Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I just installed my RX cc so far happy with it I do feel the vibration on the gas pedal usually low rpms nothing major Ill add foam insulator to the bracket later I hear a small hissing nothing major I just know it workings and it did come with the valve that most claim it didn't come with.

May I ask why yours is white? Is it plastic?

 

Thank you

Posted

May I ask why yours is white? Is it plastic?

 

Thank you

 

They come in a variety of colors.

Posted

Mother of god BG induction cleanings in my area range from 110 to 150.00 for my wifes 2013 Sonata DI motor.

 

I cannot locate a catch can for her car. I called the dealer and they are like why are you putting a catch can on a DI motor.

Posted

Mother of god BG induction cleanings in my area range from 110 to 150.00 for my wifes 2013 Sonata DI motor.

 

I cannot locate a catch can for her car. I called the dealer and they are like why are you putting a catch can on a DI motor.

 

I used a UPR catch can on my Optima turbo 2.0. I think the 2.4 is pretty similar in setup. Check this video out.

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Mother of god BG induction cleanings in my area range from 110 to 150.00 for my wifes 2013 Sonata DI motor.

 

I cannot locate a catch can for her car. I called the dealer and they are like why are you putting a catch can on a DI motor.

 

Yeah it was like $140 for my wife's Hyundai Accent. I can't imagine what it will run on the Silverado. But the guy at RX said they advise against these services because the carbon particles that get pushed through the cylinders can get trapped between the ring seals and score the cylinder walls. So I'm not sure what to do. I'm almost thinking not to do it at all on my truck unless it starts having issues.

Posted

he told me the same, I am thinking that if your doing this after 40-50 plus K miles that the possibility exists. But I would like to think that after say 15K and under that it wouldn't be too terrible. I put a can on at 8k miles and hope to delay the build up. My wife has 28K now and I need to get hers cleaned before installing the can

Posted

he told me the same, I am thinking that if your doing this after 40-50 plus K miles that the possibility exists. But I would like to think that after say 15K and under that it wouldn't be too terrible. I put a can on at 8k miles and hope to delay the build up. My wife has 28K now and I need to get hers cleaned before installing the can

That logic kind of makes sense since BG will warranty your engine as long as you do their service according to their maintenance plan which is like every 15,000 miles. I'm at 13,500 now so it's getting close to decision time here...

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I got my cc a few days ago. Hopefully installing it today. Sounds simple enough from what you guys are saying. What all have you guys been having to remove to get to the ports? I have a 2014 5.3. Looks like its a pretty tight space along the drivers side of the engine where the port is. Wiring harness and hose tied pretty tight along there. That back port is where my knife is pointing correct? Did you guys need to disconnect other stuff to get to it or remove all the plastic pieces covering everything?

post-138443-0-99806400-1424364073_thumb.jpg

post-138443-0-99806400-1424364073_thumb.jpg

post-138443-0-99806400-1424364073_thumb.jpg

post-138443-0-99806400-1424364073_thumb.jpg

Posted (edited)

Just got around to installing my can. Here is where I mounted it. I used one of the radiator mounting bolts. I like this spot better than the brake booster because it's closer to the front and will be easier to empty. I ran out of the supplied hose, so for temporary purposes I am using fuel hose one of the runs. I will swap it out with trans oil similar to hosing that was supplied with the can.

 

 

 

 

 

Thanks for the post Fodupot! I had looked around the engine bay for a better location to totally eliminate my vibration in the pedals and never even considered that location. Moved mine last night in fact.

 

20150218_220325.jpg

 

 

 

Drained the can last night with right at 1K miles since the last and got just a tad under 5oz of crap out.

 

20150218_215847.jpg

Edited by Newm
  • Like 1
Posted

I got my cc a few days ago. Hopefully installing it today. Sounds simple enough from what you guys are saying. What all have you guys been having to remove to get to the ports? I have a 2014 5.3. Looks like its a pretty tight space along the drivers side of the engine where the port is. Wiring harness and hose tied pretty tight along there. That back port is where my knife is pointing correct? Did you guys need to disconnect other stuff to get to it or remove all the plastic pieces covering everything?

Just press that grey retainer clip on the fitting and pull back on it and follow the routing of the hose and remove from the PCV port on the front of the engine under the Throttle body.You might have to move the injector harness a bit but not much.

 

RT

Posted

I'm putting a afraid jr on next week. Will I have an issues with the hoses on my catch can. The can is already installed

Did you buy the clean side filter with the can? if not then no issues. I did the clean side with mine and had to go to the Hardware store for a 1/2 pipe thread to 3/8 hose barb fitting for the clean side filter hose.

 

RT

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,873 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...