Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

How do you like the rt's?

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N910A using Tapatalk

 

Can't say too much since I only have 400 miles on them but so far I like them. Definitely a lot smoother than my Trail Grapplers and I'm not 100% that its true but when lifting them out the bed of my truck they felt lighter than my Trail Grapplers.

Posted (edited)

Finally home and able to get some pics of the truck, however I took these before I put the tow mirrors on so I'll take some more tomorrow.

e63ac126d3aae5afb5a7963267a1fcff.jpg8e41df5591f171e91cb032398d4c31d2.jpge22cd67f51e41eaf49d2fda09446b7a0.jpg898f896bc4b073ae69283b94f7ed96eb.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by sailor9908
  • Like 5
Posted

 

Thank you!

No, shes actually dirty in those pictures. Its just hard to tell with the truck being silver.

Any tire rubbing with your setup?

Posted

Here is my 2015 Silverado LT 4x4 Z71. Rough Country 2.5 Inch Leveling Kit, Method NV 17 Inch Wheels with Goodyear MT/R 285/70/17s

post-70501-0-10975400-1443902665_thumb.jpg

post-70501-0-10975400-1443902665_thumb.jpg

post-70501-0-10975400-1443902665_thumb.jpg

post-70501-0-10975400-1443902665_thumb.jpg

  • Like 3
Posted

Here is my 2015 Silverado LT 4x4 Z71. Rough Country 2.5 Inch Leveling Kit, Method NV 17 Inch Wheels with Goodyear MT/R 285/70/17s

Great taste!

 

Sent from Tapatalk App - Samsung S6

  • Like 1
Posted

Took a few shots tonight on the way home

 

EFC_8612_zpsbza3xgdo.jpg

EFC_8607_zpsc5cnvhcp.jpg

EFC_8605_zpstpsxahc0.jpg

EFC_8605-2_zpsbhdtjqos.jpg

Great pics, love the grey scale / bw photos.

 

Sent from Tapatalk App - Samsung S6

Posted

IMG_1571_zpspaddfpr6.jpg

 

A few weeks back camping in the White Mountains in Arizona. This picture is actually a part of contest I'm currently in as a Chevy finalist. Feel free to check it out and vote :chevrolet:http://www.realtruck.com/truck-madness/

Not sure if I have put up any pictures with the Napier tent.

Great pictures brother
  • Like 1
Posted

Finally home and able to get some pics of the truck, however I took these before I put the tow mirrors on so I'll take some more tomorrow.

898f896bc4b073ae69283b94f7ed96eb.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It took balls to cut up the bedside just for an exhaust tip.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

What lift and size rims and tires do you have ordinance?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N910A using Tapatalk

i have a 6'' BDS lift and the tires are Destination MT 35/12.5r20 on the factory 20" wheels.

  • Like 1
Posted

i have a 6'' BDS lift and the tires are Destination MT 35/12.5r20 on the factory 20" wheels.

Thank you

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N910A using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,858 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...