Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I took it off on my Silverado, didn't really notice much MPG difference around town, MAYBE a mpg or less on the highway MAYBE... I've thought about putting it back on since my new job has me putting about 15-20k miles on the truck for work and I am paid by the mile for gas but, it looks so much better w/o the valiance I'm hard pressed to do it.

Posted

In my opinion, I think the trucks look 10x better without the aridam. Should be the first free visual mod you make to your truck. Second comes a level, third tires, fourth window tint to fix the almost clear front windows. 

 

Here is my truck with airdam removed.

 

3eKKMLa.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, Robert Sutton said:

In my opinion, I think the trucks look 10x better without the aridam. Should be the first free visual mod you make to your truck. Second comes a level, third tires, fourth window tint to fix the almost clear front windows. 

 

Here is my truck with airdam removed.

 

3eKKMLa.jpg

Spot on with the order in which to do the mods! You have a 2" level? What tires are you running?

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, '17 Sierra said:

Spot on with the order in which to do the mods! You have a 2" level? What tires are you running?

2in level in the front to fix that horrific rake. I am rocking 275/65/r20 BFG KO2's. They measure in at 34in, slight rub at full lock at the rear end of the front wheel wells. I zip tied the felt liner back into the frame and this resolved all rubbing problems 100%.

 

I will add 1 more cheap cosmetic mod i highly recommend for looks. Something that should come stock! A REAR WHEEL WELL LINER! I do not understand why these come without one, seeing the bed color in the rear wheel well looks bad in my opinion. I bought some cheap plastic ones online that just punched right in. Looks so much better I think. I have quite a few more cosmetic changes I have not listed. Here is a side shot of the truck. 

 

gbFtCpH.jpg

 

and a day one photo i took of it stock. 

 

wDn8SuQ.jpg

 

Edited by Robert Sutton
Posted
1 hour ago, Robert Sutton said:

2in level in the front to fix that horrific rake. I am rocking 275/65/r20 BFG KO2's. They measure in at 34in, slight rub at full lock at the rear end of the front wheel wells. I zip tied the felt liner back into the frame and this resolved all rubbing problems 100%.

 

I will add 1 more cheap cosmetic mod i highly recommend for looks. Something that should come stock! A REAR WHEEL WELL LINER! I do not understand why these come without one, seeing the bed color in the rear wheel well looks bad in my opinion. I bought some cheap plastic ones online that just punched right in. Looks so much better I think. I have quite a few more cosmetic changes I have not listed. Here is a side shot of the truck. 

 

gbFtCpH.jpg

 

and a day one photo i took of it stock. 

 

wDn8SuQ.jpg

 

Looks good. My '17 came stock with the rear liners...at least I think they're on there. I also did a 2" level and probably will not go higher either. I do want to change tires soon though and I've always liked the KO2's. 

Posted
Just now, '17 Sierra said:

Looks good. My '17 came stock with the rear liners...at least I think they're on there. I also did a 2" level and probably will not go higher either. I do want to change tires soon though and I've always liked the KO2's. 

The KO2's are proven tires and look great. No regrets at all there on that purchase. 

Posted
20 hours ago, Robert Sutton said:

2in level in the front to fix that horrific rake. I am rocking 275/65/r20 BFG KO2's. They measure in at 34in, slight rub at full lock at the rear end of the front wheel wells. I zip tied the felt liner back into the frame and this resolved all rubbing problems 100%.

 

I will add 1 more cheap cosmetic mod i highly recommend for looks. Something that should come stock! A REAR WHEEL WELL LINER! I do not understand why these come without one, seeing the bed color in the rear wheel well looks bad in my opinion. I bought some cheap plastic ones online that just punched right in. Looks so much better I think. I have quite a few more cosmetic changes I have not listed. Here is a side shot of the truck. 

 

gbFtCpH.jpg

 

and a day one photo i took of it stock. 

 

wDn8SuQ.jpg

Elevation edition in W/T trim and all W/T trim doesn't have them. All other trim levels have the rear liners.

Posted
5 hours ago, Trucko20 said:

Anyone notice an increase in road noise with the air dam removed? 

I have not, nor has my dad who has a truck in this generation as well. Although theoretically I suppose it's possible: More turbulent air created by the flow through suspension parts instead of around them. These trucks are so heavily sound deadened though I doubt you'd hear it. 

  • Like 1
  • 2 years later...
Posted

Just took mine off after reading this thread. First thing I thought after about a week of having this beast was that this piece was a waste of material. 

 

For anyone that hasn't read previous posts: SUPER easy removal and the truck looks so much better.

Posted

I got stuck in the snow pulling out of my driveway because the air dam was trying to push the snow. Without the air dam I probably would have made it out. I had to put on chains just to get out of the driveway.  ( 2015 Silverado 4X4 Z71)  If we had more snow here I would consider removing it.

Posted

I drive off road quite often with ruts and more.  That air damn was coming off whether I ripped it off or took it off myself.  Chose option number 2 and took it off myself.  Best thing ever.

IMG_20190818_120717205_HDR (2).jpg

IMG_20190818_120717205_HDR.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

I love the look without the air dam. When I got my 18 I took it off-roading and I took a bump too fast and smashed up the air dam. Told myself “I didn’t really like it anyway” and just kept going. Lol

 

I’ve made a plan to take it off and install this skid plate along with a level, probably the Bilstein 5100’s but that’ll be next year. I love the look of their white truck since it’s the exact same as mine. Gives me goosebumps just looking at it!!

 

SDHQ is a local shop so I’ll gladly give them my business. [emoji1598]

 

c746ee56825a089d6ee9a8abf8af0fcb.jpg

88cea7fe68c9a6f4817a987723d1f9cc.jpg

70eb00c4dbc8e23a87c412966a2ada00.jpg

 

 

https://sdhqoffroad.com/collections/07-18-chevy-gm-1500-sdhq-built-products/products/16-2018-chevy-1500-sdhq-built-skid-plate

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,046 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...