Jump to content

5.3 performance mods?

tommydouglas

By tommydouglas
in Engines & Drivetrain

Recommended Posts

tommydouglas New Member

tommydouglas

Posted
Posted

Hello. I just joined this site today. I traded my Ford F-150 on a Silverado yesterday. It is a regular cab short box Z71. Sounds like I can pick it up tomorrow. Very excited. I was just wondering about getting some more HP out of the 5.3 without voiding warranty. I had an Airaid cold air intake on my 5.0 and it seemed to help. Quite loud under full throttle tho. Any suggestions would be appreciated. If there is already another thread regarding this I apologize. Seems like a great community here. Thanks in advance.

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply
dgrinnell Enthusiast

dgrinnell

Posted
Posted

Autocal with a blackbear tune! No other way! Autocal lets you return it to stock when you take it to the dealer for work. I also have an Airaid tube that seems to let it breath a little better. Congrats and welcome to the GM fam.

MikeNH Senior Enthusiast

MikeNH

Posted
Posted
You are buying the wrong truck if you are looking for more out of the 5.3L before you even take delivery of it. Just get a 6.2L for less than 2k more. Avoid the trade in hit in a few months.

 

Can't get a 6.2 with the regular cab. And how is looking for go fast stuff any different than someone looking at wheels or lifts before taking delivery?

tommydouglas New Member

tommydouglas

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Can't get a 6.2 with the regular cab. And how is looking for go fast stuff any different than someone looking at wheels or lifts before taking delivery?

 

This. And if I can get 10 or 15 more HP with an easy bolt on air intake without voiding warranty why not? I like the looks of the regular cab short box and there doesn't seem to be very many around. 6.2 wasn't an option. The 5.3 seemed fine the day I drove it. But more power is always good.

crushNchowda Senior Enthusiast

crushNchowda

Posted
Posted

The 5.3 is a direct injected motor- they have much better tuning potential than non DI naturally aspirated motors. That being said, GM has historically underrated and restricted their small blocks via torque mgmt, pulled timing, conservative pig rich stock AF ratio etc.

 

A cold air intake and ECM/TCM 93 octane tune combined will really wake these trucks up. I would venture 25-40 rwhp added from these very basic mods alone. Add long tube headers and you'll get another 15 or so and the truck will be a different animal.

 

While the 6.2 is awesome in its own right, The 5.3 has great potential as well and I can't wait to tap into it myself.

TJay74 Senior Enthusiast

TJay74

Posted
Posted

Also FYI, you CANT tune the new trucks without GM knowing. The new global platform they use now has a flash counter that is turned on from the factory on all of the gas motors. I spoke with HP tuners about this and has already been verified on the Corvette and trucks that the ECM keeps count of flashes and GM will know.

 

So as the saying goes, got to pay to play. It is a quandary I am in as well, I went with the 6.2 truck but still would like to pep the tune up some but wont so I don't kill the warranty IF something does come up and GM asks for a snap shot of the calibration in the ECM. I plan on adding a CAI kit and a muffler and calling it good.

electricchiken7 Enthusiast

electricchiken7

Posted
Posted
Also FYI, you CANT tune the new trucks without GM knowing. The new global platform they use now has a flash counter that is turned on from the factory on all of the gas motors. I spoke with HP tuners about this and has already been verified on the Corvette and trucks that the ECM keeps count of flashes and GM will know.

 

So as the saying goes, got to pay to play. It is a quandary I am in as well, I went with the 6.2 truck but still would like to pep the tune up some but wont so I don't kill the warranty IF something does come up and GM asks for a snap shot of the calibration in the ECM. I plan on adding a CAI kit and a muffler and calling it good.

 

Is this only for the 2014s or would my 2013 be included?

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

 

 

novarox71 Enthusiast

novarox71

Posted
Posted

I'm sure it won't be long before some genius comes up with a work around and is able to reset the flash counter.

TJay74 Senior Enthusiast

TJay74

Posted
Posted

If there was a way for a work around I would have thought HP Tuners would have found it years ago, the flash counter has been turned to the ON position on the diesel trucks for years now.

Crooks Enthusiast

Crooks

Posted
Posted

How much does another pcm cost? Will the older pcm work with the new truck? You know in case yours goes bad.

 

Stupid triple post. This site works awesome on mobile

TJay74 Senior Enthusiast

TJay74

Posted
Posted

Cant really change out the ECM and get around it since they have to be flashed. Plus the TCM is located inside of the transmission now.

C25A1guy Enthusiast

C25A1guy

Posted
Posted

So far just typical stuff. Intake, exhaust, ECU flash upgrades. I'm debating on sending my truck to Vortech so they can do R&D on it.

  • 1 month later...
Dj0nes Enthusiast

Dj0nes

Posted
Posted

This is a great thread! I'm trying to order a cold air intake tonight but not sure which to roll with. Anyone running Airaid? I'll prolly call it quite after that and a exhaust. Last thing that would make sense is voiding one of the best warranty's in the game. Also, does anyone have advise on the high flow cats? And if they're worth it.

 

Thanks!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

seamonster Enthusiast

seamonster

Posted
Posted

 

You are buying the wrong truck if you are looking for more out of the 5.3L before you even take delivery of it. Just get a 6.2L for less than 2k more. Avoid the trade in hit in a few months.

Cant get a 6.2 for less than 2K more----you have to get an LTZ and you have to get the 20 inch wheels which is another 1200 .

I guess technically you can but they make you add on other stuff like the wheels that makes it over 3K and have to get at least a

LTZ

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,979
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    rayredbone
    Newest Member
    rayredbone
    Joined

  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 463 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      AFM Experience

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Question @diyer2 on this line if you please. Are you saying the shudder is the system turning on and off at the frequency of the shudder? Guess I'm asking if you are saying you have seen it do this with the bi-direction scan tool in graph mode? If so have you been able to discern the 'trigger'. Something is telling to cycle rapidly.    My truck just started doing this recently. 197K on the clock. My response has been M5 anything under 55 mph. I treat it like a lugging stick shift. Gear down and let it spin a bit. Engauge M5, then tow mode and then M6 lets the trans stay in 5th but the AFM is active. Smooth like Skippy.    My thought was that as a machine ages the friction gets lower and as the system is load based, the lower friction would allow it to turn on at ever lower rpm until it reaches the lugging point. And yes I am ignorant of any minimum rpm requirement for the system. If you know that would be useful information.    As you know I run a Scan-Gauge II which allows me to watch the On/Off of the signal to the VLOM. While in the shudder mode I'm not seeing is cycle at that frequency or at all for that matter outside the triggers @newdude posted a few years back. Now is it possible that the refresh rate isn't fast enough to catch it? Maybe. It is why I asked my first question about graphing and trigging parameter.     As we have observed from members here the failure point is all over the map miles wise as you note yourself in your opening post. That by itself begs a few questions like fellows that comment on these lifters failing even after the system has been disabled. Long after. 😬   https://www.enginelabs.com/news/tech-tips-replacing-ls-active-fuel-management-lifters-with-melling/   The Gen5 lifters operate the same as the LS versions. In fact they are the same lifter.    https://www.enginelabs.com/tech-stories/sorting-out-gen-v-lt-lifter-failure-with-a-simple-valvetrain-fix/        
    • SwitchBladeSierra
      14-18 Sierra 1500 Heated Steering Wheel Help

      By SwitchBladeSierra · Posted

      UPDATE 2: Steering wheel control backlights and control of the cluster can supposedly be achieved by adding a wire to pin 20 of the cluster and tapping it to pin 2 of the main clock spring harness. I'm going to give it a shot - will update  
    • newdude
      Seems to be Missing a lot of Updates

      By newdude · Posted

      GM Global A pickups 2019-2022 can do OTA programming for the radio.  GM VIP (GM Global B) can do OTAs for almost every module on board.  So a 2022.5 and newer pickup can do OTAs for recalls like the 2.7 fuel flow recall.  EVs get OTAs that improve one pedal driving, radio issues, HVAC issues, updated battery management software, etc.     So age of the vehicle/what GM electrical platform its on will alter what amount of updates can be pushed on OTAs.  
    • Blade8971
      Upgrade to a 2026 AT4 with the 3.0L Duramax

      By Blade8971 · Posted

      Thank You.   So far my new ride is making me look like a genius for going with the 3.0L, as my first fuel refill occurred over three weeks from when I took delivery.  This engine combination is very amazing.  So far no issues and had not done a regen yet.
    • Chuck FB
      Correct way to service 2024 l8t allison trans?

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I am curious as to how much fluid you put back in the transmission ( assuming you had replaced the filter to compare to my findings ) and then went through the process of warming up the trans before pulling the check plug to drain out the excess and if you measured how much came back out.    I just found it surprising that some claimed a certain amount less fluid being put in and then draining some back out. The attitude of the truck as per if the surface is level and how the trucks stance is would make quite a difference since the check plug is right at the front of the transmission. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...