 setting, except I didn't like the skipping ride on the highway. The cracks in the rode in the city didn't bother me. It was the jarring highway ride. I put the ranchos on based on the recommendations of the shop. The owner was familiar with the I-8 near glam is and said his 15 Silverado rode well with stock ranchos and an rc level. I believe a lot has to do with the coil spring preload.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,497 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • I have 2 choices. 
    • Do you have access to BP fuels? Some stations have Silver 91 E-0 priced the same as their 93 E-10.  There is a local Marathon with 90 alky free for $6 a gallon but I go down the road to BP for $5-ish. They also have a 100 E-0 but that stuff is $10 a pop. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...