Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

 

Fabtech 7" and 35" Lexani Mud Beast

did you have to use spacers in the front for your stock wheels to fit with 35"s?

 

by the way best looking truck on here, man nice job!!!!!!!

Edited by chevy2tuff2006
Posted

8289b9a0ae8f8c862c71638ffd4422c3.jpga5d60d911c0875be702787cb893d6bc9.jpgedfc8620e9b279f7b0268fa16995f461.jpg

 

7" RCX with 35x12.50's on 20x10 Fuel Hostage wheels with -24 offset. No rubbing so far. Next up will probably be fender flares and painting the bumpers black. And that air dam is coming off as soon as I get time.

  • Like 6
Posted

8289b9a0ae8f8c862c71638ffd4422c3.jpga5d60d911c0875be702787cb893d6bc9.jpgedfc8620e9b279f7b0268fa16995f461.jpg

 

7" RCX with 35x12.50's on 20x10 Fuel Hostage wheels with -24 offset. No rubbing so far. Next up will probably be fender flares and painting the bumpers black. And that air dam is coming off as soon as I get time.

 

Do you think that some slightly larger tires could be fit under the 7" lift. I know that most ppl say that 35s can only fit on a 6" lift yet there are ppl running them on 4" lifts and even just on level kits. I am curious of what you think since you have the kit and can see it in person

Posted

 

Do you think that some slightly larger tires could be fit under the 7" lift. I know that most ppl say that 35s can only fit on a 6" lift yet there are ppl running them on 4" lifts and even just on level kits. I am curious of what you think since you have the kit and can see it in person

I don't think you could fit a 37" tire without a body lift. The 35's barely cleared and there really isn't any room to spare.
  • Like 1
Posted

did you have to use spacers in the front for your stock wheels to fit with 35"s?

 

by the way best looking truck on here, man nice job!!!!!!!

 

No spacers needed with stock 20's. Wouldn't work with 18's or less

Posted

That's a Damn good looking truck.

That's exactly what I was going to do with my emblem but couldn't figure out how to remove the red letters from the chrome. Did you just pop them out?

  • Like 2
Posted

That's exactly what I was going to do with my emblem but couldn't figure out how to remove the red letters from the chrome. Did you just pop them out?

Can't just "pop them out". You have to basically drill out the white tabs that hold the letters in. These tabs ARE NOT THE SAME TABS THAT HOLD THE LETTERS TO THE TRUCK. The tabs you need to drill down are white and at key parts of the letters

 

post-127147-141638276433_thumb.jpg

 

You have access to these if you look at the back side of the chrome that the letters are sitting in. Just be careful as to not go all the way through and go through the letters themselves! Would make for a real downer if you put a big hole in the letters themselves.

 

He used a pick to pick at the white tabs until he could remove the letters.

post-127147-141638276433_thumb.jpg

post-127147-141638276433_thumb.jpg

post-127147-141638276433_thumb.jpg

Posted

2014 Sierra 4x4

2.5" Level

285/70 17 Terra Grappler G2's

IMG_2508_zps8742fce3.jpg

IMG_2510_zpsf1192a18.jpg

IMG_2509_zps38ddfcbe.jpg

IMG_2511_zps5db260bd.jpg

I will say it again. More rubber-less wheel. I think 17s and 18s with a larger sidewall looks, and rides better. Plus you don't have to avoid every pot hole and curb at the drive thru. Just my opinion, but Dubs are for hoopties. Looks great. Looks like a TRUCK. :thumbs:

  • Like 3
Posted

2014 Sierra 4x4

2.5" Level

285/70 17 Terra Grappler G2's

IMG_2508_zps8742fce3.jpg

IMG_2510_zpsf1192a18.jpg

IMG_2509_zps38ddfcbe.jpg

IMG_2511_zps5db260bd.jpg

Did u put block in the back? How do the tires do on the ice and snow?
Posted

I will say it again. More rubber-less wheel. I think 17s and 18s with a larger sidewall looks, and rides better. Plus you don't have to avoid every pot hole and curb at the drive thru. Just my opinion, but Dubs are for hoopties. Looks great. Looks like a TRUCK. :thumbs:

I agree!!

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,337 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...